Society of Cosmetic Chemists Toronto Chapter Robert Ross-Fichtner SCC Toronto April 6, 2016 1
Let s see what we will do in the next hour Sessions Bill The Safe CosmeticsModernization Act Feinstein Collins Bill The Personal Care Products Safety Act Compare and Contrast: t Two pieces of Legislation Regulatory News ICMAD
Why do governments regulate things??? 3
How Much TRUST do we have in cosmetics and their ingredients??? 4
GOOGLE: How to Ban Dangerous Chemicals (using simple tools you have around the house) 1,340,000 000 Hits 5
Leading NA authority on Cosmetic Safety? CCTFA? FDA? PCPC? ICMAD? SCC? CIR? State of California?????? 6
California Safe Cosmetics Act Given the presence of substances in cosmetic products that cause cancer and reproductive toxicity, it the heavy use of these products by women of childbearing age, the significant exposure to these products in occupational settings such as nail and beauty salons, the adverse impacts of these substances on human health, the inadequate information about the.. 7
Environmental Working Group (EWG) 8
9
WHY??? 10
11
12
13
14
TWO BILLS
SESSIONS BILL
SESSIONS BILL The bill was proposed and named after the US congressman Pete Sessions Introduced The Safe Cosmetics Modernization Act November 19 th, 2015 This act reforms and improves the FDA s ability to streamline and strengthen consumer safety requirements
SESSIONS BILL Took several years and meetings with the FDA, cosmetic industry and activists along with watching how other countries regulations are changing Takes current laws and modernizes them to create a strong federal regulatory program Meaningthere will be ONE regulatory authorityinin the US Will enhance The Food and Drugs Administration s authority
SESSIONS BILL This piece of legislation is supported by the Independent Cosmetic Manufacturers And Distributors (ICMAD) modernizes and improves the FDA s ability to assure the safety of cosmetic products by examining ingredient safety, establishing manufacturing processes and tracking and quickly addressing adverse health impactsfrom potentially unsafe products and requir ing that all manufacturers be registered with the FDA Bill will continue a system if cosmetic regulation that has kept the U.S. a leader in the world market by maintaining a record of safety
According to the Bill itself: SESSIONS BILL To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish new procedures and requirements for the registration of cosmetic manufacturing establishments, the submission of cosmetic and ingredient statements, and the reporting of serious cosmetic adverse events, and for other purposes This will be possible without affecting small businesses to allow entrepreneurs and innovators withinthethe cosmetic industry to compete in both national and international marketplaces
SESSIONS BILL Federal Preemption ADR Reporting GMPs Ingredient Safety Cosmetic and facility Registration
SESSIONS BILL Sections 4,5: 5:Registries of Cosmetics and Manufacturing Establishments Creates mandatory registration of products and manufacturing facilities using current registration systems The Secretary shall require that even domestic and foreign establishments engaged in the manufacture of a cosmetic must be registered with the Secretary within 60 business days after the first commercial sale in the US No cost to the government in setting up new reporting facilities
SESSIONS BILL Section 6: Serious and Unexpected Adverse Event Reporting for Cosmetics Amends Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by the addition if certain criteria to the end of this section If a product is causing a serious safety problem the FDA will know immediately Procedures will be part of the post marketing risk management program which is similar to those in place for dietary supplements and OTC drugs
SESSIONS BILL Section 7: Good Manufacturing Practises Amends Section 601 (21 U.S.C. 361) by including these at the end where presently they are not found Will establish hgmps for cosmetics that t are focused on the risk associated with these products There are currently few enforcement actions and it is apparent that the greatest risks are associated with either micro contamination contamination or issues with the manufacturing process
SESSIONS BILL Section 8: Safety Substantiation for Cosmetic Ingredients and Non Functional Constituents Amends Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by the addition if certain criteria to the end of this section Session 9: National Cosmetic Regulatory Databank Amends Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by the addition if certain criteria to the end of this section
SESSIONS BILL Section 11: Prohibited Acts Amends Section 301 (21 U.S.C. 331) by adding prohibited acts to the end of the current version Section 12: NationalUniformity Amends Section 752 (21 U.S.C. 379) by adding national uniformity for cosmetics at the end of the current legislation
SESSIONS BILL Definition of a cosmetic: Allow: alter the appearance by temporarily affecting the Structure or Function of the human skin
SESSIONS BILL Summary It will increase consumer protection on cosmetics while still allowing a continued growth of small businesses in the US Allow them to thrive due to a national uniformity of regulations Will allow for an industry that is open for small business entrepreneurs to bring true innovation Our goal was to improve transparency and safety while helping our country and our industry maintain its competitive edge. We believe we have accomplished this goal. Sharon Blinkoff
Feinstein Collins Bill Senate
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Bill was introduced and named after Senators Dianne Feinstein and Susan Collins Titled the Personal Care Products Safety Act Would require the FDA to investigate five potentially risky ingredients every year
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL When first introduced, the ICMAD immediately stated its opposition to the bill The bill is being supported by the Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) They represent over 600 companies within the cosmetic industry The bill is also supported by the majority of major companies such as: Johnston & Johnston Procter & Gamble Estee Lauder Unilever
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL The Senate has stated that many Americans are surprised to learn that the ingredients in their cosmetics are largely under regulated Under this bill, the FDA would have the ability to stop companies from selling unsafe products and would be able to recall any products it finds dangerous
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL First brought up due to Europe s robust system which includes: Consumerprotectionwith productregistration registration Ingredient reviews As Feinstein has stated: it will require FDA to review chemicals used in these products and provide clear q p p guidance on their safety. In addition, the legislation has broad support from companies and consumer groups alike.
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Accordingto the Billitself: itself: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ensure the safety of cosmetics It will protect consumers and create better industry compliance by strengthening the FDA s authority to regulate ingredients
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Once again, whenever in this Act an amendment is expressed to a section, the reference is considered to be made to a section or chapter of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.301 et seq.) Section 101: Registration of cosmetic facilities and Cosmetic ingredient statements Will add registration and Fees for existing manufacturing or processing of cosmetics For each cosmetic product, a responsible person must submit to the FDA an ingredient statement
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Section 102: Review of ingredients and non functional constituents; safety of finished products Amendment to Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by further adding to the end Would require the FDA to evaluate a minimum of five ingredients per year to determine their safety and appropriate use Thefirst set of chemicals for review includes: 1. Diazolidyl Urea 2. Lead Acetate 3. Methylene Glycol/formaldehyde 4. Propyl paraben 5. Quaternium 15 Would provide companies with clearer guidance about ingredients Ex: A chemical may be deemed inappropriate for use in children s products or appropriate for professional application only
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Section 103: Good manufacturing practices for cosmetics Amend Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. USC 361 et seq.) by adding this to the end Will direct the FDA to issue regulations on GMPs for personal care products Section 104: Adverse event reports Amend Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by adding this to the end With any cosmetic distributed in the US, the responsible person shall submit to the FDA a report of any serious adverse events associated with the product This bill will require companies to provide contact information on their products for consumers and report serious adverse events to the FDA within 15 days
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Section 105: Records Inspection; mandatory recall authority Amend Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. USC 361 et seq.) by adding this to the end Require manufacturers to register annually with the FDA and provide the agency with information on the ingredients used in their personal care products. Would provide the FDA with the authoritytoto order recalls of certain cosmetics that threaten consumer safety Section 106: Labelling Amend Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by adding this to the end The FDA requires labelling of products that includes ingredients that are no appropriate for children and those that should be professionally administered
FEINSTEIN COLLINS BILL Section 107: Coal tar chemicals Amend Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. USC 361 et seq.) by adding this to the end The FDA may review any ingredient to determine it is safe for cosmetic products Section 108: Animal Testing Alternatives Amend Chapter VI (21 U.S.C. 361 et seq.) by adding this to the end This will minimize the use of animal testing for the safety of cosmetic ingredients and the FDA will encourage the use of alternative testing
SUMMARY FEINSTEN COLLINS BILL In order to fund ndthese activities, ities the bill authorizes esthe FDA to collect user fees from cosmetic manufacturers The bill would provide federal standards so that this industry knows what to expect and companies can plan for the future with certainty tit
Compare and Contrast: Two Pieces of Legislation
COMPARE AND CONTRAST Sessions Bill FDA Oversight Allow cosmetics to make structure function claims which are therapeutic claims GMPs ADR Reporting N/A Ingredient Safety Precedent Feinstein Collins Bill FDA Oversight n/a GMPs ADR Reporting FEES Massive ingredient safety provisions Facility and ingredient registration Facility and ingredient registration Minimal work for FDA Huge work for FDA
Regulatory News ICMAD
REGULATORY NEWS In November 2015, lawmakers in the House and Senate introduced the bill H. 4061 which directs the HHS secretary to develop a final rule for the use of natural ingredients The cosmetic industry groups are still monitoring the legislation and the FDA s efforts, to control the labelling of theses claims
REGULATORY NEWS The FDA s Office of International Programs is realigning its interaction enforcement activities: In order to strategically focus its resources to monitor counterfeiting, diversion and other criminal activities Attorneys and stakeholders believe the new federal legislation banning the use of plastic microbeads is light on details and fails to define some key terms Companies producing biodegradable microbeads from plant materials are unsure if the ban applies to their products An FDA rulemaking or guidance may be required to clarify several points
REFERENCES http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve/?file_id=445a9268 4964 4de0 89f9 4caf577099f2id 4964 4d 89f9 4 f577099f2
Thank you! é Robert Ross-Fichtner @RobRossFichtner robrf@focalpointresearch.net 905-271-2709 ext 222 2016 Focal Point Research Inc. No copies without permission. 47