July 13, c. G. FERRARIET AL 2,324,203 MULTIPLE FLOUR BLEACHING PROCESS Filed Aug. 16, 1940 AAA I i:3f --- S s. 2,777. ZZ.

Similar documents
Dec. 15, 1964 KA. M. LEW 3,161,333 SHIRT FOLDING MACHINE INVENTOR. Mé2/ 4% ZAA/ "And E?aeter 27722/2 Y.6

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,526,488 Krull 45) Date of Patent: Jul. 2, 1985

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,843,717 Crane 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 4, 1989

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,308,717 B1

WWWWW. ( 12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub. No.: US 2017 / A1. 19 United States

AAAAAO Y MAAwa W4WGAAATHIS. July 4, 97. D., P. ESERSEK E Ai. 3,520,31 AAP/ASA ASAA. A77OAweys WWMAW7OAS

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

Nov. 18, 1969 J. B. MARTN, JR 3,478,754 APPLICATOR FOR FALSE EYELASHES

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,996,780 Gurrera (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 7, 1999

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,108,948 B2

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

United States Patent (19) Frankel

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,752,627 B2

June 1, F. V. SCHEMER 2,082,263 POWER OFERATED TWEE7, ERS INVENTOR. Ag/c/ p/6ca7/e/77e/ ATTORNEY.

III USOO A. 1212,515 l/1917 Leavitt... 5/636 1, /1929 Jonas... 5/ ,000 3/1933 Van Slyck... 5/697

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

United States Patent (19) Steinback

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

III. United States Patent 19 Jordan 5,389,129. Feb. 14, ). WAXPOLISH COMPOSITION 75 Inventor: Martin P. Jordan, Orpington, 73) Assignee:

United States Patent (19) Katz

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7434,929 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1

Ref. 11. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1. (19) United States. Polstein et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun.

(No Model.) 2 Sheets-Sheet 1. F. C. RUFFHEAD & E. J. SCHEER. ADJUSTABLE BICYCLE PARASOL AND SUPPORT, No. 555,025, Patented Feb. 18, A.

United States Patent (19) Hunt

IXPER 75C Calcium Peroxide. Dough Conditioner. Application Data Sheet

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,422,036 B1. Giannis et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 23, 2002

United States Patent (19) Beczak, Sr. et al.

United States Patent (19) Humbrecht

United States Patent (19) Garth

United States Patent (11) 3,591,863

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1. Reynolds et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 15, 2004

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,793,880 B2

TECHNICAL BULLETIN BATCH BLEACHING OF NONWOVEN COTTON FABRICS

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

Int. Cl."... F21V1/06 U.S. C /352; 362/358. References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 3,787,676 l/1974 Korach /352

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,364,491 B2

BLEACHING OF SOFTWOOD KRAFT PULP WITH OXYGEN AND PEROXIDE

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

Oil-Free vs. Lubricated Compressors in Food Applications

TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS HELMET (TCH)

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,918,897 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1

IIII. United States Patent (19) McCausland. cover removably attached to the outer edge of said

~Nov. 27, ,693,515 M. S. JOYNER PERMANENT WAVING MACHINE. Filgd May 16, 1928 s Sheets-Sheet 1. q _ v mmvron 0/ r 3 w/ A TTORNWS

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,841,523 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

TECHNICAL INFORMATION

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 6,257,248 B1 Yeh (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 10, 2001

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

United States Patent (19) Winter

Extrusion of Cosmetic Products

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

Material Safety Data Sheet

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) Schunter

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 6,971,424 B1. Angevine (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 6, (54) INTERCHANGEABLE HANDBAG 4,112,991 A 9/1978 Barbaresi...

WHAT IS GEL ELECTROPHORESIS?

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.427,133 B2

Trailwind Rd., Poway, Calif ; 5. 5,1. ity

United States Patent (19) Costanzo

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.407, B2

Europaisches Patentamt European Patent Office. Publication number: Office europeen des brevets EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

OSBORNE Y COMPANIA S.A., Opposer, INTER PARTES CASE NO. 1891

Luminant Review - The Best Solution For Removing. Do You Want A Glowing Beautiful Skin? Available In United States Only

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

tech 66 General Statements Regarding the Chemical Resistance of nora Floor Coverings

BodyBare Perfection. Instruction Booklet. cordless epilator & shaver with manual precission tweezers AP17LTR

United States Patent (19)

Colour 2 Advanced. COLOUR 1 INTRODUCTION TO COLOUR Colour

Why is pretreatment needed

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

(*) Notice: Slity sight 58 $5 E. G.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,585,200 B1

(12) Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 7,392,925 B1 Arnoth (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 1, 2008

TRIM CLEANING SECTION 10 INDEX INTRODUCTION GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS CLEANING FABRICS WITH VOLATILE CLEANERS. Page

United States Patent (19) Sanchez

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,774,893 Torres (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 7, 1998

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

Transcription:

July 13, 1943. c. G. FERRARIET AL MULTIPLE FLOUR BLEACHING PROCESS Filed Aug. 16, 1940 MEN A. 3s,333 is AAA I 7777 i:3f EN.ht --- f -S Q& Y IS +-Is S s L3 S.E.1 S s. s S S. IS A al P 2,777. ZZ EN 22 s Nez2,323S2 zzz3s 3. Q) 2. R &E s Q %3 %32 p 3. ENESIS Ng3RS V % K. S. 2,3N is 8 'SS$ 2 S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SaSNYASLsays 2 4229 G-77ey270272 N NJ S S. N 77ve/222 Z S y (S N s 74/7 S2277/27/2O7

Patented July 13, 1943 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE MULTIPLE FLOUR BLEACHING PROCESS 4 Claims. The present invention relates tu the improve ment of wheat flour and other edible finely di vided milled products, including the color, bak ing, and keeping qualities thereof and more par ticularly has reference to processes for the bleaching and ageing or maturing of flour and the like. The principal object of our invention is to provide a process for the production of a bleached Charles G. Ferrari, Minneapolis, and Willis S. Hutchinson, St. Paul, Minn., assignors to Gen eral Mills, Inc., a corporation of Delaware Application August 16, 1940, Serial No. 32,910 four of excellent color without either adversely affecting its baking properties or its keeping qualities. Another object of our invention is to provide a bleaching process for flour and the like in which Smaller quantities of bleaching agents are re quired for the bleaching and maturing operation than would be required according to the usual commercial bleaching methods. A further object of our invention is to provide a bleaching process for flour and the like which will enable baked goods of greater volume to be produced from the flour bleached by our process than would be produced from flour bleached by conventional bleaching methods. A still further object of our invention is to. provide a process for the multiple bleaching and maturing of wheat flour and other edible finely divided milled products which comprises expos ing flour or other finely divided products while agitated in a finely divided state to the action of a gaseous bleaching agent for a sufficient length of time and at a sufficient partial pressure of the gas to at least partially bleach the flour or other finely divided product and then exposing the flour or other finely divided product while agi tated in a finely divided state to the action of a Second gaseous bleaching agent of a similar or different nature than that used in the first bleaching operation, for a sufficient length of time and at a sufficient partial pressure of the gas to completely bleach and mature the flour or other edible finely divided product, These and other objects, as will hereinafter appear, are accomplished by this invention which may be practiced in apparatus shown in the ac Companying drawing in which Figure 1 is a vertical section through a double compartment agitator with suitable seals for the gas; and Fig. 2 is a transverse section on the line 2-2 of Fig. 1. The foregoing figures illustrate a type of ap paratus for carrying out the present invention. It consists essentially of an agitator having a housing O with a central horizontal partition f dividing the agitator into. upper and lower com partments 2 and 13, respectively. Upper and... lowerishafts f4 and are journalled in suitable bearingsåcarried by the partition housing, the lower shaft being driven by means of a belt (C. 99-232) 10 3 40 4 f6 and a pulley.. This shaft in turn has a pulley 8 which drives a pulley 9 on the shaft 4 by means of a belt. The shaft 4 carries a series of paddles 24 which serve to beat the flour and to help keep it in Suspension in the air of the upper compart ment. This shaft also carries a series of pro peller blades 2 which cause the flour on the partition to be moved from left to right as will presently be more fully explained. Similarly, the shaft is provided with paddles 26 and with propeller blades 27, the latter, how ever, being set reversely to the blades 2 so as to propel the flour resting on the bottom a from right to left. -. Flour is fed to the agitator by means of a chute which is provided with a flour seal 3 to pre vent gas within the compartment 2 from pass ing up through this chute. Thus flour is delivered to the agitator at the left-hand end of the shaft 4 and is propelled to the right. The diluted gas for bleaching in the compart ment 2 is supplied thereto through a pipe-3 and may be mixed with several times its volume of air in a mixing valve 36 which may be of any Suitable type for this purpose. Gas is fed to the compartment 3 through a pipe 40 and may be mixed with a suitable amount of air by means of a mixing valve 4. The compartments 2 and 3 are separated by means of a suitable flour seal 42 which main tains at all times a suitable depth of flour at this point So that gas from one compartment will not readily pass to the other. Likewise, a flour seal 43 is provided at the outlet end of the compart ment 3 to prevent gas therein from passing to the delivery chute 44 by means of which the bleached flour leaves the agitator.. It will be seen from the foregoing that flour to be bleached passes down through the chute into compartment 2 where it is violently agitated and mixed with the first bleaching gas and is propelled toward the outlet end at the right by means of the propeller blades 2. As the flour Which has thus passed its first bleaching opera tion passes the flour seal 42 it is picked up by the propeller blades 27 on the shaft ( and moved to... the left. At the same time, the paddles 26 cause it to be violently agitated so as to bring it inti 0 mately into contact with the second bleaching gas in the compartment 3. As it passes from right to left, it then receives its second bleach ing operation and is delivered to the flour seal 43 where it passes down the delivery chute 44 hav ing passed its second bleaching operation. If additional bleaching operations are desired, one or more additional bleaching chambers may be added in vertical alignment with flour seals be tween adjacent chambers in the manner dis closed.

2 According to present commercial bleaching processes, flours are bleached and aged in Sepa rate stages of treatment. For example, the ini tial treatment is accomplished with gaseous ni trogen trichloride which matures the flour. Ni trogen trichloride, in addition to being a matur ing agent, also possesses bleaching properties, but when used in sufficient amount to obtain a complete commercial color removal, injuries the quality of the flour. Therefore, for this reason, O nitrogen trichloride is used in an amount not substantially in excess of that required to ma ture or age the flour, and the necessary additional bleaching is accomplished by a subsequent treat ment with benzoyl peroxide, which has no ma turing properties. The process outlined above is time-consuming since benzoyl peroxide is a Solid which requires approximately 10 to hours to completely react with the flour and benzoyl per Oxide is rather expensive.. Our invention is based upon the discovery that the above-mentioned difficulties may be obviated by bleaching and maturing flour by a process which comprises exposing the flour or other edible finely divided milled products, while agitated in 2 a finely divided state, to the action of a gaseous bleaching agent for a sufficient length of time and at a sufficient partial pressure of the gas to at least partially bleach the flour or other finely divided product and then exposing the flour or other finely divided product, while agitated in a finely divided state, to the action of a second gaseous bleaching agent of a similar or different nature than that used in the first bleaching Oper ation, for a sufficient length of time and at a suf ficient partial pressure of the gas to complete the bleaching and maturing of the flour or other edible finely divided product. As an alternative to the process set forth above, we may mix or blend a stream of flour which has been so treated with another stream of flour which has also been similarly treated with other gaseous reagents thereby producing a four having the desired color, keeping qualities, and baking properties. The term 'multiple' bleaching as used in the Specification and claims refers to a method of applying gaseous bleaching agents. In multiple bleaching, flour is treated with multiple doses of bleaching reagent. Two variations occur when the repeated doses consist on the one hand of the same bleaching reagent and on the other hand of different reagents. We have found that both variations give improved results. The use of so-called bleaching agents on flour has two basic objectives: (1) To improve the color of the flour; and (2) To improve the baking properties of the flour. The best result would be a combination of the two. - : In making the above statement, it is under 2,824,3 stood that the problem of bleaching varies from one flour to another and that in many cases the desired objective would be to improve the color 6 of the flour without injuring its baking proper ties. These objectives have been sought for a number of years in all branches of the milling in dustry. Various bleaching reagents have been brought out from time to time and have been 70 adopted or discarded depending upon their merits and the cost thereof. The general objective of the present invention was to obtain the above improvements in greater degree and at lower COSts.....7 40 The present bleaching procedures generally used in industry are based almost entirely upon trial and error experiment. This is partly caused by the fact that the mechanism of bleaching and treating flour by so-called bleaching agents is not fully understood. It is further caused by the fact that experiments necessary for any thorough investigation are comparatively expensive. Any such study is complicated by the differences that exist between various types of wheat during the same season and between the same types of wheat from different crops. In commercial use today there are three types of bleaching reagents: gaseous, liquid and solid. The solid reagents are represented mainly by benzoyl peroxide. The most important gaseous reagents at present are nitrogen peroxide, NO2, N2O4 nitrogen trichloride, NCl3 and chlorine. Warious other reagents which have been used Oc casionally Or have been suggested are, for ex ample, as follows: nitrosyl chloride and hydrogen peroxide as well as various liquid fatty acid per oxides. Gaseous reagents react practically in stantaneously with the flour, whereas he solid reagents act slowly and may require as much as i0 to hours to cause substantially all the color removal of which they are capable after com plete blending has taken place. The present in vention is concerned solely with the fast-acting reagents, that is, with the gaseous classification. As heretofore stated, partial or total elimina tion of benzoyl peroxide is a desired objective be cause the cost of that material is very high, that is, at present about one dollar per pound for a commercial product containing about 16% of the active agent, benzoyl peroxide, or from one cent to three cents per barrel of finished flour, when used in combination with gaseous reagents. According to the prior art, the desired amount of reagents was determined on a small scale. This quantity was then added to the flour in a suitable single compartment agitator. The gas usually consisted of a single component, for in stance, chlorine. According to the present process, the gases used in bleaching are applied only in compara tively small quantities and have been diluted with air to low partial pressures, say in the order of 0. to 3 mm. of mercury. For convenience in reference, the bleaching agents herein mentioned are listed showing both the chemical name and formula. All but #6 are gaseoul.s. Reagents considered Chemical name Formula w How produced 1 Nitrogen peroxide.-- NO2, NO---. Generated by passage of air over electric, 82. 2 Chlorine dioxide---- CO-------- -- May be produced ac - cording to the process set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 2,172,434, dated Sept. 12, 1939, to George L. Cunning ham... 3 Nitrogen trichloride. NCs.--------- Reagtion of chlorine with a soluble alm monium salt. 4 Chlorine------------ Cla------------ Elstrolysis of salt solu O). t Hypochlorous acid. HOCl.-------- JTreating chlorine water with limestone. 6 Benzoyl peroxide.-- (CEICO)2O2. Reaction between ben zoyl chloride and a suitable peroxide. Reagents numbered 1, 3, 4 and 6 are now in widespread commercial use.

The ultimate results of bleaching processes must be interpreted in the light of both the color of the four and the quality of the finished product. Both factors are important although the latter may be considered the ultimate test. Nevertheless, color removal may be taken as a definite index of the bleach ing efficiency of the new processes for bleach ing which are described herein. This is true because a numerical value can be given to the flour color by measuring the carotenoid pigment content by suitable means. Flour color is conveniently expressed as parts of caroteine per million parts of flour. Therefore, a high carotene value means a large amount of yellow Color in the flour, while a low carotene value means a greater part of the color has been removed. Flour bleached according to our process has very superior white color which indicates a carotene content of approximately 0.4 to 1.1 parts per million parts of flour, depending on the initial carotene content of the flour. This carotene content is determined by the naphtha alcohol procedure. Multiple treatment of flour with the same bleach ing gas Applicants' research in the field of flour bleaching led them to believe that there was in efficient utilization of a gaseous bleaching reagent when it was added to the flour, and a Series of experiments were made to demonstrate this fact and to indicate a more efficient procedure. For example, laboratory tests according to the prior art might indicate on a given flour that four grams of nitrogen trichloride per barrel of flour were needed to obtain a suitable bleach. It is customary to express dosages of bleaching re agents in terms of grams or ounces per barrel of flour. As mentioned above, the gas is applied to the flour at a low partial pressure by mixing with air and blowing the mixture into the agi tator. This treatment would give a certain measurable amount of bleaching action. How ever, we have found that if repeated doses of smaller quantities of the gaseous bleaching re agent were used, a smaller total quantity of bleaching agent is required for the same total bleaching action. For instance, in Some cases three successive treatments of flour with one gram each of nitrogen trichloride per barrel of flour accomplished the same result that a single dose of four grams of nitrogen tichloride per barrel of flour would give in terms of color removal. At other times, two successive doses of approx imately 1. grams each would give the same result. This is of considerable importance be cause the cost of total reagent used is materially decreased, but it may be even more important because of the possibility of achieving a very interesting and valuable additional result. It is possible to overtreat a flour with a bleaching re agent, both from the standpoint of color, baking properties, and keeping qualities. With the usual methods of applying bleaching agents, adequate color removal may be accomplished but with cer tain types of flours this result cannot be accom plished without sacrificing desirable baking prop erties and keeping qualities. Therefore, the ap plication of repeated small dosages, which achieve adequate color removal with a lower total dosage of bleaching reagent and which may not have a deleterious effect on the baking prop erties may be a decidedly advantageous way of applying the bleaching reagent. 0. 2 3 40 70 7 Multiple bleaching Dith dissimilar gases This phase of applicants' invention will be prefaced by the following example of the pro cedure used. Baker's patent flour is fed into an agitator (as shown in the drawing) at the rate of twenty barrels per hour. In the conventional equip ment, the flour enters at one end of the agitator and is gradually moved to the other end as a result of the action of a series of agitating blades which keep the flour in constant motion and keep a part of it in Suspension in the free space above the body of the four. This flour after the bleach ing treatment exits at the opposite end of the agitator. Nitrogen trichloride (in this example, a total of two grams per barrel), is introduced into the agitator at low, partial pressure at the same end at which the flour enters. This partial pressure is adjusted to the optimum level for the efficient utilization of the chemical bleach ing agent by varying the speed of... the flour through the agitator or by varying the amount of air which is introduced into the agitator. In our experiments, the reaction between the gase ous bleaching agent and the flour in the first bleaching compartment is complete but the flour, from the first compartment, has not been bleached to the desired level, as this completion of the bleaching and maturing of the four oc curs in the second bleaching compartment of. the agitator after the exposure of the flour, in a finely divided condition, to the action of the Second bleaching gas. On leaving the first agi tator the flour passes to the second bleaching compartment of the agitator through which it again travels in the manner described above. However, nitrogen peroxide is added to the sec ond bleaching compartment of the agitator at the rate of approximately 1% grams per barrel. In this operation, the gases are metered by com mercially available equipment and the individual operations are carried out according to normal bleaching procedure. The partial pressure of the nitrogen trichloride in this example, however, was about one milli meter of mercury and the partial pressure of nitrogen peroxide was approximately 2 mm. of Hg. n A similar bleaching run was made applying the same quantities of gas in the reverse order. The results of this series of experiments which are illustrative of our process are given in the following table: Bleaching action of different methods of applica tion of gas Bleaching treatment per barrel of flour 3 Carotene P. p. m. Unbleached--------------------------------------------- 3.18 2 grams of NCl3---------------------------------.6 1. grams NO followed by 2 grams of NCls------ - - - 1.6 2 grains NCl3 followed by 1. grams NO---------------- 1.07 Comparison of the last two results illustrated above, shows that the order of application is im portant. The Order listed in the last example, that is, nitrogen trichloride followed by nitrogen peroxide, is the preferred method for bleaching action, from the color removal standpoint. Some reagents are more efficient in removing color (carotenoid pigments principally) than others. Nitrogen peroxide in this respect is re garded as a weak reagent and is not used ac-. cording to present bleaching practice as the sole

4 color removing agent, because adequate color re moval is not achieved. Color removal experi ments have demonstrated that not all color is removed with equal facility. Thus the initial bleaching action seems to take place most read ily. After each increment of color removal, the residual color has been more difficult to remove with the same reagent. In other words, it re quires relatively more reagent to achieve the last fraction of color removal than the first. On this basis, when two reagents like nitrogen trichloride and nitrogen peroxide are applied, the former being a much stronger color renoving agent than the latter, it would seem that the weaker reagent nitrogen peroxide should be used first to remove the more easily bleached portion of color. In our experiments, the surprising result was that this was not true, and we have demon strated that the reverse order is preferable, namely, nitrogen trichloride followed by nitrogen peroxide. Similar experiments made with combinations of the common gases already listed show that in most cases there is a preferential Order of ap plication for the attainment of optimum bleach ing action. The order of preference for the gases tested depending upon the desired result to be attained is shown in the following table, but since the mechanism of bleaching is not fully known, and since only a few reagents are avail able, no general pattern can be given but in stead a preferred order for each pair of re agents has been indicated: Preferential order of application and bleaching action First gas: Second gas: NCl3 --four-> NO2--same flour Cl2 --four->ncl3--same flour Cl2 +flour->clo2+same flour ClO2 --four->ncl3--same flour HOC1--flour->CIO2--same flour The above table indicates the preferred order of application for maximum color removal and is frequently the order for optimum maturing action. However, the reverse of the order indi cated above is sometimes preferable when Op timum baking properties alone are considered. For example, with some flours it has been found that nitrogen peroxide followed by nitrogen tri chloride resulted in optimum baking properties, but not maximum color removal. Our researches did not indicate that there is any preference in order for hypochlorous acid versus chlorine or for hypoghlorous acid versus. nitrogen trichloride. As applied to the bleaching reagents listed in this table, it is possible to place them in such an order that the best results are obtained when any one of the gases listed is followed by any one of the reagents listed below it. Such an order with the exceptions noted above is as follows: Cia-------------- --- - - ---- Chlorine HOCl.--------------------- Hypochlorous acid ClO2---------------------- Chlorine dioxide NCl3---------------------- Nitrogen trichloride NO2---------------------- Nitrogen peroxide The value of applicants' processes of multiple bleaching has been stated to a certain extent, but there are other valuable results which also appear. Normally, one gaseous reagent was used as far as it was considered safe without injuring baking properties and then "Novadel' (benzoyl. peroxide) was added to the four to give the rest 0 2 40 2 grams nitrogen trichloride/bbl and 1. P. p.m. Velume-ce. grams NO added simultaneously----. 0.98 2,72 2 grams nitrogen trichloride/bbl. followed by 1. grams NO2------------------------ 0.78 2,8 Unbleached flour.------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2. 2,82 0 6 70 7 of the bleach. The amount of benzoyl peroxide used was held to a minimum because of its high cost. If nitrogen trichloride is used in too great a quantity, the flour is injured, and One or more of the baking characteristics of the flour are not satisfactory. Therefore, the amount that can be used is limited and the cost for benzoyl peroxide increases. Nitrogen peroxide is very inexpensive because it is easily generated by the electric arc. However, when it is added alone in amounts large enough to produce adequate color removal, there is a definite tendency for the flour to become rancid. For these reasons nitrogen peroxide is used commercially for only a part of the color re moval and is followed usually by benzoyl peroxide to complete the desired color removal. It has been found experimentally that little or nothing is gained by mixing nitrogen trichloride and nitrogen peroxide simultaneously in the same agitator. Thus, for example, two grams of nitro gen trichloride applied to a flour gave a result ant caroteine value of 1.22 P. P. M. When two grams of nitrogen trichloride and 0.7 gram nitro gen peroxide were added simultaneously to the flour the carotene value was likewise 1.22 P. P. M. Thus, the addition of nitrogen peroxide was of no value and did not lead to more color removal. It was discovered by experiment that Some un expected and valuable results are obtained by selecting a preferred order of treatment, namely, when nitrogen trichloride treatment is followed by nitrogen peroxide treatment. A greater color removal is achieved and improved baking proper ties result, as will be seen by the following ex ample: Carotene Loaf Further, it has been found that considerable advantage accrues when a gaseous bleaching agent is added in small increments instead of as a single dosage. When the sum of the incre ments equal the quantity of reagent used in a single treatment substantially more color re moval is accomplished by the former than the latter, and this may be the desired result. On the other hand, less and sometimes considerably less bleaching reagent may be added in Small in crements with the same bleaching effect the larger single treatment had, a result that is frequently advantageous. The advantage resides in the cir cumstance that bleaching sometimes injures the baking properties of the flour and hence the smaller the dosage of reagent required for ade quate color removal the better, in fact, adequate color removal may be achieved without causing substantial damage to baking properties. In gen eral, these results will be to bleach flour more cheaply and in many cases to improve baking qualities with benefit to the miller, the baker and the ultimate consumer. Multiple bleaching followed by blending In addition to the procedure outlined above, a stream of four may be bleached by the succes sive action of two similar gases or by the succes sive action of two dissimilar gases and then this flour stream may be blended with another por tion of flour which has been treated by the suc

cessive action of two bleaching agents to obtain desirable results. This makes it possible to ob tain optimum balance between bleaching action and change in the baking properties. It is ob vious that certain combinations of flour may be better for general use than either one of the flours alone, but in order to get an effect that is of Con mercial value, it is necessary to increase the bene fits by considerable amounts. The results of such a test are given in the following table which shows the scoring of bread baked from flour pre pared by various treatments of the same lot of patent flour: Crumb Crumb volume floaf 9argete content of four color grain of feated O flour Treatment per barre Contro test-2 10------- 10 2,800 0.80 grains of nitrogen... trichloride--0.032 f e benzoyl peroxe 2 1.7 oz. chlorine, fol- 10, dull 10 2,670 0.87 lowed by gns.no white. 33 grams nitrogen tri- 10, du O 2,6 0.78 chloride, followed creamy.... -- by 1. grans NO. 2 2,79 0.83 4 Blend 0%, #2, 0% #3. 11...--- 10+ 10 tion is not limited thereto but may also be ap - plied to various other streams of milled prod lucts such, for example, as rye.. By the term "bleaching' as used in the ap pended claims, it is intended to mean what the term means in commercial milling, namely color removal with or without accompanying improve ment in the baking properties. While the invention has been described in de tail with specific examples, such examples are illustrative and are not given as limitations, since other modifications within the spirit and SCOpe of the invention will be apparent to those Skilled in the art. We claim as our invention: 1. A process of bleaching flour products and other finely divided milled cereal products which comprises contacting said product, while agi tated in a finely divided state, with a gaseous bleaching agent for a time sufficient to bleach said product partially, and then contacting the thus partly bleached product, while agitated in a finely divided state, with a further quantity of. said gaseous bleaching agent for a time suff cient to bleach said product further. 2. A process of bleaching flour products and other finely divided milled cereal products which From the above table it will be noted that the gomprises contacting said product, while agi volume of the bread baked with the blend of #2 tated in a finely divided state, with a gaseous and #3 is just as good as that of bread baked with bleaching agent included in the following list: the control flour in spite of the fact that bread baked with either of the component parts of the Chlorine blend showed a very marked decrease in the size Hypochlorous acid of the loaf. In addition, the combination of Chlorine dioxide these two flours yields a final loaf which has a 3 Nitrogen trichloride measurably improved crumb color and grain. for a time sufficient to bleach said product par Such results could not have been predicted but tially, and then contacting the thus partly evidently must be attributed to a complementary treated product, While agitated in a finely di action of the treatments on the flour. It will be vided state, with a gaseous bleaching agent in noted that the crumb color is graded in units. 40 cluded in the above list but appearing lower in The crumb color of a selected standard loaf is the list than said first-mentioned gaseous agent, taken as 10. The higher number indicates a bet to bleach said product further. ter color; the rating of 11 is measurably better 3. A process of bleaching flour products and than 10. When applied to some other flours of other finely divided milled cereal products which varying grade, the results. Sometimes are even 4 comprises contacting said product, while agi greater. In this example, the treatment con tated in a finely divided state, with chlorine for sisted of dividing a given flour into two parts, a time sufficient to bleach said product partially, treating each part with two different gases in and then contacting the thus partly treated prod succession and then combining the parts after treatment. Another method of utilizing this same 0 uct with nitrogen trichloride to bleach said prod uct further, principle is to treat two or more separate flours 4. A process of bleaching flour products and with a suitable succession of bleaching agents other finely divided milled cereal products which and then blend the treated flour; or to treat var comprises contacting said product, while agi ious groups of flour streams from the same wheat tated in a finely divided state, with a gaseous mix with the same or different types of treat bleaching agent for a time sufficient to bleach ments and then to combine these streams to form. said product partially, thereafter contacting the the finished products. thus partly bleached product, while agitated in a The particular treatment chosen for a for finely divided state, with a gaseous bleaching depends not only on the type of wheat used but agent for a time sufficient to bleach said product also upon the use to which the flour is to be put. For example, three simple classifications of flour further, and blending said product with another finely divided milled cereal product treated in the are as follows: (1) Bread flour; (2) Cake flour; (3) All-purpose or family flour, same manner by a different combination of gase ous agents. While the present invention has been described CHARLES G. FERRARI, with particular reference to the treatment of WILLIS S. HUTCENSON. wheat flour, it will be apparent that the inven