Coral Reef Impacts of the 2005 Caribbean Bleaching Event. Global warming and El Niño have led to an increased frequency of coral bleaching since

Similar documents
Climate Change, Coral Bleaching and Florida s Coral Reefs: The Canaries are Dying. Dr. C. Mark Eakin NOAA Coral Reef Watch

ACCELERATING IMPACTS OF TEMPERATURE-INDUCED CORAL BLEACHING IN THE CARIBBEAN

Impacts of sunscreens on coral reefs

Mass Coral Bleaching in 2010 in the Southern Caribbean

INFORMATION DOCUMENT

Skin tear prevention

Clinical studies with patients have been carried out on this subject of graft survival and out of body time. They are:

Growth and Changing Directions of Indian Textile Exports in the aftermath of the WTO

Life Science Journal 2015;12(3s) A survey on knowledge about care label on garments by Residents in Egypt

AN INVESTIGATION OF LINTING AND FLUFFING OF OFFSET NEWSPRINT. ;, l' : a Progress Report MEMBERS OF GROUP PROJECT Report Three.

C. J. Schwarz Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University December 27, 2013.

Textile Per Capita Consumption

thermal Repair Beyond the Bond ProCutiGen Thermal Shield support + protect hair cuticle ProBonding, Keratin derived biomimetic, neo-cuticle

Unit 3 Hair as Evidence

The Multi- Ethnic Consumer. Jena Kinney Croda Inc

To Study the Effect of different income levels on buying behaviour of Hair Oil. Ragde Jonophar

SaBa NO s.d.~ H.D. 2 C.D. 1

Meredith Woolnough 92 X-RAY MAG : 64 : 2015

EVALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE OF TOOTH BLEACHING AMONG PATIENTS-A QUESTIONNARE BASED STUDY

TO STUDY THE RETAIL JEWELER S IMPORTANCE TOWARDS SELLING BRANDED JEWELLERY

Global Handbags Market

Indian Eyewear Industry Report

NGSBA Excavation Reports

Measurement Method for the Solar Absorptance of a Standing Clothed Human Body

The Americas IN Britain 2018 The Caribbean Edition Open Call for Caribbean-based curator

Hair loss results from numerous factors genetic pre-disposition, thyroid imbalance, Paper ID:

S051: Dilemmas in Skin Cancer Dilemmas Associated with Oxybenzone in Sunscreens

DIFFERENCES IN GIRTH MEASUREMENT OF BMI BASED AND LOCALLY AVALIABLE CATEGORIES OF SHIRT SIZES

Patients should be given information about skin reactions and self-care strategies. A recent UK survey found that:

PTTC/DOE/RPSEA Gas Shales Workshop Marcellus Shale Hydraulic Fracturing

Burrell Orchard 2014: Cleveland Archaeological Society Internship Amanda Ponomarenko The Ohio State University June - August 2014

NW Bicester Masterplan. Access and Travel Strategy Appendix 7 Traffic Impact

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Risks to the Mexican Textile Industry from trade liberalization effects of the end of. the Multi-Fiber Agreement. By Lenami Godinez. For: Dr.

Arundo and Biodiversity. (A win-lose situation)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Manufacturing 3 (2015 )

found identity rule out corroborate

ONLY. New Zealand has a shorter history of human habitation than any other country in the world. A Diverse and

Development of a Black Pearl Culture Industry in the RMI-Technical Assistance for Jewellery Training. Final Report

Higher National Unit specification. General information for centres. Jewellery: Practical Gemmology. Unit code: F3XJ 34

Consumer and Market Insights: Skincare Market in France. CT0027IS Sample Pages November 2014

Global Cosmetics Market Insights, Forecast to 2025

Clothing longevity and measuring active use

Foreword. by Charles Garrett

Curriculum Vitae. Publications. Refereed Academic Journals

Mexico and the Global Apparel Industry

ABSTRACT. NEWCOMB, ELIZABETH A. Body Shape Analysis of Hispanic Women in the United States. (Under the direction of Dr.

LARKHILL MARRIED QUARTERS ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR BY MARK KHAN

Liberalization of Textiles and Clothing Trade and Evolving Global and Indian Trade Scenario

Problem of Micro Enterprises in India- A Case Study of Firozabad Bangle

APPENDIX I. ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT STATE

ProCutiGen Hold Efficacy Data

US Denim Jeans Market Report

Because you re worth it: women s daily hair care routines in contemporary Britain

29 January Cullinan Grade versus Value Analysis. Background

Comparison of Women s Sizes from SizeUSA and ASTM D Sizing Standard with Focus on the Potential for Mass Customization

Hair Microscopy The comparison microscope is integral to trace evidence examinations. Two matching hairs identified with the comparison microscope

Mt RoseySapphires Building a global brand in Luxury Blue

SKIN CARE FORMULATION INCORPORATING SODIUM LACTATES, SODIUM PCA AND LAURYL PCA: COMPARATIVE MOISTURISING EFFICACY ON ASIAN SKIN

INFLUENCE OF FASHION BLOGGERS ON THE PURCHASE DECISIONS OF INDIAN INTERNET USERS-AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2006 Membership Survey: Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery

The use of chemical probes to assess the facial reactivity of women, comparing their self-perception of

TEOSYAL PEN: Personal experience after 12 months on 285 consecutive patients

Indian Cotton Textile Consumption in the Post-MFA Era

EMERGENTSKY RUSSIA AESTHETIC MEDICINE MARKET REPORT JUNE 2014

Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns (Protocol)

ADVANCED DIPLOMA OF BUSINESS BSB60215

Which Retailers Would Gain from a Sears Closure?

About the Report. Booming Women Apparel Market in India

PART 2 (Continued Provoost Presentation)

Each island tells a Story.

ABS Acai Sterols EFA Efficacy Data

Do all rough work in this book. Cross through any work you do not want to be marked.

Murdering Microbeads. Year 5

Case Study Example: Footloose

Beauty Loyalty Programs: Sephora Vs. Ulta

AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF INK AGE DETERMINATION BY A PRIVATE EXAMINER Erich J. Speckin

Abstract. Greer, Southwestern Wyoming Page San Diego

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF REVIVOGEN TOPICAL FORMULA FOR TREATMENT OF MEN AND WOMEN WITH ANDROGENETIC ALOPECIA. A PILOT STUDY

Global Diamond and Gemstone Market: Trends and Opportunities ( ) March 2015

Case study example Footloose

2. The US Apparel and Footwear Market Size by Personal Consumption Expenditure,

Poster Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; 2 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Skillman, NJ

Does geographic ancestry influence how skin ages? Abigail K Langton PhD Centre for Dermatology Research The University of Manchester

Perm African type hair

Presentation Objectives

Chapman Ranch Lint Cleaner Brush Evaluation Summary of Fiber Quality Data "Dirty" Module 28 September 2005 Ginning Date

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPERMARKET SHOPPERS IN JAKARTA

Original language: English CoP17 Doc. 52 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Statistical Analysis Of Chinese Urban Residents Clothing Consumption

SPECIAL Tattoos. BfR Consumer MONITOR

Sun Protection Policy

Spun: Adventures in Textiles Programming Guide

Just look at those numbers. These significant results are sure to impress your customers looking for effective age-fighting products.

Company Profile 2017

Footwear market in the Visegrad Group countries and the Republic of Croatia

The lithic assemblage from Kingsdale Head (KH09)

Cosmetic Industry in Figures

PIGEON COVE, LABRADOR Lisa Rankin Memorial University of Newfoundland

THE IDEA OF NECESSITY: SHOPPING TRENDS AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS. Halie Olszowy;

Transcription:

Coral Reef Impacts of the 2005 Caribbean Bleaching Event Abstract Global warming and El Niño have led to an increased frequency of coral bleaching since the 1980s. In late 2005, elevated seawater temperatures resulted in an extensive Caribbean bleaching event. While this event was not as geographically extensive as the 1997-1998 bleaching event in the IndoPacific, regarded as the largest and most damaging bleaching event to date, both maximum seawater temperature and temporal duration of the Caribbean event were similar to those measured in the 1997-98 IndoPacific event. Coral reef surveys conducted in 16 countries by Reef Check teams before, during and after the Caribbean bleaching event revealed that significant coral bleaching but relatively low mortality occurred as compared to the 1997-98 IndoPacific bleaching event. Caribbean bleaching ranged from 4-62% and mortality from 0-27%, whereas bleaching levels neared 100% and mortality reached as high as 95% in many locations following the IndoPacific bleaching event. While bleaching was extensive in Belize, Jamaica, St. Lucia and the British Virgin Islands, mortality was not significant in these areas. By using a standardized approach to monitor and quantify bleaching for the past 10 years, the Reef Check data are useful to help track and compare reef impacts on a regional and global basis. As the threat of global warming to coral reefs increases, it would be wise to invest in a more complete network of surveys to aid in monitoring large-scale environmental stressors and their impacts on coral reefs.

Introduction Hurricanes, El Nino, disease outbreaks, bleaching and other stressors caused by human impacts have increased coral mortality throughout the world in the past 25 years (Bruno et al. 2001, Mumby et al. 2001, Aronson et al 2002). Although there are many factors responsible for coral mortality, bleaching has been regarded as the major agent of change responsible in both the widespread mortality of corals as well as changes in coral reef community structures (Bruno et al 2001, Diaz-Pulido G and LJ McCook 2002). Large-scale bleaching is predominantly triggered by elevations in sea surface temperatures and in recent years there have been unprecedented increases in sea surface temperatures in many areas of the tropical oceans (Goreau et al 2000, Loya et al. 2001, McClanahan 2004). The largest global bleaching event on record occurred in 1998 where ocean temperatures reached levels of up to 2.8 C above normal and lasted for periods of days to even months (Goreau et al. 2000, Loya et al 2001). The results of this El Nino related temperature increase were catastrophic for many coral reefs. Coral mortality was near 100% in the Indian Ocean and 80% in areas of the Great Barrier Reef (Wilkinson 1998, Goreau et al. 2000, Obura 2005). Areas of the Caribbean were affected by this bleaching event as well, but escaped the massive estimates of mortality as seen in the rest of the tropical oceans. Although few areas such as Belize and the Cayman Islands experienced extensive bleaching and mortality, coral mortality across the Caribbean ranged from only 5-10% (Wilkinson 1998, Goreau et al 2000, Aronson et al 2002). In 2005 another large-scale bleaching event occurred, this time centered in the Caribbean Sea. Temperature elevations and temporal duration of the 2005 bleaching

event matched those recorded in the 1998 bleaching event (NOAA satellite observations). In this study we attempt to ascertain the impacts of this recent bleaching event. Using standardized Reef Check coral reef survey methods, we will compare bleaching estimates before, during and after this major Caribbean bleaching event to determine the extent of coral bleaching and mortality on two spatial scales: localized, country-based estimates and large-scale estimates of the greater Caribbean Sea. Materials and Methods Study Sites: Over 185 benthic surveys were conducted between January 2004 and June 2006 in 16 different countries and territories. These locations include: Belize, Honduras, Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Florida, the Bahamas, Dominica, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, the British Virgin Islands, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the Netherland Antilles, and the US Virgin Islands. Survey Design: Surveys were conducted using the globally standardized Reef Check survey methods. Each site survey contains 4 replicates of a 20x5 meter band transect survey for fish and invertebrates as well as a 20 meter uniform point contact survey for substrate types. Details of the survey design and methodology can be found in Hodgson 1999. Bleaching estimates in these surveys were categorized by both percentage of each coral colony bleached (colony bleaching) and percentage of overall corals bleached (population bleaching) within the band transect. For the purposes of this study, survey depths were

categorized into 2 broad reef depths: shallow reefs (2-6 meters) and deep reefs (6-12 meters). Greater Caribbean bleaching estimates: To ascertain the impacts of coral bleaching resulting from the 2005 Caribbean bleaching event survey dates were lumped into three distinct time periods. The Before time period determines baseline bleaching levels prior to the major bleaching event; the During time period spans from the onset of elevated seawater temperatures to the time when temperatures resume to normal ranges while the After time period includes all surveys that have taken place once seawater temperatures resumed to normal levels Caribbean wide. The specific dates for these time periods are as follows: Before time period dates range between January 1 st 2004 and July 31 st 2005; During incorporates surveys from August 1 st thru December 31 st 2005 and After includes surveys conducted from January 1 st thru May 15 th 2006. To gauge large-scale impacts of this bleaching event all locations listed above were lumped to form a greater Caribbean estimate of coral bleaching and mortality. Means of each time period were determined and analyzed using ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey comparisons for estimates of coral population bleaching, colony bleaching and hard coral abundances. Comparisons of the two depth categories were analyzed for both colony bleaching and population bleaching using two-sample T-tests. Mortality estimates were devised using a ratio of recently killed coral (RKC) to total coral cover, where total coral cover is defined as live hard coral cover plus recently killed coral. Estimates of this mortality index were analyzed by ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey comparisons to determine differences among time periods.

Country-based bleaching estimates: Analyses of bleaching impacts were conducted for specific countries as well as the greater Caribbean. Multiple surveys conducted in Belize, Jamaica, St. Lucia and the British Virgin Islands allowed for bleaching analyses to be conducted by country. Time periods are identical to the greater Caribbean bleaching estimates described previously. All analyses were conducted using ANOVA tests with post-hoc Tukey comparisons to determine differences between time periods. Estimates of mortality follow the same fashion as outlined above. Results Greater Caribbean bleaching estimates On a Caribbean-wide basis, the effects of the 2005 bleaching event were significant. Coral bleaching ranged from 2-62% as a result of the bleaching event. The percentage of coral populations bleached increased significantly as a result of the Caribbean bleaching event (figure 1; ANOVA F 2,187 =26.73; P<0.001). Post-hoc Tukey comparisons revealed that each time period differed significantly from the others. Comparisons of both coral colony bleaching and coral population bleaching by depth category revealed no significant differences between deep and shallow reefs (figure 2; coral colony t-test: t 1,160 =0.82; P=0.41 coral population t-test: t 1,169 =0.15; P=0.88). While the bleaching of corals was significant, overall hard coral cover did not differ significantly as a result of the bleaching event (figure 3; ANOVA F 2,182 =0.54; P=0.59). Of the corals that did succumb to bleaching, mortality was significant (figure 4; ANOVA F 2,182 =5.71; P=0.004) with approximately 4-15% mortality Caribbean-wide. Post-hoc

Tukey comparisons reveal mortality levels were significantly greater in the after period than in either the before or during time periods. Country-based bleaching estimates Belize Both percent coral colony bleaching and percent coral population bleaching were marginally significant as a result of the 2005 Caribbean bleaching event (figure 5; coral colony ANOVA F 2,23 =3.25; P=0.06; figure 6; coral population ANOVA F 2,23 =3.18; P=0.06). Although bleaching among corals was marginally significant in Belize, the percent hard coral cover remained the same among time periods (figure 7; ANOVA F 2,23 =2.00; P=0.16). Mortality estimates were also non-significant among the time periods (figure 8; ANOVA F 2,23 =2.16; P=0.14). Jamaica The percentage of coral populations bleached in Jamaica were significant as a result of the Caribbean bleaching event (figure 6; ANOVA F 2,42 =3.32; P=0.05). Post-hoc Tukey comparisons reveal bleaching of the coral populations were significantly higher during the bleaching event than before the event. Coral colony bleaching was also significantly higher during the bleaching event than before (figure 5; ANOVA F 4,41 =4.97; P=0.01; post-hoc Tukey comparisons). Hard coral cover was significantly reduced after the bleaching event (figure 7; ANOVA F 2,47 =6.49; P=0.003; post-hoc Tukey comparisons). Although coral cover was significantly reduced, coral mortality as a result of the bleaching event was not significant (figure 8; ANOVA F 2,47 =1.07; P=0.35). St. Lucia

St. Lucia experienced massive coral colony and population bleaching as a result of the bleaching event (figure 5; coral colony ANOVA F 1,9 =52.5; P<0.001; figure 6; coral population ANOVA F 1,11 =51.16; P<0.001). Both coral colony bleaching and coral population bleaching were significantly higher during the bleaching event than after the event (post-hoc Tukey comparisons). While bleaching was significant, no significant change percent hard coral cover was observed (figure 7; ANOVA F 1,12 =0.09; P=0.77). Mortality estimates conducted were also found to be non-significant (figure 8; ANOVA F 1,12 =0.71; P=0.42). British Virgin Islands Coral colony and coral population bleaching was found to be extensive in BVI as a result of the Caribbean bleaching event (figure 5; coral colony ANOVA F 2,21 =22.0; P<0.001; figure 6; coral population ANOVA F= 2,21 =72.01; P<0.001). Bleaching in both individual colonies and the population as a whole was found to be significantly higher during and after the bleaching event than before the event (post-hoc Tukey comparisons). Even though coral bleaching was extensive in BVI, there was no overall change in hard coral cover (figure 7; ANOVA F 2,21 =1.24; P=0.31). As with hard coral cover, there was no change in the mortality estimates as a result of the Caribbean bleaching event (figure 8; ANOVA F 2,21 =1.2; P=0.32). Discussion The coral bleaching event in 1997-98 resulted in catastrophic coral bleaching and mortality in the Indo-Pacific region. Caribbean regions experienced lesser impacts

ranging from severe (Belize) to insignificant (southern and eastern Caribbean) as a result of this event (Wilkinson 1998). Similar trends in bleaching and mortality were observed in the Caribbean as a result of the 2005 coral bleaching event. While overall bleaching was high (up to 62% overall with some reefs experiencing 100%), mortality was relatively low, ranging from 4-15%. High levels of bleaching with lesser levels of mortality are becoming apparent as a general trend for the Caribbean region with regards to large scale bleaching events, as evidenced in the last two major events. Proposed mechanisms to this rely on the resistance and resiliency of the coral species themselves. Massive or mounding corals such as poritids and faviids are less susceptible to the effects of bleaching than branching corals such as acroporids and pocilloporids (Marshall and Baird 2000, Loya et al. 2001, Kayanne et al. 2002, Douglas 2003). As the Indo-Pacific is dominated by branching corals and the Caribbean by mounding corals, it is understandable why higher coral bleaching and mortality estimates are found in the Indo-Pacific and comparatively lower levels of mortality in the Caribbean. Another key mechanism is the frequency in which elevated seawater temperatures that cause bleaching are experienced by the coral colonies. Caribbean corals undergo more frequent increases in temperatures than corals do in the Pacific and it is likely that these Caribbean corals have become more adapted to elevated temperatures and are thus more resistant to bleaching as a result of temperature flux (Aronson et al 2002, Douglas 2003, West and Salm 2003).

Literature Cited Aronson R.B., W.F. Precht, M.A. Toscano, K.H. Koltes. 2002. The 1998 bleaching event and its aftermath on a coral reef in Belize. Marine Biology 141: 435-447. Bruno J.F., C.E. Siddon, J.D. Witman, P.L. Colin, M.A. Toscano. 2001. El Nino related coral bleaching in Palau, Western Caroline Islands. Coral Reefs 20: 127-136. Diaz-Pulido G. and L.J. McCook. 2002. The fate of bleached corals: patterns and dynamics of algal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 232: 115-128. Douglas A.E. 2003. Coral bleaching how and why? Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 385-392. Hodgson G. 1999. A global assessment of human effects on coral reefs. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38(5): 345-355. Goreau T., T. McClanahan, R. Hayes, A. Strong. 2000. Conservation of coral reefs after the 1998 global bleaching event. Conservation Biology 14(1): 5-15. Kayanne H., S. Harii, Y. Ide and F. Akimoto. 2002. Recovery of coral populations after the 1998 bleaching on Shiraho Reef, in the southern Ryukyus, NW Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress Series 239: 93-103. Loya Y., K. Sakai, K. Yamazato, Y. Nakano, H. Sambali, R. van Woesik. 2001. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecology Letters (2001) 4: 122-131. Marshall, P.A. and A.H. Baird. 2000. Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs 19: 155-163. McClanahan T.R. 2004. The relationship between bleaching and mortality of common corals. Marine Biology 144: 1239-1245.

Mumby P.J., J.R.M. Chisholm, A.J. Edwards, C.D. Clark, E.B. Roark, S. Andrefouet, J. Jaubert. 2001. Unprecedented bleaching-induced mortality in Porites spp. at Rangiroa Atoll, French Polynesia. Marine Biology 139: 183-189. Obura D.O. 2005. Resilience and climate change: lessons from coral reefs and bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Esturaine, Coastal and Shelf Science 63: 353-372. West J.M. and R.V. Salm. Resistance and resilience to coral bleaching: implications for coral reef conservation and management. Conservation Biology 17(4): 956-967. Wilkinson C. 1998. Status of the coral reefs of the world: 1998. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Cape Ferguson, Queensland and Dampier, Western Australia.

Figures Figure 1: Mean percent hard coral bleaching for greater Caribbean. Figure represents means +/- one standard error. Figure 2: Mean percent hard coral bleaching by depth category for greater Caribbean. Figure represents means +/- one standard error.

Figure 3: Mean percent living hard coral for greater Caribbean. Figure represents means +/- one standard error. Figure 4: Mean mortality index (hard coral / hard coral + recently killed coral) for greater Caribbean. Figure represents means +/- one standard error.

Figure 5: Mean percent hard coral colony bleaching per designated country. Figure represents means +/- one standard error. Figure 6: Mean percent hard coral population bleaching per designated country. Figure represents means +/- one standard error

Figure 7: Mean percent live hard coral per designated country. Figure represents means +/- one standard error. Figure 8: Mean mortality index (hard coral / hard coral + recently killed coral) per designated country. Figure represents means +/- one standard error.