The Middle Caddoan Period in the Big Cypress Creek Drainage Basin

Similar documents
Artifact Assemblages from San Augustine County, Texas, Sites Recorded in by Gus E. Arnold

Documentation of Cemeteries and Funerary Offerings from Sites in the Upper Neches River Basin, Anderson, Cherokee, and Smith Counties, Texas

The Middle Caddoan Period in the Lower Sulphur River Area

Caddo Ceramic Vessels from the Paul Mitchell Site (41BW4) on the Red River, Bowie County, Texas

The Caddo Archaeology of the Musgano Site (41RK19) in the Sabine River Basin of East Texas

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, Volume 35

Documentation of Caddo Funerary Objects from the Crenshaw Site (3MI6) in the Gilcrease Museum Collections

SERIATION: Ordering Archaeological Evidence by Stylistic Differences

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, Volume 29

3. The new face of Bronze Age pottery Jacinta Kiely and Bruce Sutton

IRAN. Bowl Northern Iran, Ismailabad Chalcolithic, mid-5th millennium B.C. Pottery (65.1) Published: Handbook, no. 10

Chapter 2. Remains. Fig.17 Map of Krang Kor site

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology; Volume 31

ROYAL MAYAN TOMB. Faculty Sponsor: Kathryn Reese-Taylor, Department of Sociology/Archaeology

Novington, Plumpton East Sussex

terra australis 31 Ceramic assemblages from excavations on Viti Levu, Beqa-Ugaga and Mago Island Geoffrey Clark Introduction

THE RAVENSTONE BEAKER

Fieldwalking at Cottam 1994 (COT94F)

Furniture. Type of object:

Human remains from Estark, Iran, 2017

Artifacts. Antler Tools

Hartley Fort Ceramics

Excavations at Shikarpur, Gujarat

PENDERGAST: THE MacDOUGALD SITE 29 J. F. P E N D E R G A S T ( A C C E P T E D FEB R U AR Y 1969 ) THE MACDOUGALD SITE

H1CA60. NATliRAt. HISTORY

Peace Hall, Sydney Town Hall Results of Archaeological Program (Interim Report)

Decorative Styles. Amanda Talaski.

The lab Do not wash metal gently Never, ever, mix finds from different layers

Abstract. Greer, Southwestern Wyoming Page San Diego

The lithic assemblage from Kingsdale Head (KH09)

( 123 ) CELTIC EEMAINS POUND IN THE HUNDRED OP HOO.

THESE 'Further Notes' indicate that information on the Kalanay pottery

McDONALD INSTITUTE MONOGRAPHS. Spong Hill. Part IX: chronology and synthesis. By Catherine Hills and Sam Lucy

The Euphrates Valley Expedition

T so far, by any other ruins in southwestern New Mexico. However, as

SAWANKHALOK GLOBULAR JARS: THE FIRST SIAMESE CELADON WARE TO REACH ENGLAND, AND OTHER NOTABLE PIECES

A Fieldwalking Project At Sompting. West Sussex

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT BRIGHTON POLYTECHNIC, NORTH FIELD SITE, VARLEY HALLS, COLDEAN LANE, BRIGHTON. by Ian Greig MA AIFA.

Texas Archeological and Paleontological Society

Chiara Tarditi: FRAGMENTS OF METAL VESSELS FROM THE NORTHERN SECTOR

SALVAGE EXCAVATIONS AT OLD DOWN FARM, EAST MEON

Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography. Safar Ashurov

Revisiting the Amuq sequence: a preliminary investigation of the EBIVB ceramic assemblage from Tell Tayinat

Tepe Gawra, Iraq expedition records

Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria

CONEHEAD EFFIGIES: A DISTINCTIVE ART FORM OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY. George E. Lankford 1 and David H. Dye 2

Test-Pit 3: 31 Park Street (SK )

Sa-huYnh Related Pottery in Southeast Asia

RECONSTRUCTING THE PAST: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY OF A COLES CREEK PERIOD ASSEMBLAGE

Bowls and Burials an Update from Grand Bay, Carriacou, West Indies: May June 2011

The Prehistoric Indians of Minnesota

Life and Death at Beth Shean

The Florida Anthropologist

39, Walnut Tree Lane, Sudbury (SUY 073) Planning Application No. B/04/02019/FUL Archaeological Monitoring Report No. 2005/112 OASIS ID no.

Available through a partnership with

Cetamura Results

1. Presumed Location of French Soundings Looking NW from the banks of the river.

Excavation of Tomb M28 in the Cemetery of the Rui State at Liangdai Village in Hancheng City, Shaanxi

Hagar el-beida 2 Saving Sudanese antiquities

Cultural Design with History in Mind

Recently Discovered Marked Colonoware from Dean Hall Plantation, Berkeley County, South Carolina

The Prehistoric Indians of Minnesota

Earliest Settlers of Kashmir

Evolution of the Celts Unetice Predecessors of Celts BCE Cultural Characteristics:

Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: The Museum of Indian Arts and Culture,

As already observed in 2016, the assemblage from Levels 1-3 of Trench D at Logardan

Neolithic Shunshanji Site in Sihong County, Jiangsu

THESISES OF Ph. D. Kata Dévai. Glass Vessels from Late Roman Times Found in Graves in the Hungarian Part of Pannonia

Bronze Age 2, BC

THE EXCAVATION OF NON BAN JAK, NORTHEAST THAILAND - A REPORT ON THE FIRST THREE SEASONS

THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE NUBIAN EXPEDITION EXCAVATIONS

Activity 27 WHOSE HAIR IS IT?

2010 Watson Surface Collection

St Germains, Tranent, East Lothian: the excavation of Early Bronze Age remains and Iron Age enclosed and unenclosed settlements

NOTE A THIRD CENTURY ROMAN BURIAL FROM MANOR FARM, HURSTBOURNE PRIORS. by. David Allen with contributions by Sue Anderson and Brenda Dickinson

Gershom Bartlett ( ) was a native of Bolton but carved hundreds of stones for burying grounds throughout eastern Connecticut.

Paul and Veronika Bucherer

SUMMARY REPORT OF 2009 INVESTIGATIONS AT OLD TOWN, LANCASTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

Square Layer. Square Layer: Step-by-Step Guide

Comparison of Neolithic Sites in Southern Vietnam

AMERICA S ADENA MOUNDBUILDERS

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate Cambridgeshire

A NEW ROMAN SITE IN CHESHAM

Old Kush in the Fourth Cataract Region

Burrell Orchard 2014: Cleveland Archaeological Society Internship Amanda Ponomarenko The Ohio State University June - August 2014

Publishers: Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology, University of Warsaw (PCMA UW), Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego (WUW)

The Jawan Chamber Tomb Adapted from a report by F.S. Vidal, Dammam, December 1953

STONE implements and pottery indicative of Late Neolithic settlement are known to

The Fire of the Jaguar

TREND COLLECTION: PIYA UNISON

Conical bowl with bi-disc foot

Excavation on the Liangzhu City-Site in Yuhang District, Hangzhou City

EXCAVATIONS AT SUREZHA (ERBIL PLAIN, KURDISTAN REGION, IRAQ)

Tell Shiyukh Tahtani (North Syria)

The Prehistoric Indians of Minnesota

INVESTIGATIONS AT THE CUNNINGHAM-FLENNIKEN CEMETERY, KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE

Chapter 16 Haircutting

Design Decisions. Copyright 2013 SAP

PLEISTOCENE ART OF THE WORLD

Transcription:

Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State Volume 1997 Article 38 1997 The Middle Caddoan Period in the Big Cypress Creek Drainage Basin Bo Nelson Unknown Mike Turner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Nelson, Bo and Turner, Mike (1997) "The Middle Caddoan Period in the Big Cypress Creek Drainage Basin," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1997, Article 38. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1997/iss1/38 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact cdsscholarworks@sfasu.edu.

The Middle Caddoan Period in the Big Cypress Creek Drainage Basin Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1997/iss1/38

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology. No. 10 ( 1997) The Middle Caddoan Period in the Big Cypress Creek Drai nage Basin Bo Nelson and Mike Turner The Middle Caddoan period in the Big Cypress Creek drainage basin has been based upon a synthesis of Thurmond's (1990) archaeological overview of the has in. Thurmond defines a transitional Caddoan period (dating ca. A.D. 1300-1400) from 14 sites that have ceramic assemblages combining Early Caddoan and J.ate Caddoan stylistic attributes. A review of these sites, along with additional information from recent archaeological investigations (e.g., Kotter et al. 1993), suggests that the Middle Caddoan period in the Big Cypress Creek basin has an evolving cultural diversity that extends over a longer period of time, fitting well with Story's (1990) definition of the period as dating from ca. A.D. 1200-1400. Although there is an absence of documented subsistence evidence and few radiocarbon dates (only seven from four sites), there are recognizable distinctions that may be made about Middle Caddoan period settlement patterns, mortuary practices, and the material culture record in the basin (Table 1). Based on these observations (discussed below), and the currently available archaeological record, 38 sites in the Big Cypress Creek drainage basin may now be classified as belonging to the MiddleCaddoan period (Figure I). Most of these sites are located in the extreme western portions of the basin in the vicinity of mounds (Z.V. Davis-McPeek, 41UR4/99) and mound complexes (Keith, 41Tf11, and Hale, 41 IT I 2) that dare to either the Early or Middle Caddoan period. The majority of the sites (n::::23) represent small settlements (farmsteads and hamlets), but there are recognizable larger sites covering several acres (41CPI5. 41CP230, 41Tfl10, and HS Skiles f no trinomiall). Twenty-two of the 38 sites (see Figure 1) are small cemeteries or are habitation sites with an associated family burial ground containing less than 10 individuals; these burials usually have small amounts of grave goods. The grave goods often appear to be age and/or gender specific (e.g., miniature vessels, pipes, and arrow points), with children or adolescents sometimes buried along side the adults. There are also reports of deep shaft burials (some with multiple interments) along Greasy Creek, but as there are several Mlddle Caddoan cemeteries in this area ( 41 CP3, 41 URI, 41 UR 17, and 41 UR21 ), the exact locations are unknown; descriptions of some of the burials, along with photographs of some of the grave goods, do exist, however. It is the ceramic sherds and vessels from these settlements and cemeteries that the greatest distinctions may be made between the known Middle Caddoan period sites in the Cypress Creek basin. The comparison of ceramic assemblages from Middle Caddoan sites within the basin document at least three spatial and/or temporal groupings. These groups are best characterized by differences in the proportions of such decorative techniques as red slipping, brushing, and engraving (see Table 1 ). The first group of sites contain identifiable vessels of Sanders Plain, Sanders Engraved, and Canton Incised. These are associated in burials wirh plain jars and small howls, and if accompanied by a water bottle, the bottle is usually more elaborately engraved. The engraved designs include solid or cross-hatched pendant triangles around Jines; vertical or horizontal zones divided by ladders or cross-hatching, with the zones sometimes filled with the same or alternating circular or rectangular designs. Other vessels have decorative elements of diagonal incising, cross-hatched pendant triangles, rows of punctations (often parallel), and engraved ladders. Rims are straight to slightly thickened with some lip notching, and some rims contain from two to four tabs or lugs. Vertical scalloping of the

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology. No. 10 (1997) 2 CERAMICS GROUPl Table 1. Characteristics of the Middle Caddoan Pe.riod in the Cypress Cree.k Basin ldeo11ftable Types: Sanders Plain Sanders Engraved Canton Incised Effigy Vessels Undecorated small Bowls & Jars DECORATION TECHNIQUES: pendant triangles (solid & cross-hatched) diagonal lines (engraved & incised) vertical & horizontal zones ofladders or cross-hatching circular designs~ rectangular designs punctations (often in parallel rows); applique (small amounts) scalloped rims (vertical & horizontal); rim tabs (two to four) lugs (two to four) rim punctations red supping {farge amounts) btyshma (vea_ SJD!D amounts If preseprt) GROUP 2 Sanders Engraved Canton Incised Haley Engraved Maxey Noded Redware Pease Brushed-Incised Rattlesnake Motif La Rue Neck Banded Undecorated small Bowls & Jars engraved designs icrease in varieties & amounts horizontal & vertical scrolls~ ladders pendant triangles (small solid & large cross-hatched) punctating; applique; neck-banding; decorative straps (all increase) red-slipping still in large amounts some with scroll engravings GROUP3 Canton Incised Haley Engraved Pea.'\e Brushed-Inctsed Rattlesnake Motif La Rue Neck Banded Vessels begin to resemble the shapes, manufacture, and contain designs similar and with some elements like those better known in Late Caddoan brushing becomes dominant decorating teclmique red slipping (very small amounts) Calibrated Cl4 DATES in the Cypress Basin 41TI11 (AD 1309-1J56); (AD ll83-1445) 41TT372 (AD 1216-1283); (AD 1306-1365); (AD 1337-1394) 4JURtJJ (AD 1295-14!5!5} 4HIR142. (AD 1168-1292)

'- c t:: 8 E. g, z c ;::1 :::r n ~ ~ ~ )<! $:1) "- > 8 :::r ~ c 0 (JCI '-< z c 0 ~ 2: I e Site toc.ti._.. M~ SCAlE m KM. 0 s 10 IJ 20 ~ -.J '..;J Figure 1. Middle Caddoan Sites in the Cypress Creek Drainage Ba$in.

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, No. 10 (1997) 4 KEY: Middle Caddoan Sites in the Cypress Creek Drainage Basin. 1. 41FK4 c 20. 41FK70 c ss 2. 41FK7 c ss 21. 41FK66 ss 3. 41FK32 c ss 22. 41FK65 ss 4. 41CP230 LS 23. 41CP10 c ss R 5. 41CP16 ss 24. 41TT226 c ss 6. 41CP39 ss 25. TT-Swanano c 7. 41TTI10 c LS R 26. 41CP3 c ss 8. 41TT310 ss 27. 41UR17 c 9. 41TT115 ss 28. 41UR1 c 10. 41CP47 ss 29. 41UR21 c R 11. 41TT121 ss 30. 41UR142 ss 12. 41CP15 LS 31. 41UR133 ss 13. 41TT52 ss 32. 41UR8 c 14. 41TT14 ss 33. 41MR6 c R 15. 41TT36 c ss 34. MR-Big Oaks c 16. 41TT650 c ss 35. 41MR.63 c R 17. 41TT372 ss 36. MR-Anjo c 18. 41TT135 c ss 37. CS-Hay c R 19. 41TT16 ss 38. HS-Skiles c LS c ss LS R Cemetery Small Settlement Large Settement Rattksnake Motij MOUNDS A 41 TT12 L.A. Hale Early Caddoan B. 41TT11 ~orge L. Keith Middle Caddoan C. 41UR4/99 Z.V. Davis I McPeek Early Caddoan

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, No. 10 (1997) 5 rim is also noted, along with scalloping extending horizontally out from the mouth of the vessel (Figures 2-4). While ceramic sherd counts will have large amounts (up to 30-40%) of undecorated red-slipped wares, the most distinguishing characteristic of the first group is the absence of brushing as a decorative treatment. Sites included in the first group include: 4ICPI6, 41CP39, 41CP47, 41FK4, 41FK7, 41FK32, 41FK65, 41FK70, 41TT135, 41TT372, and 41TT650 (see Figure 1 ). The second group of Middle Caddoan sites have Sanders Engraved, Canton Incised, Maxey Noded Redware, Haley Engraved, Pease Brushed-Incised, and vessels with the engraved rattlesnake motif (see Turner, this volume). Many bowls and jars remain undecorated, but engraved vessels are more common. Decorative elements include ladders, horizontal and vertical scrolls, circular lines and branches, large cross-hatched pendant triangles, and repeating paneled triangular and circular motifs, along with the red-slipping of some engraved vessels (see Figures 2-4). While vessels with punctations, applique, neck-banding, and decorative straps occur in noticeable amounts, red slipping remains common (up to 20~30%). Brushing becomes one of the dominant decorative techniques, occurring in frequencies between 25-40%. The following sites in the Big Cypress Creek basin are included in the second group: 41CP10, 41CP15, 41CP230, 41Tfll, 41TT14, 41TT16, 411T36, 41TT52, 41TT110, 411Tl15, 41TT121, 41Tf226, TT-Swanano, 41UR133, and41ur142(seefigure 1). The ceramics associated with the third group show, more than do the other two groups, closer stylistic relationships with the subsequent Late Caddoan period in the Big Cypress Creek basin. There is increased brushing (30-50%) in the ceramic assemblages, while red slipped pottery becomes a minor component (less than 5%). Vessels begin to have the shapes, the manufacturing techniques, and the designs very similar to those found in the better known Late Caddoan types (Figures 5-7). The engraved rattlesnake motif is still present (see Figure 7d), however, along with Pease Brushed-Incised and Haley Engraved, and engraved ceramics increase in amount and diversity in this third group of Middle Caddoan period sites. Sites included in the third group include the following: 41CP3, CS Hay, HS-Skiles, 41MR6, 41MR63, MR-Rig Oaks, MR-Anjou, 41UR1, 41UR8, 41 URI7, and 41UR21 (see Figure I; see also Turner, this volume). References Cited Kotter, S. M., R. Rogers, R. Taylor, K. Reese-Taylor, and W. P. Glander 1993 Archaeological Investigations within the Monticello B-2 First Five-Year DisturbanceArea, Titus County, Texas. Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., Austin. Story, D. A. 1990 Cultural History of the Native Americans. In The Archeology and Bioarcheology of thegulfcoastalpuun, by D. A. Story, J. A. Guy, B. A. Burnett, M.D. Freeman, 1. C. Rose, D. G. Steele, B. W. Olive, and K. J. Reinhard, pp. 163-366. 2 Vols. Research Series No. 38. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville. Thurmond, J. P. 1990 Archeology of the Cypress Creek Drainage Basin, Northeastern Texas ajui Northwestern Louisiana. Studies in Archeology 5. Texas Archeological Research Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin.

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, No. 10 ( t 997) 6 0 (..) w Figure 2. Group I and 2 Vessels: a-b, plain bowls: c-e, engraved bowls; f, effigy bowl.

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, No. 10 (1997) 7 A B Figure 3. Group 1 and 2 Engraved Bottles. c

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, No. 10 (1997) 8 I UJ 0 Figure 4. Group I and 2 Incised, Punctated, and Plain Bowls, andl Jars.

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology. No. 10 ([997) 9 WI c( (.) Figure 5. Group 3 Vessels: a-c. jars; d, Haley Engraved; e, slipped bottle.

Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology. No. 10 (1997) 10 w u... 0 Figure 6. Group 3 Engraved Bowls.

Journal of Northeast Teltas Archaeology, No. I 0 ( 1997) I l... ~. A -...,_... _. '- \ I ff. - "' / - --.. -"@/- ~...: - 0- - / ' - -- It!\\...... : B c -- -... - ---. _ ;~":':.:~ 0 Figure 7. Group 3 Engraved Bowls and 13otlle with Engraved Rattlesnake Motif.