UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 8

2:08-cv PMD-GCK Date Filed 02/05/2008 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 22

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 18

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK DILUTION, FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, AND UNFAIR COMPETITION

Case 3:07-cv MLC-JJH Document 1 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 12 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:07-cv FDW-DCK Document 1 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 1:18-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 0:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2018 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:18-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2018 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:10-cv AJT-RSW Document 1 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 17

Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) Please logout when you are done to release system resources allocated for you.

Notice of Opposition

Case 1:14-cv PAE Document 1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 19

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/18/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

x x

Case 3:17-cv YY Document 35 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 36

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #:1

Supreme Court decision not to review Louis Vuitton s requested appeal against upstart parody tote bag maker My Other Bag allows

Case 1:15-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 08/07/15 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Notice of Opposition

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/21/2014 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 266 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2014. Exhibit 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/30/16 Page 1 of 38 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

OSBORNE Y COMPANIA S.A., Opposer, INTER PARTES CASE NO. 1891

DECISION. The grounds for Opposition to the registration of the mark are as follows:

[Second Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 8, 2018

Luke Mulligan, State Bar # Asst. Federal Public Defender Attorney for Defendant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DECISION. The grounds for the opposition are as follows:

Pall Mall Dress Code May 2018

Maury County Board of Education

Chino Valley Independent Fire District Tim Shackelford, Fire Chief

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE SYSTEM ENTITIES HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY AND PROCEDURE PERSONAL APPEARANCE DRESS CODE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/18 Page 1 of 28 PageID #:1

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR TATTOO AND/OR BODY PIERCING BUSINESS LICENSE

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 47 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 40

Case5:10-cv LHK Document62 Filed10/05/10 Page1 of 10

HORRY COUNTY FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT PROUD * PREPARED * PROFESSIONAL STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINE SOG 406 UNIFORM POLICY

Students. Uniform Dress Code

HUMAN RESOURCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Revision Date: August 23, 2016

MILFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT Milford, Delaware K-12 SCHOOL DRESS CODE POLICY. Milford School District School Dress Code Policy Statement

FASHION LAW. Kirby B. Drake, Partner Tiffany Johnson, Associate August 17, Klemchuk LLP

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 2:08-cv PMP-GWF Document 1 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 27

PLEASE NOTE: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION ON PAGE 2 MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Name Business is Conducted Under (DBA):

DRESS AND APPEARANCE GUIDELINES. Lands End School Uniforms

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MARCH 10, 2014

Body Art Establishment

XIII. SCHOOL UNIFORM POLICIES

November December, 2015 Vol. 105 No. 6

Body Art Temporary Technician License

The 17 th Western China International Fair 2018

Standardized Dress Code

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-1 Filed: 02/15/18 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:38. Exhibit 1

DATE ISSUED: 7/27/ of 5 LDU FNCA(LOCAL)-X

FIDM Fashion Club ApplicatioN Form

TESTIMONY OF STEVE MAIMAN CO-OWNER, STONY APPAREL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA IN OPPOSITION TO H.R U.S

About Our Uniform 2018

School Uniform. Uniform Guidelines

Dress Code. General Philosophy. Concept. Policy Enforcement. Dress code charts may also be accessed on PCA s website.

DRESS AND GROOMING (All Grade Levels)

Case 1:14-cv RLV Document 14 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 53

About Our Uniform 2017

DOTHAN CITY SCHOOLS STUDENT UNIFORM CODE Grades K 8

Student Dress Code

Body Art Technician License Application

DRESS CODE I. INTRODUCTION GENERAL INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONS TO: FROM: Human Resources Administration Department of Homeless Services

(c) UNI Rights Reserved.

Protection. Hot Issues in IP. Presented by: Steve Wadyka. September 11, 2018 Stockholm, Sweden

Victoria ISD Dress Code

DECISION. Respondent-Applicant is QINGHAI CAI, a Chinese citizen with address at Unit A1 No. 90 Cuneta Avenue, Pasay City.

Fashion and U.S. IP Law

Here is what you have to do: 1. Fill out an Emergency Procedure Card- pick up in main office

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/13 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1

Baypoint Preparatory Academy Dress Code Policy

DfT Terms & Conditions

Employee Dress Code Policy and Administrative Regulation

d. Footwear which mars floors or is a safety hazard.

Theodora Fleurant. Q&A With. Through the Lens. Letter From the Editor. In This Issue. Tell us a little about yourself

CITY OF TURLOCK WORK ATTIRE/ PERSONAL APPEARANCE POLICY

поиск Open Analytics: Popular Goods

UNIFORM DRESS CODE FOR BELMONT ACADEMY GRADES VPK-12

NO SNEAKERS OF ANY KIND

Fall Spirit Week. WOnKy WeDnEsdAY (Oct. 24)

Texas. Clothing and Footwear Sales Tax Holiday August

Baypoint Preparatory Academy Dress Code Policy

Student Dress Code

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations SEONG KIM, Cal. Bar No. 0 shkim@sheppardmullin.com 0 Avenue of the Stars, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: 0..00 Facsimile: 0..0 LAURA L. CHAPMAN, Cal. Bar No. lchapman@sheppardmullin.com TONI QIU, Cal. Bar No. 0 tqiu@sheppardmullin.com Four Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, California -0 Telephone:..00 Facsimile:.. Attorneys for Plaintiff FOREVER, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION FOREVER, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. Plaintiff, GUCCI AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and GUCCIO GUCCI S.p.A., an Italian entity, Defendants. Case No. FOR: () DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF TRADEMARKS; () CANCELLATION OF FEDERAL TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS; () DENIAL OF FEDERAL REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Plaintiff Forever, Inc. ( Forever ) hereby states the following allegations for its Complaint against Defendants Gucci America, Inc. and Guccio Gucci S.p.A. (collectively, Gucci ). INTRODUCTION. Forever seeks protection against a threat of trademark litigation by Gucci over a parallel stripe design of alternating bands colored blue-red-blue and green-red-green. The colors red, blue, and green, and stripe designs, are among the most favorite, popular and widely used colors and design features on clothing. Gucci seeks to prevent Forever from using stripes with common colors on clothing and accessories sold at Forever. Gucci has warned Forever in writing of Gucci s allegations that Forever is infringing Gucci s trademark and has threatened to sue Forever to recover monetary and injunctive relief. Consumers are not likely to believe any of Forever s items are manufactured by, or otherwise associated with, Gucci. Forever is not infringing any Gucci trademark. Gucci s trademark registrations relevant to this dispute should be cancelled. Gucci s pending applications should not proceed to registration. This matter is ripe for a declaratory judgment. PARTIES. Plaintiff Forever, Inc., is a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business at 0 N. Mission Road, Los Angeles, California 00.. On information and belief, Defendant Gucci America, Inc. is a New York corporation, having a principal place of business at 0 Hartz Way, Secaucus, New Jersey 00.. On information and belief, Defendant Guccio Gucci S.p.A. is an Italian entity, having its registered address at Via Tornabuoni /r, 0 Florence, Italy.. On information and belief, Gucci is the owner of the claimed trademarks that Gucci has asserted against Forever, as set forth below. -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to U.S.C. and U.S.C.,, and because Count is for declaratory judgment for claims involving trademarks and an actual case or controversy exists between Gucci and Forever, and because this action involves substantial claims arising under the Lanham Act.. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Guccio Gucci S.p.A. and Gucci America, Inc., because they conduct business in the state of California and because they have threatened legal action against a company that is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.. Venue is appropriate in this district pursuant to U.S.C. (b) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Forever s claim have occurred in this district and a substantial part of the property that is subject to the action is situated in this district. FOREVER. Forever is an American success story. It began in with a single, 00-square-foot store in Los Angeles, California. It has since grown into a fashion giant whose stores are now housed in large spaces in shopping malls including several flagship stores in major cities exceeding,000 square feet. Today, Forever is one of the most well-known specialty retailers of apparel, clothing, and accessories, operating through its online store and in over retail stores throughout the United States, as well as in stores throughout the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, and the UK. 0. Most of the merchandise Forever sells in its online and brick-andmortar stores is made exclusively for Forever.. Forever owns numerous trademark registrations for retail store services, clothing, and fashion accessories. The well-known FOREVER name appears prominently on all Forever stores, on Forever s website, and on -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 clothing Forever sells. Consumers cannot purchase Forever s clothing items without encountering the FOREVER trademark.. Forever sells clothing displaying a wide variety of colors and ornamental patterns and designs. Some of the clothing Forever sells has ornamental/decorative stripes. Forever does not use stripes as a trademark or source identifier on any of its clothing items. Any use of stripes on clothing sold by Forever is ornamental, decorative, and aesthetically functional. THE GUCCI DEMAND LETTERS. Forever received a letter dated December, from Ms. Victoria Galante, Junior Legal Counsel at Gucci. This December, letter demanded that Forever cease and desist from any and all use of blue-red-blue stripes.. Forever received a second letter dated January, from Ms. Victoria Galante, Junior Legal Counsel at Gucci. This January, letter contained the same demands as the December letter, namely that Forever cease and desist from any and all use of blue-red-blue stripes.. Forever received a third letter dated February, from Ms. Andrea L. Calvaruso, an attorney at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, on behalf of Gucci ( February Demand Letter ). The February, letter demanded that Forever discontinue all sales of certain clothing and accessory items with bluered-blue and green-red-green stripes.. The specific items identified as infringing products in Gucci s February Demand Letter are pictured below: -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0. Forever, through its Senior Corporate Counsel, Jerry Noh, responded to Gucci s February Demand Letter in a letter dated March,, in which Forever denied Gucci s claims of infringement. GUCCI S TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS AND APPLICATIONS. In its February Demand Letter, Gucci asserted that each of the items pictured above (the Striped Products ) infringes Gucci s rights in various federal trademark registrations for the use of blue-red-blue and green-red-green stripes on clothing and accessory items. The registrations asserted in Gucci s February Demand Letter are listed in the table below: -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark Reg. No. Reg. Date: // THE MARK IS AT LEAST ONE PROMINENT STRIPE CONTAINING THREE DISTINCT BANDS OF COLOR, THE COLORS BEING BLUE, RED, AND THEN BLUE, APPEARING ON THE GOODS AND NOT CONTIGUOUS TO ANOTHER STRIPE. Incontestable: // Renewal Date: //0 Reg. No. Reg. Date: // The color(s) Blue and Red is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two blue bands. Class: Goods : [ GOODS MADE OR COATED WITH PRECIOUS METAL -NAMELY, CANDLE HOLDERS, ] WATCHES, [ CUFFLINKS, BRACELETS, PENDANTS, KEY RINGS, PAPERWEIGHTS, EARRINGS, RINGS, NECKLACES, ICE BUCKETS, GOBLETS, AND STYLIZED ANIMAL CONTAINERS ]. FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000 : Gym bags, wallets, cosmetic cases sold empty. FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Page ID #:0 0 Mark Reg. No. Reg. Date: // THE MARK IS MADE UP OF A STIPE CONTAINING THREE DISTINCT BANDS OF COLOR, THE COLORS BEING BLUE, RED AND THEN BLUE. Incontestable: // Renewal Date: //0 Reg. No. Reg. Date: // THE DRAWING IS LINED FOR THE COLORS BLUE AND RED. Incontestable: // Renewal Date: /0/0 Class: Goods : FOOTWEAR. FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000 : [ WALLETS, ] PURSES, HANDBAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, TOTE BAGS [, BUSINESS CARD CASES, CREDIT CARD CASES, PASSPORT CASES, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, ATTACHE CASES, VALISES, SUITCASES, DUFFLE BAGS, NECKTIE CASES, UMBRELLAS, SADDLES, BRIDLES, WALKING STICKS, CANES AND KEY CASES ]. FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark Reg. No. 0 Reg. Date: // The color(s) GREEN and RED is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two green bands. Class: Goods : Shorts, pants, jeans, leggings, t-shirts, polo shirts, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, dresses, skirts, swimwear, one piece garments for infants and toddlers, cloth bibs, scarves, ties, hats, gloves, suspenders, belts. FIRST USE: 000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 000. On information and belief, Gucci America, Inc. is the registered owner of the following trademark registrations for green-red-green stripes, which were not included or identified in Gucci s February Demand Letter: Mark Reg. No. Reg. Date: // THE MARK IS MADE UP OF A STRIPE CONTAINING THREE BANDS OF COLOR, THE COLORS BEING GREEN, RED THEN GREEN. THE MARK IS LINED FOR THE COLORS RED AND GREEN. Incontestable: // Renewal Date: 0//0 Class: Goods : FOOTWEAR. FIRST USE: 000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 000-0- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark Reg. No. Reg. Date: // THE MARK IS MADE OF A STRIPE CONTAINING THREE DISTINCT BANDS OF COLOR BEING GREEN, RED, THEN GREEN. Incontestable: // Renewal Date: //0 Reg. No. 0 Reg. Date: // THE MARK IS MADE UP OF A STRIPE CONTAINING THREE DISTINCT BANDS OF COLORS, THE COLORS BEING GREEN, RED THEN GREEN. Incontestable: // Renewal Date: //0 Class: Goods : GOODS MADE OR COATED WITH PRECIOUS METAL-NAMELY, [ CANDLE HOLDERS, ] WATCHES, [ CUFFLINKS, BRACELETS, PENDANTS, KEY RINGS, PAPERWEIGHTS, EARRINGS, RINGS, NECKLACES, ICE BUCKETS, GOBLETS, STYLIZED ANIMAL CONTAINERS AND LETTER OPENERS ]. FIRST USE: 000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 000 : WALLETS, PURSES, HANDBAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, TOTE BAGS, CARD CASES, [ PASSPORT CASES, COSMETIC CASES, ] ATTACHE CASES, VALISES, SUITCASES, DUFFLES, [ [ NECKTIE CASES, UMBRELLAS, SADDLES, BRIDLES, WALKING STICKS, CANES, ] AND KEY CASES. FIRST USE: 000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 000 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark Reg. No. Reg. Date: // The color(s) GREEN and RED is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two green bands. Class: Goods 0: Eyeglasses and sunglasses and cases therefor; protective covers and cases for mobile electronic communication devices and computers; cell phone straps; computer carrying cases. FIRST USE: 00. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 00 : Jewelry and key rings of precious metal. FIRST USE: 00. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 00 : Cosmetic cases sold empty, suitcases, luggage, duffle bags, diaper bags partly and wholly of leather; pet accessories, namely, carriers, collars and leashes. FIRST USE: 00. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 00. Hereinafter, the registrations identified in the charts above will be collectively referred to as the Gucci Registrations.. On information and belief, Gucci America, Inc. is the owner of record for the following trademark applications for blue-red-blue and green-red-green stripes (hereinafter, the Gucci Applications ): -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark App. Serial No. Class: Goods The color(s) Blue and Red is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two blue bands. The color(s) Blue and Red is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two blue bands. Filing Date: 0// Filing Basis: A Filing Date: // Filing Basis: A : Clothing, namely, sweaters, shirts, tops, jackets, coats, skirts, pants, jeans, shorts, dresses, boots, sandals, sneakers, belts and hats FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000 : Baby blankets. FIRST USE: 000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 000 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark App. Serial No. Class: Goods The color(s) Blue and red is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two blue bands. The color(s) GREEN and RED is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two green bands. Filing Date: // Filing Basis: A Filing Date: // Filing Basis: A 0: Sunglasses; mobile phone cases; cell phone straps. FIRST USE: 00000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 00000 : Backpacks. FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000 : Scarves. FIRST USE: 00000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 00000 : Baby blankets. FIRST USE: 000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 000 -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Mark App. Serial No. Class: Goods The color(s) Green and red is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a stripe containing three distinct bands of color with a red band in the middle of two green bands. 0 Filing Date: // Filing Basis: A GUCCI S THREATENED CLAIMS : Backpacks; briefcases and messenger bags. FIRST USE: 0000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 0000. Gucci s February Demand Letter accuses Forever of trademark infringement based on Forever s sale of the Striped Products.. In addition to demanding that Forever immediately ceas[e] any and all manufacture, importation, offering for sale, sale, shipment, advertising or display of the Striped Products and any other products bearing designs that are confusingly similar to Gucci s blue-red-blue and green-red-green stripe marks, Gucci demanded in its February Demand Letter that Forever provide an accounting of all Striped Products sold and in inventory, as well as the identity and contact information for the persons or entities that designed, manufactured, and or distributed the Striped Products. Gucci further threatened to file an action against Forever to fully protect [Gucci s] valuable rights in the U.S. and abroad, if Forever did not comply with Gucci s demands.. Gucci s February Demand Letter further stated, We must hear from you or your counsel within five () business days to arrange Forever s compliance with the foregoing. -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0. To Forever s knowledge, Gucci has not yet filed suit against Forever and has not withdrawn its demand against Forever.. All of the Gucci Registrations feature three parallel stripes colored blue-red-blue or green-red-green.. Many clothing and accessory items adorned with decorative stripes colored blue-red-blue or green-red-green are sold by countless third parties.. Gucci should not be allowed to claim that Gucci, alone, has a monopoly on all blue-red-blue and green-red-green striped clothing and accessory items.. Consumers are not likely to be confused into believing the Striped Products sold in Forever s stores by Forever is manufactured by, sponsored by, authorized by, or otherwise associated or affiliated with Gucci. 0. Because Gucci continues to threaten to sue Forever if Forever has not caved to Gucci s demands, an immediate, justiciable case or controversy exists such that Forever is entitled to seek a declaratory judgment of noninfringement. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Declaration of Non-Infringement). Forever incorporates paragraphs through 0 herein by reference.. Forever s Striped Products display stripes in an ornamental, decorative, non-trademark manner. Additionally, or in the alternative, none of Forever s Striped Products is likely to cause confusion as to the source, sponsorship, or affiliation of the Forever products.. Forever s Striped Products items do not infringe any of the Gucci Registrations or any other trademark rights owned by Gucci.. An actual, present, and justiciable controversy has arisen between Gucci and Forever concerning the Striped Products. Gucci and Forever have adverse legal interests. Gucci has made clear to Forever Gucci s belief that its -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 trademark is currently being infringed by Forever s Striped Products, and Forever has denied any wrongdoing. The dispute between Forever and Gucci is substantial, definite and immediate, and not hypothetical.. A declaratory judgment of non-infringement should be entered in Forever s favor regarding the blue-red-blue and green-red-green striped design.. In order to resolve the legal and factual questions raised by Gucci and to afford relief from the uncertainty and controversy which Gucci s assertions have precipitated, Forever is entitled to a declaratory judgment of its rights under U.S.C. -0. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Cancellation of Federal Registration Nos. 0,, and for Lack of Secondary Meaning). Forever incorporates paragraphs through herein by reference.. Forever believes that it will be damaged by the continued registration of Registration Nos. 0,, and, and hereby petitions to cancel these registrations on the grounds that the marks that are the subject of these registrations lack secondary meaning. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Cancellation of Federal Registration Nos.,,,,, 0, 0,, and for Aesthetic Functionality). Forever incorporates paragraphs through herein by reference. 0. Forever believes that it will be damaged by the continued registration of Registration Nos.,,,,, 0, 0,, and, and hereby petitions to cancel these registrations on the grounds that the marks that are the subject of these registrations are aesthetically functional. -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Cancellation of Federal Registration Nos.,,,,, 0, 0,, and for Genericism). Forever incorporates paragraphs through 0 herein by reference.. Forever believes that it will be damaged by the continued registration of Registration Nos.,,,,, 0, 0,, and, and hereby petitions to cancel these registrations on the grounds that the marks that are the subject of these registrations are generic. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Denial of Federal Registration of Marks in USPTO Application Serial Nos.,,, 0, ). Forever incorporates paragraphs through herein by reference.. Forever believes that it will be damaged by the registration of the marks that are the subject of U.S. Application Serial Nos.,,, 0,, and hereby seeks denial of federal registration of these marks on the grounds that the marks that are the subject of these applications are not registrable for lack of secondary meaning.. Forever believes that it will be damaged by the registration of the marks that are the subject of U.S. Application Serial Nos.,,, 0,, and hereby seeks denial of federal registration of these marks on the grounds that the marks that are the subject of these applications are not registrable because they are aesthetically functional.. Forever believes that it will be damaged by the registration of the marks that are the subject of U.S. Application Serial Nos.,,, 0,, and hereby seeks denial of federal registration of -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 these marks on the grounds that the marks that are the subject of these applications are not registrable because they are generic. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Forever prays for the following relief:. A judgment declaring that (a) the blue-red-blue and green-red-green stripes on Forever s Striped Products are ornamental and do not serve a sourceidentifying function, and (b) Forever s Striped Products do not infringe any trademark rights owned by Gucci;. A judgment declaring that Forever has the right to use blue-red-blue and green-red-green stripes on products sold and offered for sale by Forever, free from interference by Gucci, its officers, agents, employees, attorneys, privies, representatives, successors and assigns, and any and all persons acting in active concert or participation with or under authority from Gucci;. A judgment ordering that Gucci, its officers, agents, employees, attorneys, privies, representatives, successors and assigns, and any and all persons in active concert or participation with or under authority from Gucci, be permanently enjoined from: a. Interfering with or threatening to interfere with the use of blue-redblue and green-red-green stripes by Forever, its related companies, successors or assigns, in connection with its or their business; b. Instituting or prosecuting any suit or other proceeding placing in issue the right of Forever or said related companies, successors or assigns to use the blue-red-blue and green-red-green stripes in connection with products sold or offered for sale by Forever ;. A judgment ordering the cancellation of Registration Nos.,,,,, 0, 0,, and ; -- Case No.

Case :-cv-00-fmo-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0. A judgment ordering the denial of registration of Application Serial Nos.,,, 0, ;. An award of costs in this action;. A finding that this case is exceptional within the meaning of U.S.C. and a corresponding award of attorneys fees in Forever s favor; and proper.. For such other, further, or different relief as the Court deems just and Dated: June, SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By /s/ Laura L. Chapman LAURA L. CHAPMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff FOREVER, INC. -- Case No.