IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
Case 3:07-cv MLC-JJH Document 1 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 12 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 18

2:08-cv PMD-GCK Date Filed 02/05/2008 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:07-cv FDW-DCK Document 1 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 22

Case 0:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK DILUTION, FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, AND UNFAIR COMPETITION

Case 2:10-cv AJT-RSW Document 1 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 17

PROTECTION AND ENFORCEMENT CHALLENGES FOR TATTOO COPYRIGHTS

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2018 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:14-cv PAE Document 1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 19

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/18/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Copyright in Tattoos:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO.

Case 3:03-cv CFD Document 19-9 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

FAVORITE DESIGNER: FAVORITE STYLIST: Applicant Initial FWLV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL. DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 47 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 40

CHAPTER 114: TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Who Owns Your Body Art?: The Copyright and Constitutional Implications of Tattoos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case5:10-cv LHK Document62 Filed10/05/10 Page1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

City State Zip. Model Dress size 6X 10 Height Weight Date of Measurement

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

[Second Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 8, 2018

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR TATTOO AND/OR BODY PIERCING BUSINESS LICENSE

14.22 TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS.

Case 1:17-cv SLR Document 56 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID #: 1839 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Senate Bill No. 193 Senator Hardy. Joint Sponsors: Assemblymen Hardy and Stewart

2017 American Indian Arts Marketplace at the Autry November 11 & 12, 2017

Luke Mulligan, State Bar # Asst. Federal Public Defender Attorney for Defendant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SAFEGUARDING YOUR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

CITY CLERK. Draft By-law: Renaming a Portion of Kipling Avenue as Colonel Samuel Smith Park Drive (Ward 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore)

FASHION LAW. Kirby B. Drake, Partner Tiffany Johnson, Associate August 17, Klemchuk LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 11

Notice of Opposition

PORTAGE COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION 2017 NEW BODY ART ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT TO OPERATE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Body Art Technician License Application

Assembly Amendment to Senate Bill No. 193 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor

Fashion and U.S. IP Law

ENTRY FORM DE LORENZO NOVACOLORIST COMPETITION 2018 HOW TO ENTER

Body Art Temporary Technician License

SANITARY REQUIREMENTS FOR TATTOO & BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS

Minnesota Department of Health

Case 0:18-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2018 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR TATTOOS: ARE TATTOOS COPIES?

Case 1:14-cv RLV Document 14 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 53

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

SANITARY REQUIREMENTS FOR TATTOO & BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS

Art in the Plaza Guidelines

TATTOOING, BODY PIERCING, PERMANENT COSMETICS & BRANDING APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION

REGULATING COMMUNITY STANDARDS ORDINANCE

H 7626 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR TATTOO AND/OR BODY PIERCING APPLICANT LICENSE

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 209th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 25, 2000

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING September 20, 2017 Agenda Item B.1

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before MR C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCCLURE. Between. and

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 729

PLEASE NOTE: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION ON PAGE 2 MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Name Business is Conducted Under (DBA):

Case3:13-cv EDL Document1 Filed10/11/13 Page1 of 40

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STORM DRAIN STENCILING PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION

Chapter 67. BODY ART ESTABLISHMENTS (TATTOOING) Established (09-56)

As Engrossed: S2/1/01. By: Representatives Bledsoe, Borhauer, Bond, Rodgers, Green. For An Act To Be Entitled

RESEARCH PERMIT SIGN-OFF SHEET. The attached research application has been reviewed by the individuals below with recommendations as follows:

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

TESTIMONY OF STEVE MAIMAN CO-OWNER, STONY APPAREL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA IN OPPOSITION TO H.R U.S

CONSOLIDATION UPDATE: DECEMBER 11, 2002

The 61 st Bangkok Gems & Jewelry Fair. The 62 nd Bangkok Gems & Jewelry Fair February 2018, hrs. 25 February 2018, hrs.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/21/2014 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 266 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2014. Exhibit 4

Case 1:04-cv RCL Document 195 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 13 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

H 7915 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

A Bill Regular Session, 2007 SENATE BILL 276

Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 No 32

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MARCH 10, 2014

LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MANAGEMENT 3.0 FACILITATORS

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #:1

Intravenous Access and Injections Through Tattoos: Safety and Guidelines

2017 SEAC Native Art Market November 10-11, 2017 Hyatt Regency Downtown 100 East 2 nd Street Tulsa, Oklahoma

OSBORNE Y COMPANIA S.A., Opposer, INTER PARTES CASE NO. 1891

Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Makes various changes concerning the State Board of Cosmetology. (BDR )

Case 3:17-cv YY Document 35 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 36

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES DIVISION

Terms and Conditions of Hire

A Finding Aid to the Barbara Mathes Gallery Records Pertaining to Rio Nero Lawsuit, , in the Archives of American Art

Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 246 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor

DOTDOTSMILE INDEPENDENT MERCHANDISER PROGRAM AGREEMENT

FASHION BOARD APPLICATION

Transcription:

Whitmill v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Doc. 2 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION S. VICTOR WHITMILL, Plaintiff, v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-752 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This matter came before the Court at a hearing on the Motion of Plaintiff S. Victor Whitmill for a Preliminary Injunction. Having heard the arguments of counsel, and having carefully reviewed the memoranda and all of the files, records, testimony of witnesses and proceedings, the Court hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which constitute the grounds for granting the Motion: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Plaintiff S. Victor Whitmill is an award-winning visual artist who works in various mediums, including the creation, design, and application of tattoo art to bodies. He is a citizen of the State of Missouri and lives in a small town in the south-central portion of the state. 2. On February 10, 2003, while living in Las Vegas, Nevada, Mr. Whitmill created and applied an original and distinctive tattoo to the upper left side of the face of the former, world heavyweight champion boxer Michael Gerard Mike Tyson (the Original Tattoo. True and accurate photographs of Mr. Whitmill in the process of tattooing the Original Tattoo onto Mr. Tyson and of Mr. Tyson viewing the tattoo immediately after it was completed by Mr. Whitmill are attached to this Order as Exhibits 1 and 2. Dockets.Justia.com

3. Mr. Whitmill, doing business at the time as Paradox-Studio of Dermagraphics, is the sole creator, author, and owner of all rights, including copyright, in the Original Tattoo, which is original and fixed in a tangible medium of expression. 4. On the day Mr. Whitmill created the Original Tattoo, Mr. Tyson signed a release form acknowledging that all artwork, sketches and drawings related to [his] tattoo and any photographs of [his] tattoo are property of Paradox-Studio of Dermagraphics. (A true and accurate copy of the Feb. 10, 2003 Tattoo Release, redacted in accordance with the Court s rules, is attached as Exhibit 3. 5. Defendant Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. ( Warner Bros. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 4000 Warner Boulevard, Burbank, California. Warner Bros. is engaged in the production, acquisition and distribution of motion pictures for theatrical exhibition, home entertainment and other forms of distribution throughout the United States, including the State of Missouri. 6. Mr. Whitmill recently learned that Warner Bros. is planning to release a motion picture later this Spring entitled THE HANGOVER 2 (the Movie. 7. The Movie features a virtually exact reproduction of the Original Tattoo (the Pirated Tattoo, which appears on the upper left side of the face of the Stu Price character in the Movie, played by actor Ed Helms. 8. The Pirated Tattoo is a recurring device and plays an important role in the plot of the Movie. 9. The Pirated Tattoo is prominently featured in the marketing and promotional materials for the Movie as demonstrated by a current movie poster (the Movie Poster that defendants are using to advertise the Movie. A true and correct copy of the Movie Poster is attached as Exhibit 6.

15 At all relevant times, Warner Bros. has had access to the Original Tattoo. 16 There is substantial similarity between the copyrightable expression in the Original Tattoo and the Pirated Tattoo. 17 Mr. Whitmill has never been asked for permission for, and has never consented to, the use, reproduction, or creation of a derivative work based on his Original Tattoo, including the Pirated Tattoo. Nor has he ever been asked or agreed to the public display and distribution of a motion picture containing the Pirated Tattoo, or to the use of any of his other exclusive rights in the Original Tattoo under the Copyright Act. 18 Warner Bros. has already infringed Mr. Whitmill s copyright through its unauthorized copying, distribution and public display of the Pirated Tattoo in advertising and promotion for the Movie and by making an unauthorized derivative work namely, the Pirated Tattoo that is based upon and copies virtually all of the copyrightable subject matter of the Original Tattoo. 10. As a direct and proximate result of defendant s wrongful acts, defendant has been and will continue to be unjustly enriched, and Mr. Whitmill has suffered and will continue to suffer damages in an amount not yet fully determined. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction of this action under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a, this being an action arising under the Copyright Laws of the United States, Title 17, United States Code, particularly, Title 17 U.S.C. 101 et. seq. 2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 3. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b and (c and 1400(b, as Defendant does business in this District. 4. Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim against Defendant in that its conduct in copying Plaintiff s original copyrighted work and producing and distributing derivative

copies thereof constitutes infringement of Plaintiff s exclusive rights as a copyright owner under 17 U.S.C. 106 and 106A. 5. These wrongful acts of defendant have caused irreparable injury to Plaintiff, and unless this Court restrains defendant from further use of the Pirated Tattoo, Mr. Plaintiff will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which he has no adequate remedy at law. 6. If not enjoined, Defendant will continue to infringe Plaintiff s copyright by using the Pirated Tattoo to advertise, market, and promote the Movie; by releasing the Movie and otherwise distributing or licensing others to distribute the Movie in various formats and distribution channels; and, by distributing or licensing derivative works that include the Pirated Tattoo. 7. The harm or potential harm to Plaintiff in not granting the relief requested outweighs any harm or potential harm to Defendant in the Court granting such relief. 8. The public interest favors the issuance of the relief requested by Plaintiff. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc and its principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, partners, representatives, distributors, licensees, divisions, affiliates, firms, parent corporation(s or subsidiaries, and all others under its control or in active concert or participation with any of them be enjoined and restrained during the pendency of this litigation from directly or indirectly: 1. Copying, distributing, publicly displaying, or otherwise infringing Plaintiff s copyright in his Original Tattoo, either in defendant s soon-to-be-released motion picture THE HANGOVER 2 or otherwise

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant shall file with this Court and serve upon Plaintiff within thirty (30 days following the date of this Order, a written report, under oath, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Defendant has complied with this injunction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c, shall post an injunction bond, in cash or written by a corporate surety in the sum of $, for payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred by the Defendant in the event that it is found that Defendant have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. Such bond is to be filed with the Clerk of this Court no later than :00 p.m., on, 2011. This Order shall remain in force and effect unless modified by further order of the Court. Failure to comply with any part of this Order may result in sanctions. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Dated: