COSMETICS REFORM EXPLAINED

Similar documents
Society of Cosmetic Chemists. Robert Ross-Fichtner SCC Toronto April 6, 2016

FDA ISSUES 12/19/2012 SPECIFIC PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS ISSUES

REGISTRATIONS APPROVALS LISTINGS PREPARING FOR US FDA INSPECTIONS 483 RESPONSES

Will FDA Get New Authority to Regulate Cosmetics?

REFORM THE QUASI-DRUG APPROVAL SYSTEM

ASKANESTHETICIAN'S BLOG. What Are Cosmeceuticals? January 17, categories. 1 de 6 02/09/ :00 ABOUT

REFORM THE QUASI-DRUG APPROVAL SYSTEM

REFORM THE QUASI-DRUG APPROVAL SYSTEM

September 23, Dear Dr. Hamburg:

Evaluation of Cosmeceutical Ingredients: What the Label May Not Reveal Patrick Bitter, MD. Regulation of Topical Skin Care Products.

Sunscreens their special and unique non-gmp requirements. Dusanka Sabic Regulatory Reform Director, Accord Australasia November 2017

House Bill 2587 Sponsored by Representative BARNHART (Presession filed.)

Restrictions on the Manufacture, Import, and Sale of Personal Care and Cosmetics Products Containing Plastic Microbeads. Overview

H 7915 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3409

HOUSE BILL lr0994 A BILL ENTITLED. State Board of Cosmetology Natural Hair Care Stylist Licensure

House Bill 3409 Ordered by the Senate May 21 Including House Amendments dated April 17 and Senate Amendments dated May 21 to resolve conflicts

University of Wisconsin-Madison Hazard Communication Standard Policy Dept. of Environment, Health & Safety Office of Chemical Safety

Cosmetic product claims

Chinese Cosmetic Regulations Updates: How Will it Affect the Exports of Korean Cosmetics

www k. b o d opro ucts.com

SA The standard. Requirements

Dr. Matteo Zanotti Russo

Lead in Cosmetic Lip Products and Externally Applied Cosmetics: Recommended Maximum

FACTS. about MemoryGel silicone gel-filled breast implants

Regulation of Sunscreens in Australia

BELINDA CASTLES SUNSCREEN SUMMIT 19 TH MARCH 2018

Chemical Inspection and Regulation Service (CIRS)

A Bill Regular Session, 2007 SENATE BILL 276

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 3409

Overview of Cosmetic Regulatory Status and Trends in China

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

Regulation of Cosmetics in Korea. Chin SooYoung Consulting

Germanna Community College Policy 70210: Hazard Communication Plan

Product Information File & Cosmetic Product Safety Report

How Signet Leads: Driving Integrity in the Global Jewelry Supply Chain By Virginia C. Drosos, Chief Executive Officer, Signet Jewelers

Understanding the Cosmetic Products Regulation 1223/2009 and REACH

EU position on cosmetics in TTIP Comparison between 2014 and 2015 versions

Latest Regulation changes in Asia

Understanding the Retail Sale of Cosmetics

Cosmetic Defined in FD&C Act, Section 201 (i) Articles intended for: Cleansing Beautifying Promoting attractiveness Altering the appearance Excludes S

CCS Administrative Procedure T Biosafety for Laboratory Settings

Full of Marketing, Full of Vision

AiA Art News-service

HOUSE BILL lr1954 A BILL ENTITLED. State Board of Cosmetologists Licensing Hair Braiders, Cosmetology Assistants, and Microdermabrasion

Implementation of GHS Amendment to OSHA HCS American Bakers Association Safety Committee Meeting May 8, 2012

SKACHB14 SQA Unit Code H9CT 04 Provide client consultation services

Chemical Peels Corporate Medical Policy

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on product claims made based on common criteria in the field of cosmetics

Intravenous Access and Injections Through Tattoos: Safety and Guidelines

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

PIF Introduction Including Safety Assessment

REACH AND ITS IMPACT ON COSMETICS

Jaychem Industries Ltd 9/4/15

化妆品监督管理条例. Regulations concerning the Supervision and Administration over Cosmetics (Draft) Translated by Chemlinked

As Introduced. 129th General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No A B I L L

Confidence in Cosmetics

ALUTIIQ MUSEUM & ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY 215 Mission Road, Suite 101! Kodiak, Alaska 99615! ! FAX EXHIBITS POLICY

(1 rwa. Personal CareNProducts Council. Kristen Hardin. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration

Hazard and Exposure Screening Methods for HPV Categories: Amine Oxides a Case Study

As Introduced. 130th General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No A B I L L

FDA Regulation of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products

Hazard Communication and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) John Frowd, CAS USDOL-OSHA Manhattan Area Office

CONTRACT MANUFACTURING OEM & ODM SERVICES

Hazard Communication Program

Clinical Policy: Lindane Shampoo Reference Number: CP.PMN.09 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: Oregon Health Plan

Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration Rule Comments

Clean Clothes Campaign Wage Survey

Hazard Communication and the Tennessee Right-to-Know Law. 29 CFR CFR TDL Rule

Notice of Proposed Rule

Global Cosmetics Regulations

I wanted to take this moment to respond to your inquiries on ingredient safety.

VTCT Level 2 NVQ Award in Providing Pedicure Services

Sun Protection Policy

VTCT Level 3 NVQ Award in Airbrush Make-Up

How Honest is the Honest Company? Gabrielle Husen White Paper Comm 204 University of Wisconsin Whitewater, WI

To provide a policy that documents John Street s approach to identification, exclusion and treatment of head lice.

Written Program. for. Hazard Communication

No More Dirty Looks. Personal Care Products and Ways to Cut Your Exposure, Teach Others, and Push for Chemical Policy Reform

Signet Responsible Sourcing Protocol For Diamonds. Ensuring The Integrity Of The Natural Diamond Supply Chain. April 18, 2017

Food Industry Skin Safety


Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

To provide a policy that documents John Street s approach to identification, exclusion, and treatment of head lice.

Assessment Record. VTCT Level 4 Certificate in. Enhancing Eyebrows with. Microblading Techniques BT4C2. Learner name: Learner number: 603/1305/5

ANEC position on claim of defective standard

SKACHB9 SQA Unit Code H9CE 04 Advise and consult with clients

We understand that a competitor has raised the following issues which we will address in this letter.

C_005 - Introduction to the Globally Harmonized System of Hazard Communication

RESEARCH PERMIT SIGN-OFF SHEET. The attached research application has been reviewed by the individuals below with recommendations as follows:

SRL : FINAL REPORT March 22, EF Expected Static SPF 20. Non-randomized, with blinded evaluations

Restrictions on the Manufacture, Import, and Sale of Personal Care and Cosmetics Products Containing Plastic Microbeads.

February 22, Dear Ms. Hardin,

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 382. Short Title: Mobile Beauty Salons. (Public)

H 7626 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2001 H 1 HOUSE BILL 635. March 15, 2001

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII Community Colleges ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICE HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Sample Copy. Not for Distribution.

THE EUROPEAN UNION S REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR COSMETICS

FDA Update. What s New? FDA Reorganization 9/13/2012. FDA Reorganization Role of Third Parties in Ensuring Supply Chain Integrity

Transcription:

COSMETICS REFORM EXPLAINED

2 BACKGROUND/ INTRO

3 Background/Intro At the Johnson & Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies, we recognize that consumer confidence is more than a formula, which is why we support the modernization of a law that will update the U.S. Food and Drug Administration s (FDA) regulatory authority over cosmetics and personal care products, reinforcing peace of mind to consumers. The Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies supports the Personal Care Products Safety Act by Senators Feinstein (D-CA) and Collins (R-ME) and we welcome the opportunity to work with Congress and U.S. FDA to better serve consumers and the public health. Our support for personal care products safety reform is characterized in three principles. We believe that in order to best serve consumers, families, healthcare professionals, as well as our employees and the public, we need a regulatory framework for cosmetics that is consistent, reflects modern science and advancements in personal care product technology. We recognize that any company that makes cosmetics or personal care products has a responsibility to ensure its products are safe and that the U.S. FDA oversight is an important confirmation of product safety. For that reason, we believe the U.S. FDA is the best authority for determining and enhancing the health and well-being of American consumers by regulating the safety of ingredients and enforcing standards for cosmetics and personal care products. Nothing is more important to us than the safety of consumers and maintaining their trust in our products. Our support for personal care product safety reform is aimed at removing consumer doubt about the safety of these products and reassuring consumer s peace of mind everywhere our products are sold. Enhancing the U.S. FDA s regulatory authority would allow the agency to keep pace with innovative technologies, consumer expectations, and provide added protections for the public health.

4 Cosmetics v. Personal Care Products? WHAT S THE DIFFERENCE?

5 According to the Federal Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act defines cosmetics by their intended use, as: articles intended to be rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body...for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance According to the U.S. FDA, the term personal care product is not defined in the regulations. In fact, people often use the term personal care products to refer to everyday products like shampoos, facial cleansers, toothpaste, or moisturizers. While the term cosmetics refers to color cosmetics, such as make up, mascaras, and lipsticks, both personal care products and color cosmetics are regulated as cosmetics by the FDA. If some of these products make a therapeutic claim, they then are regulated as drugs, like acne creams, sunscreens, and even antiperspirants. It is possible that some personal care products meet the definition of both a cosmetic and a drug. For example, a mouthwash containing fluoride is a cosmetic/drug combination, as is anti-dandruff shampoo, face wash containing salicylic acid to treat acne or anti-itch creams that contain hydrocortisone. These products that we commonly find in the health and beauty sections of drug and department stores are technically cosmetics, but the term personal care product is used to define the broader category of products.

6 WHAT WE SUPPORT

7 What We Support Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies is committed to working with regulatory bodies, policy makers, industry, healthcare professionals and consumers to continue improving cosmetic regulations to best serve the public health and give consumers confidence. We support a federal framework for the regulation of personal care products that will significantly update U.S. cosmetic regulation that was originally written more than 70 years. WE SUPPORT LEGISLATION THAT WOULD:»» require manufacturing facility registration»» require manufacturers to report adverse events to the FDA»» create basic manufacturing practice requirements»» grant the FDA mandatory recall authority»» grant the FDA access to ingredient and product safety records»» require complete label information on products sold online»» require the FDA to evaluate at least five ingredients a year and issue guidance on their safety and appropriate use WE ALSO SUPPORT THE U.S. FDA AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THE SAFETY OF COSMETIC INGREDIENTS. We advocate for legislation that specifies FDA standards on individual ingredients would preempt action on those same ingredients at the state level, in order to avoid conflicting regulations across the country.

8 CURRENT REGULATIONS

9 Current Regulations How are personal care products in the US Regulated today? Since 1938, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act has provided the FDA with the authority to regulate cosmetics and personal care products. Currently, the U.S. regulatory framework is a complex system of federal & state government regulations, various court rulings, scientific guidelines, independent safety reviews and industry-self-regulation. There are essentially three main components to the current US cosmetic regulatory system: US FDA In 1938, Congress passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, giving authority to the U.S. FDA to oversee the safety of food, drugs, and cosmetics. FDA s authority over cosmetics is different from their authority over other products they regulate, such as pharmaceutics or medical devices. Cosmetic Ingredient Review The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) was established in 1976 by the industry trade association with the support of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Consumer Federation of America. The CIR is the industry-funded panel that ensures the safety of the ingredients used in cosmetics today. Its meetings are open to the public and its findings and minutes are publicly available on its website. Consumer Commitment Code In 2007, the Personal Care Products Council adopted the Consumer Commitment Code for the cosmetic industry. The code builds on the safety standards published by the CIR and adds new responsibilities including reporting of the Safety Information Summary Program that makes cosmetic product and ingredient safety information readily available to the FDA upon request, and adverse event reporting to the FDA.

10 OUR SAFETY STANDARDS

11 Our Safety Standards We hold that personal care products are among the safest category of products regulated by the U.S. FDA. The agency already has authority to ensure the safety of personal care products today, but clarifying that authority and the information it receives provides additional protection and confidence for the public. While the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regulates our products, at Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies, our products are designed to meet the strictest safety standards wherever our products are sold. We also follow scientific and evidence-based guidelines where best practices are encouraged in complementary fashion to existing regulatory and legal requirements.

12 At the Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies, we meet and exceed standards for developing personal care products and here are a few examples of how we do it: We take responsibility in ensuring the safety of all our products, taking them through our five-level safety assurance process. We conduct specific tests to demonstrate the safety of individual products and their ingredients. We regularly share our safety information with health authorities like the US FDA. We register our products with US FDA. Most importantly, we voluntarily report adverse events and make those reports available to the US FDA.

Our heritage as a healthcare company inspires us to maintain the highest standards and approach developing personal care products from a scientific & evidence-based perspective. 13

14 CLOSING

15 Closing Johnson & Johnson Family of Consumer Companies is committed to working with regulatory bodies, policy makers, industry, healthcare professionals and consumers to continue improving cosmetic regulations to best serve the public health and give consumers confidence. We support the Personal Care Products Safety Act sponsored by Senators Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Susan Collins (R-ME) and we urge Congress to pass this legislation.

This information is intended for use by residents of the United States only.