Report of the Archaeological Survey of Chamak and its Surroundings, District Amaravati, Maharashtra

Similar documents
Fieldwalking at Cottam 1994 (COT94F)

Excavations at Shikarpur, Gujarat

Evidence for the use of bronze mining tools in the Bronze Age copper mines on the Great Orme, Llandudno

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate, Cambridgeshire. Autumn 2014 to Spring Third interim report

New Composting Centre, Ashgrove Farm, Ardley, Oxfordshire

3. The new face of Bronze Age pottery Jacinta Kiely and Bruce Sutton

Cetamura Results

39, Walnut Tree Lane, Sudbury (SUY 073) Planning Application No. B/04/02019/FUL Archaeological Monitoring Report No. 2005/112 OASIS ID no.

An archaeological evaluation at 16 Seaview Road, Brightlingsea, Essex February 2004

Moray Archaeology For All Project

Church of St Peter and St Paul, Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire

Colchester Archaeological Trust Ltd. A Fieldwalking Survey at Birch, Colchester for ARC Southern Ltd

Human remains from Estark, Iran, 2017

Chapter 2. Remains. Fig.17 Map of Krang Kor site

Lanton Lithic Assessment

An archaeological evaluation at the Lexden Wood Golf Club (Westhouse Farm), Lexden, Colchester, Essex

7. Prehistoric features and an early medieval enclosure at Coonagh West, Co. Limerick Kate Taylor

Difference between Architecture and Sculpture. Architecture refers to the design and construction of buildings

Greater London GREATER LONDON 3/606 (E ) TQ

Silwood Farm, Silwood Park, Cheapside Road, Ascot, Berkshire

Changing People Changing Landscapes: excavations at The Carrick, Midross, Loch Lomond Gavin MacGregor, University of Glasgow

2 Saxon Way, Old Windsor, Berkshire

AN EARLY MEDIEVAL RUBBISH-PIT AT CATHERINGTON, HAMPSHIRE Bj>J. S. PILE and K. J. BARTON

An archaeological watching brief and recording at Brightlingsea Quarry, Moverons Lane, Brightlingsea, Essex October 2003

Barnet Battlefield Survey

SERIATION: Ordering Archaeological Evidence by Stylistic Differences

Grim s Ditch, Starveall Farm, Wootton, Woodstock, Oxfordshire

Tepe Gawra, Iraq expedition records

Old iron-producing furnaces in the eastern hinterland of Bagan, Myanmar.

An archaeological watching brief at Sheepen, Colchester, Essex November-December 2003

St Germains, Tranent, East Lothian: the excavation of Early Bronze Age remains and Iron Age enclosed and unenclosed settlements

The Chalcolithic in the Near East: Mesopotamia and the Levant

STONE implements and pottery indicative of Late Neolithic settlement are known to

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT BRIGHTON POLYTECHNIC, NORTH FIELD SITE, VARLEY HALLS, COLDEAN LANE, BRIGHTON. by Ian Greig MA AIFA.

Monitoring Report No. 99

SALVAGE EXCAVATIONS AT OLD DOWN FARM, EAST MEON

Which of above statement is/ are true about the Indus Valley Civilization? a. I Only b. II Only c. I, II and III d. III Only. Answer: c.

Tell Shiyukh Tahtani (North Syria)

1 The East Oxford Archaeology and History Project

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate Cambridgeshire

A NEW ROMAN SITE IN CHESHAM

Is this the Original Anglo-Saxon period site of Weathercote?

Archaeological Material From Spa Ghyll Farm, Aldfield

Fort Arbeia and the Roman Empire in Britain 2012 FIELD REPORT

A Sense of Place Tor Enclosures

ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Undley Hall, Lakenheath LKH 307

T so far, by any other ruins in southwestern New Mexico. However, as

This is a repository copy of Anglo-Saxon settlements and archaeological visibility in the Yorkshire Wolds.

Monitoring Report No Sacred Heart Church Aghamore Boho Co. Fermanagh AE/10/116E. Brian Sloan L/2009/1262/F

Archaeological. Monitoring & Recording Report. Fulbourn Primary School, Cambridgeshire. Archaeological Monitoring & Recording Report.

Opium Cabin excavation Passport In Time July 21-25, 2014

HISTORY. Subject : History (For under graduate student) Topic No. & Title : Unit- 4 Indus Civilization Topic- c Chalcolithic Cultures of India

Test-Pit 3: 31 Park Street (SK )

A Fieldwalking Project At Sompting. West Sussex

NOTE A THIRD CENTURY ROMAN BURIAL FROM MANOR FARM, HURSTBOURNE PRIORS. by. David Allen with contributions by Sue Anderson and Brenda Dickinson

December 6, Paul Racher (P007) Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 900 Guelph St. Kitchener ON N2H 5Z6

Bronze Age 2, BC

JAAH 2019 No 24 Trier Christiansen Logbook

Scientific evidences to show ancient lead trade with Tissamaharama Sri Lanka: A metallurgical study

An archaeological evaluation in the playground of Colchester Royal Grammar School, Lexden Road, Colchester, Essex

A visit to the Wor Barrow 21 st November 2015

Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography. Safar Ashurov

THE RAVENSTONE BEAKER

A COIN OF OFFA FOUND IN A VIKING-AGE BURIAL AT VOSS, NORWAY. Bergen Museum.

STONES OF STENNESS HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

MUSEUM LffiRARY. George C. Vaillant Book Fund

Nippur under Assyrian Domination: 15th Season of Excavation,

Former Whitbread Training Centre Site, Abbey Street, Faversham, Kent Interim Archaeological Report Phase 1 November 2009

Novington, Plumpton East Sussex

Digging for Sangam glory

MARSTON MICHAEL FARLEY

BLACK HISTORY MONTH - Week 1 #BlackHistoryMatters

Wisconsin Sites Page 61. Wisconsin Sites

The Jawan Chamber Tomb Adapted from a report by F.S. Vidal, Dammam, December 1953

Rådhuspladsen, KBM 3827

Chapel House Wood Landscape Project. Interim Report 2013

I MADE THE PROBLEM UP,

1. Presumed Location of French Soundings Looking NW from the banks of the river.

Control ID: Years of experience: Tools used to excavate the grave: Did the participant sieve the fill: Weather conditions: Time taken: Observations:

Erection of wind turbine, Mains of Loanhead, Old Rayne, AB52 6SX

FURTHER MIDDLE SAXON EVIDENCE AT COOK STREET, SOUTHAMPTON (SOU 567)

January 13 th, 2019 Sample Current Affairs

Excavation Report. Medieval Occupation at Challis Green Barrington Cambridgeshire. Excavation Report. Client: Hills Partnership Limited.

The lab Do not wash metal gently Never, ever, mix finds from different layers

Archaeological sites and find spots in the parish of Burghclere - SMR no. OS Grid Ref. Site Name Classification Period

Digging in the Dirt. Attending an archaeological field school. Neil & Karen Peterson

SUMMARY REPORT OF 2009 INVESTIGATIONS AT OLD TOWN, LANCASTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

THE EXCAVATION OF A BURNT MOUND AT HARBRIDGE, HAMPSHIRE

Phase 2 Urban consolidation AD

WESTSIDE CHURCH (TUQUOY)

Report to the Arizona Archaeological and Historical Society on Jakob W. Sedig s Trip to Fife Lake, Michigan to Assess Archaeological Collections

Xian Tombs of the Qin Dynasty

Burrell Orchard 2014: Cleveland Archaeological Society Internship Amanda Ponomarenko The Ohio State University June - August 2014

EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION AT BRA YE-EN-LAONNOIS, RENGE NOYER, 1991: PRELIMINARY REPORT

Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society

Archaeological evaluation at the Onley Arms, The Street, Stisted, Essex

Hindu pantheon as observed on the gold plaques found from Southern Vietnam. Le Thi Lien Institute of Archaeology Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences

CHAPTER 14. Conclusions. Nicky Milner, Barry Taylor and Chantal Conneller

Chapter 2: Archaeological Description

Transcription:

Ancient Asia Hawkes, J D et al 2016 Report of the Archaeological Survey of Chamak and its Surroundings, District Amaravati, Maharashtra. Ancient Asia, 7: 6, pp. 1 7, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aa.115 SHORT REPORT Report of the Archaeological Survey of Chamak and its Surroundings, District Amaravati, Maharashtra Jason D. Hawkes *, Riza Abbas and Michael Willis * This report presents the results of a short programme of fieldwork targeted towards the investigation of the archaeological and geographical setting of the Chamak copperplate charter. This inscription, unearthed in the modern village of Chamak in 1868, records the grant of land to a group of Brahmins living in the village of Charmaka. These have long been assumed to be the same place, but the archaeological contexts of the find spot of the charter had never been explored. Preliminary surveys in and around Chamak have revealed a considerable amount of archaeological material, which is presented here. Keywords: archaeology; inscription; survey; Vakatakas; Vidarbha Introduction In February 2015, archaeological surveys were carried out in and around the village of Chamak, District Amravati, Maharashtra. Chamak is located 6 km southwest of the modern town of Achalpurat 21.20869 N 77.47192 E (see Fig. 1), and at an elevation of 351 m above seal level. It is known as the find spot of the Chamak Plates of PravarasenaII. These were discovered while ploughing a field near the modern settlement in 1868 (Fleet, 1888: 235). The inscription on the plates records the donation of the village of Charmaka to one thousand Brahmanas of various sects and schools by king Pravarasena II at the request of a local ruler, Kondaraja (Fleet, 1888: 236; Mirashi, 1963: 22 27). Together with a number of other copper plates found in the region (cf. Mirashi, 1963; Shastri, 2002), the Chamak copper plates remain one of the main sources for historical information about the Vakatakas and Vidarbha during the late early historic period (c. third to seventh century CE). Since their discovery, and due to the similarity of their names, it has been supposed that the village Charmaka mentioned in the inscription is the same as the modern village of Chamak. However, the wider archaeological contexts of the copper plates have not been explored. The aim of this exploration was to investigate the archaeological and geographical setting of the Chamak charter. This constituted the first stage in a wider programme of research targeted towards the investigation of the archaeological realities of the Vakatakas (Hawkes and Abbas, 2016 In Press). * Department of Asia, The British Museum, Great Russell Street, London, WC1B 3DG, GB Indian Numismatic, Historical and Cultural Research Foundation, P.O. Anjaneri, District Nashik, Nashik 422213, India Corresponding author: Jason D. Hawkes (hawkes.jason@gmail.com) Methods Due to the absence of previous archaeological exploration in the area, preliminary reconnaissance was carried out using an informant-based survey. Despite being unsystematic, this approach fixed the most apparent archaeological features in the landscape. Once located, archaeological sites were fieldwalked to identify areas of archaeological activity, including natural and structural features, scatters or surface material, and exposed sections preserving archaeological material in situ. Standard recording methods were used to record the main geographical and archaeological features of these sites. All locations and areas were recorded and mapped using a hand-held GPS device. Archaeological features and spot finds were measured (where necessary), and documented by written description and photographic record. The approximate extent of surface scatters was recorded, together with preliminary observations on the range of artefacts and their approximate surface density at both central and peripheral areas of the scatters. Where exposed sections were encountered, an attempt was also made to record the visible stratigraphic sequenceand collect pottery sampleswithout recourse to excavation. These samples were collected in order to identify and date the main phases of activity at these locations. Results This survey resulted in the discovery of a number of archaeological sites in the villages of Chamak and Chachondi (located 2 km to the south). These findings are listed here. Chamak The approximate location of the original find spot of the Chamak copper plate inscriptions was identified on the basis of local knowledge. The area is still devoted to agriculture. However, fieldwalking of this area did not result in the discovery of any archaeological material.

Art. 6, page 2 of 7 Hawkes et al: Report of the Archaeological Survey of Figure 1: Location map. Elsewhere in the village, the remains of a brick structure were noted beside the area of modern settlement known as Survada, near the banks of the Chandrabhaga River (see Fig. 2). This feature was characterised as a small but prominent mound, measuring approximately 15 m by 15 m and 2 m high. Brick fragments were observed partially exposed on the surface of the mound, enabling its identification as a brick-built structure. On top of the mound is a modest brick temple belonging to about the nineteenth century. It was not possible to ascertain the dimensions of bricks exposed on the surface of the mound, but they appear to have measured approximately 25 cm wide and 5 cm thick. Based on the dimensions of the mound and brick remains, the feature was interpreted as the possible remains of an earlier temple structure. It was not possible to date the structure beyond a general tentative assignment to the mid to late first millennium CE. Also at Survada, under a tree, is a small statue of Durga. This was reported to have been found in the river nearby, and can be dated on stylistic grounds to the tenth or eleventh century. Additionally there is a satipillar, probably of the eighteenth or nineteenth century. In the village of Chamak Khurd there are two modern temples containing images of Ganesh, Nandi and a Shiva Linga. These can all be assigned to the eleventh century on stylistic grounds. The oldest houses, built in a traditional style, date to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries according to residents. Outside the village, in a field known locally as Nagartekri, the base of a stone Shiva Linga dating to the eleventh or twelfth century CE was found installed in a modern shrine. Local villagers testify to this having been unearthed during agricultural activity in the near vicinity. At another location, an extensive scatter of surface remains was noted approximately 1 km to the northwest near the bank of the Chandrabhaga River, opposite village Dewari. Known locally as Padri (PDR01), the majority of this area is covered by a mixed fruit plantation. This obscured surface visibility making it difficult to ascertain the maximum extent of the surface scatter. Despite this, surface remains were visible across an area measuring 170 m North-South by 140 m East-West across the plantation, and extending for another 70 m into agricultural fields to the North. Within the plantation area, artefacts including potterysherds, brick (measuring 6 cm thick) and terracotta fragments were evident in the disturbed soil surrounding newly planted trees. In surrounding agricultural fields, these same materials were easily visible in the ploughed soil. Preliminary on-site identification of the pottery revealed a small number of sherds of fine black slipped wares, with common forms including shallow bowls with incurved rims, indicative of vessels dating to the later centuries BCE and early centuries CE, as well as coarse red micaceous wares. More common were sherds of thickly slipped buff and black wares with distinctive early

Hawkes et al: Report of the Archaeological Survey of Art. 6, page 3 of 7 Figure 2: Map showing the position of archaeological localities in and around the village of Chamak. and late medieval profiles. For further details of the pottery sherds identified on the surface of this and other sites, see Appendix 1. Together, these remains suggest a continuous settlement of this locality from at least the early centuries CE to the mid-second millennium CE. A coin hoard, consisting of a mixture of gold and silver coins, was found at Padri during the planting of trees and reported in the local press (Desha Unnate, January 2014). The hoard has not been available for study, but mixed hoards comprising both gold and silver coins are generally medieval in date a chronological horizon that is confirmed by the late medieval pottery sherds found on the site. Chachondi At the village of Chachondi, 2 km to the South of Chamak, exploration revealed four distinct areas of archaeological activity (Fig. 3). All localities were found in close proximity to each other. They are confined to the southwest of the modern village settlement and near the banks of the Chandrabhaga River, which exhibits a pronounced meander in this area. Immediately to the southwest of the modern village, evidence of an ancient water system was noted. Here, a wide channel, approximately 30 m wide and 5 m deep, fed by seasonal streams from surrounding fields and runsdirectly South in a straight line for approximately 500 m. Though blocked by a modern dam, the channel would originally have terminated in a natural basin, 120 m across, that may have functioned as a water tank. The straightness of the course of the channel suggests that it and the water tank may have been augmented by human action, either as some sort of a defensive feature, or as a means of harnessing seasonal surface waters more efficiently. The extent of such augmentation remains speculative. Yet, the influence of human action is confirmed by the existence of an additional channel that runs 140 m from the northeast corner of the tank to the main river to the East, providing an overflow conduit. That the conduit is purposefully cut is indicated by the steep vertical section of the channel, and the fact that it runs against the natural flow of water in both the channel and river. The remains of a low stone built wall across the mouth of the conduit, which may have served to maintain the level of water in the basin tank, further support this suggestion. It is not possible to date this water system on the basis of this stone-built feature or its general topography. However, it is likely associated with the other archaeological sites in the immediate vicinity. At 21.18975 N 77.46871 E, 240 m southwest of the modern village settlement, a scatter of surface material was noted in a recently ploughed field (labelled CHD01.III). The field lies on area of raised land between the water channel (noted above) and the Chandrabhaga River to the East. Surface remains extended over a wide area approximately 120 m North to South, by 80 m East to West. Despite the excellent surface visibility, the density

Art. 6, page 4 of 7 Hawkes et al: Report of the Archaeological Survey of Figure 3: Map showing the position of archaeological localities in and around the village of Chachondi. of artefacts was very low (less than 2 sherds per square metre). At the northern extent of area, additional pottery was noted in the spoil heap of a recently excavated well. Preliminary on-site identification of the pottery revealed sherds dating to the late Iron Age or early historic period (fine black slipped wares and red burnished wares), grey wares dating to the early medieval period, and modern pottery (Appendix 1). Local villagers testified to the fact that this field has only recently started to be used as agricultural land, meaning that modern ploughing will have had a minimal impact on archaeological deposits. This, together with the small size of the area, and low frequency of surface remains suggest that there was a low intensity of occupation in this location. At 21.18568 N 77.47178 E, another area of archaeological activity (CHD01.I) was identified on an elevated area of land 150 m East of the water tank, and 150 m South and West of the Chandrabhaga River meander. Known locally as Garhi, the area is characterised by a pronounced habitation mound approximately 150 m North-South by 90 m East-West. The surface of the northern half of the mound is obscured by an early modern fortification wall built from soils dug directly from the mound itself, and is heavily disturbed by modern digging activity with villagers using the soils from this mound for building purposes in the modern village. The remainder of the mound lies in agricultural land. Artefacts are visible across the entire surface of the mound at a high density (30 50 artefacts per square metre), and extend over a much wider area (380 230 m). The density of surface material was noted to diminish only as the natural topography of the surrounding area dropped to the West, North and East. A wide variety of artefacts were noted. They include: pottery, numerous semi-precious stone beads (agate, carnelian and lapis lazuli), glass beadsand bangles, brick fragments, terracotta beads and figurines, and iron slag (Fig. 4). A single coin dating to the sixteenth century was also found on the surface to the north of the mound (now preserved at the Indian Institute of Research in Numismatic Studies, Nasik). Preliminary on site analysis of the surface pottery

Hawkes et al: Report of the Archaeological Survey of Art. 6, page 5 of 7 Figure 4: Examples of small finds from the surface scatter at CHD01.I, including (clockwise from top left): lapis, agate and carnelian beads, terracotta figurine, and terracotta bead. Figure 5: Examples of shell artefacts from the surface scatter at CHD01.II. resulted in the identification of material dating from the late early historic period (micaceous red wares similar to those found in excavated contexts dating to the Vakataka period at other sites), the early medieval period (thickly slipped buff ware vessels with angular rims, grooved necks and carinated shoulders), and late medieval period (sherds of blue and white porcelain dating to the seventeenth century) (Appendix 1). The range of material and density of surface remains suggests relatively intense occupation in this location for at least one thousand years.

Art. 6, page 6 of 7 Hawkes et al: Report of the Archaeological Survey of Figure 6: Exposed Section at CHD01.II. On the opposite bank of the river, at 21.18937 N 77.47264 E, another distinct settlement mound (CHD01.II), known locally as Chahagarh, was noted on an elevated area surrounded on three sides by the meander of the river. The mound itself measures approximately 100 m x 100 m. High frequencies of surface remains were visible across an even wider area, approximately 250 m by 250 m. Artefacts included pottery, animal bone, and shell (both conch bangle fragments and cowries) (Fig. 5). The mound was also found to be heavily disturbed. The upper 3 m of archaeological deposits of the southwestern half of the mound have recently been dug away by a local farmer to level the field. This has resulted in a 50 m long section running northwest to southeast across the top of the mound (Fig. 6). The central 5 m portion of the section at highest point of mound was cleaned and recorded before the rest of the habitation layers were dug away by the farmer. The stratigraphy is relatively complex, and is characterised by a series of intercutting pits, postholes and charred layers, indicating intense long-term settlement. Where possible, charcoal samples and pottery fragments were collected to assist in the dating of archaeological deposits. The analysis of this material is not yet complete. Yet, preliminary analyses suggest that the upper (exposed) layers of site all relate to the late first millennium BCE (Hawkes, et al., 2016 In Press), with black slipped wares and fine black and red wares similar to those found in excavated Iron Age contexts at Kaundinyapur (Mishra, et al., 2016) predominating throughout the sequence. It is clear that archaeological deposits extend below the exposed levels, indicating that the site a deeper antiquity. The evidence provided by these areas of archaeological activity indicates the existence of a major settlement from at least the mid first millennium BCE to the early modern period, with the main areas of occupation having moved between locations over time. At least two distinct areas of Iron Age settlement are evident on both sides of the Chandrabhaga River. Until these are dated more conclusively it is unclear whether they are contemporary and represent a habitation with two distinct foci of activity, or have different chronologies and represent the movement of habitation from one location to the other. Evidence for the early centuries CE is scant. But by the mid-first millennium CE, the core area of settlement appears to have moved to the area known as Garhi, which then continued to have been occupied until at least the seventeenth century CE. The existence of artefacts that must have been transported to both sites (shell bangles, cowrie shells, and semi-precious stone beads) suggests that the settlement was a centre of consumption, if not production, and clearly linked to wider regional networks of communication and exchange. The water channel and tank were undoubtedly associated with the settlement on the western bank of the river. Yet, it is unclear during which phase of occupation they were augmented and incorporated into the built environment. Discussion Exploration of the Chamak area revealed a number of sites. It is clear that the Chamak copper platesare not isolated finds, and must now be considered in the context of a much wider archaeological landscape. The possible temple structure and settlement site at Chamak may have been related to the donated village and Brahmanical communities mentioned in the inscription. The remains at Chachondi indicate the existence of a much larger settlement. This was by no means a large urban centre of the scale of other contemporary urban centres elsewhere in Vidarbhasuch as Adam (Nath, 1992), Kaundinyapur (Dikshit, 1968; Mishra, et al., 2016; Smith, 2001), Mahurjhari (Deo, 1973; Mohanty, 2003) and Pauni (Deo and Joshi, 1972; Nath, 1998). Yet, it was certainly a large settlement with intense occupation and home to a variety of activities. Given its links with wider networks of communication and exchange, it may have been a local centre in the immediate area, and home to some sort of administrative and political authority. All of the settlement sites discovered during this season of exploration have significant potential for future work, and are worthy of further investigation. In the first instance, additional surveys involving geophysical prospection and systematic collections of surface material at all sites would result in a more complete picture

Hawkes et al: Report of the Archaeological Survey of Art. 6, page 7 of 7 of the main areas of sub-surface activity. This would then inform the design of future excavation strategies, and could be complemented by more systematic methods of landscape survey to locate other sites in the immediate area that may not be found by informantbased survey. Supplementary Files The supplementary file for this article can be found as follows: Supplementary File 1: Appendix1. http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/aa.115.s1 Acknowledgements This research was carried out as part of the ERC-funded project Asia Beyond Boundaries, an ERC Synergy project from the European Research Council under the EU s 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no.609823. Fieldwork was carried out under the direction of Dr Riza Abbas, with permission for exploration granted by the Archaeological Survey of India 12 January 2015 (F.No. 1/23/1/2014-EE). Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. References Deo, S B 1973 Mahurjhari Excavations 1970 72. Nagpur: Nagpur University. Deo, S B and Joshi, J P 1972 Pauni Excavation (1969 70). Nagpur: Nagpur University. Dikshit, M G 1968 Excavations at Kaundinyapur. Mumbai: Government Central Press. Fleet, J F 1888 Inscriptions of the Gupta Kings and their Successors. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, 8. Calcutta: Government of India Press. Hawkes, J and Abbas, R 2016 (In Press) Copperplates in Context: A Preliminary Investigation of the Study and Archaeological Settings of Land Grant Inscriptions. Pratnatattva. Hawkes, J, Abbas, R, Shete, G and Willis, M 2016 (In Press) A Newly Discovered Early Iron Age Settlement at Chachondi, District Amravati, Maharashtra. Puratattva, 46. Mirashi, V V 1963 Inscriptions of the Vakatakas. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, 5. Ootacamund: Government of India Press. Mishra, S, Shete, G and Deotare, B C 2016 Excavations at Kaundinyapur (2000 2001). In: Basa, K K, Mohanty, R K and Ota, S B (Eds.) Megalithic Traditions inindia: Archaeology and Ethnography, Vol. 1. Bhopal: Indira GandhiRashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya, pp. 263 284. Mohanty, R K 2003 A Preliminary Report of the Excavations at Mahurjhari, 2001: a Megalithic and Early Historic Site in Vidarbha, Maharashtra. Pratnatattva, 9: 41 48. Nath, A 1992 Adam an Index to Vidarbha Archaeology. In: Nayak, B U and Ghosh, N C (Eds.) New Trends in Indian Art and Archaeology, Vol. 1. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan, pp. 69 79. Nath, A 1998 Further Excavations at Pauni 1994. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India. Shastri, A M 2002 Great Ages of Indian History: Vakatakas Sources and History. New Delhi: Aryan Books International. Smith, M 2001The Archaeology of an Early Historic Town in Central India. BAR International Series1002. Oxford: Archaeopress. How to cite this article: Hawkes, J D, Abbas, R and Willis, M 2016 Report of the Archaeological Survey of Chamak and its Surroundings, District Amaravati, Maharashtra. Ancient Asia, 7: 6, pp. 1 7, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aa.115 Published: 10 October 2016 Copyright: 2016 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Ancient Asia is a peer-reviewed open access journal published by Ubiquity Press. OPEN ACCESS