Case 1:18-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:07-cv MLC-JJH Document 1 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 12 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 22

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK DILUTION, FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, AND UNFAIR COMPETITION

2:08-cv PMD-GCK Date Filed 02/05/2008 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:07-cv FDW-DCK Document 1 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2018 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv PAE Document 1 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cv AJT-RSW Document 1 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 17

Notice of Opposition

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/18/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

Case 0:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:17-cv YY Document 35 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 36

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Case 0:18-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2018 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/06/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv RLV Document 14 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 53

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

[Second Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 8, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/27/18 Page 1 of 28 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv SLR Document 56 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID #: 1839 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 08/07/15 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 729

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MARCH 10, 2014

FASHION LAW. Kirby B. Drake, Partner Tiffany Johnson, Associate August 17, Klemchuk LLP

DECISION. The grounds for the opposition are as follows:

CHAPTER 114: TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING SERVICES

Case 1:15-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

H 7915 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

A Bill Regular Session, 2007 SENATE BILL 276

OSBORNE Y COMPANIA S.A., Opposer, INTER PARTES CASE NO. 1891

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2001 H 1 HOUSE BILL 635. March 15, 2001

14.22 TATTOO AND BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS.

Body Art Technician License Application

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/13 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The 17 th Western China International Fair 2018

Body Art Temporary Technician License

REGULATING COMMUNITY STANDARDS ORDINANCE

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

IC Chapter 19. Precious Metal Dealers

As Engrossed: S2/1/01. By: Representatives Bledsoe, Borhauer, Bond, Rodgers, Green. For An Act To Be Entitled

x x

2017 American Indian Arts Marketplace at the Autry November 11 & 12, 2017

TESTIMONY OF STEVE MAIMAN CO-OWNER, STONY APPAREL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA IN OPPOSITION TO H.R U.S

Case 2:08-cv PMP-GWF Document 1 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 27

FAVORITE DESIGNER: FAVORITE STYLIST: Applicant Initial FWLV

Body Art Establishment

Case5:10-cv LHK Document62 Filed10/05/10 Page1 of 10

CONSOLIDATION UPDATE: DECEMBER 11, 2002

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR TATTOO AND/OR BODY PIERCING BUSINESS LICENSE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

DfT Terms & Conditions

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 47 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 40

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/21/2014 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 266 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2014. Exhibit 4

House Bill 2587 Sponsored by Representative BARNHART (Presession filed.)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

SAFEGUARDING YOUR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 382. Short Title: Mobile Beauty Salons. (Public)

Case3:13-cv EDL Document1 Filed10/11/13 Page1 of 40

POLICIES & PROCEDURES MANUAL Love Shibue Inc.

Trademark Law. Prof. Madison University of Pittsburgh School of Law

x x

ASSEMBLY BILL NO Pursuant to Article V, Section I, Paragraph 14 of the New. Jersey Constitution, I am returning Assembly Bill No.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR TATTOO AND/OR BODY PIERCING APPLICANT LICENSE

CHAPTER 126 (CORRECTED COPY)

Town of Dover Special Meeting of the Board of Health April 30, :30 pm

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

Senate Bill No. 193 Senator Hardy. Joint Sponsors: Assemblymen Hardy and Stewart

TATTOO & BODY PIERCING INSURANCE APPLICATION

Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 246 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor

Assembly Amendment to Senate Bill No. 193 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor

House Bill 3409 Ordered by the Senate May 21 Including House Amendments dated April 17 and Senate Amendments dated May 21 to resolve conflicts

The 61 st Bangkok Gems & Jewelry Fair. The 62 nd Bangkok Gems & Jewelry Fair February 2018, hrs. 25 February 2018, hrs.

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3409

RULES GOVERNING BODY PIERCING TATTOO ESTABLISHMENTS

Fashion and U.S. IP Law

PLEASE NOTE: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION ON PAGE 2 MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Name Business is Conducted Under (DBA):

Logo Usage Licence Agreement For the use of the Responsible Wood and PEFC Trademarks

Chapter 67. BODY ART ESTABLISHMENTS (TATTOOING) Established (09-56)

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

RESEARCH PERMIT SIGN-OFF SHEET. The attached research application has been reviewed by the individuals below with recommendations as follows:

CITY OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NO

Art in the Plaza Guidelines

2011 No. 327 ANIMALS. The Pigs (Records, Identification and Movement) (Scotland) Order 2011

Protection. Hot Issues in IP. Presented by: Steve Wadyka. September 11, 2018 Stockholm, Sweden

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STORM DRAIN STENCILING PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., Plaintiff, C.A. No. [CCLD]

Transcription:

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO CHANEL, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRIP WEST, LLC doing business as COLORADO PARTY RENTAL and COLORADO PARTY RENTALS, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Chanel, Inc. ( Chanel or Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned attorneys, alleges on knowledge as to its own acts and otherwise on information and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for trademark infringement, false designation of origin and false advertising, trademark dilution and unfair competition, and deceptive acts and practices in violation of the laws of the United States and the State of Colorado. Chanel seeks an injunction, damages, and related relief. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1121 and 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338, and 1367. Plaintiff s claims are predicated upon the Lanham Trademark

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 14 Act of 1946, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., and related claims under the statutory and common law of the State of Colorado. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the statelaw claims under 28 U.S.C. 1367 in that those claims are related to claims under this Court s original jurisdiction and form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 (b) and (c) in that Defendant does and/or transacts business, or may otherwise be found, in this judicial district, and the acts complained of have occurred and are occurring in this judicial district. THE PARTIES 3. Chanel is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 9 W 57 th St., New York, NY 10019. 4. Defendant Trip West, LLC, doing business as Colorado Party Rental and Colorado Party Rentals ( CPR ), is a Colorado limited liability company with a principal place of business located at 5005 Ironton Street, Denver, Colorado 80239 and 890 Elkton Drive, Suite 101, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907. CPR advertised, distributed, offered for rent, and rented the infringing products at issue in this case and otherwise regularly conducts business in Colorado and within this judicial district. CHANEL S FAMOUS TRADEMARKS 5. For over eight decades, Chanel has advertised, offered for sale, and sold fragrance and beauty products, high quality leather goods, apparel, costume jewelry, accessories, and a wide variety of other products including home goods throughout the United States. Chanel s fragrance and beauty products, leather goods, apparel, costume jewelry, accessories, and other 2

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 14 products have been widely advertised, offered for sale, and sold throughout the United States under various distinctive trademarks, including but not limited to the CC Monogram: The CC Monogram trademarks have at all relevant times been owned by Chanel or its predecessor. 6. The CC Monogram trademarks are represented on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of consumer goods sold each year. Products bearing or sold under the CC Monogram trademarks are available at Chanel boutiques, select department stores, and specialty retail locations throughout the United States. In this judicial district; Chanel products bearing or sold under the CC Monogram trademarks are available at brick and mortar stores, on Chanel s own website, and by authorized retailers on the Internet. In addition to appearing on products, the CC Monogram trademarks are also used on packaging and collateral materials including but not limited to hangtags, hangers, boxes, bottles, compacts, and labels. 7. The public s recognition of the CC Monogram trademarks is enhanced by Chanel s extensive advertising, and by editorial and press coverage of Chanel s product line. Advertisements featuring the CC Monogram trademarks appear in nationally distributed publications that reach hundreds of millions of people. Press coverage of Chanel s products bearing the CC Monogram trademarks also reaches hundreds of millions of consumers. 8. As a result of its exclusive and extensive use, advertisement, and promotion, the CC Monogram trademarks have acquired enormous value and recognition in the United States. The CC Monogram trademarks are well known to the consuming public and trade as identifying 3

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 14 and distinguishing Chanel exclusively and uniquely as the source of origin of the high quality products to which the mark is applied. The CC Monogram trademarks are both inherently distinctive and famous. 9. The CC Monogram trademarks are registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with fragrance and beauty products, leather goods, apparel, costume jewelry, accessories, and other products, including but not limited to the following registrations (hereinafter collectively the CC Monogram Trademarks ): MARK REGISTRATION NO. 195,359 399,751 799,642 1,241,264 1,271,876 1,347,094 1,654,350 4,505,440 4,237,494 4,973,295 1,293,398 1,314,511 1,654,252 1,734,822 4,074,269 5,280,486 DATE OF ISSUANCE 2/24/1925 1/26/1943 11/30/1965 6/7/1983 3/27/1984 7/9/1985 8/20/1991 4/1/2014 11/6/2012 6/7/2016 9/4/1984 1/15/1985 8/20/1991 11/24/1992 12/20/2011 9/5/2017 1,501,898 8/30/1988 10. The foregoing registrations are valid and subsisting and are in full force and effect and some have achieved incontestable status pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1065. 4

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 14 DEFENDANT S WRONGFUL ACTIVITIES 11. Defendant, without the consent of Chanel, has advertised, distributed, offered for rent, and/or rented in interstate commerce wood Chanel and/or Infinity dining chairs bearing infringements of the CC Monogram Trademarks (the Offending Chairs ). Examples of Defendant s rental offerings have been annexed hereto as Exhibit A. 12. Long after Plaintiff s adoption, use, and authorization of use of the CC Monogram Trademarks on fragrance and beauty products, leather goods, apparel, costume jewelry, accessories, and a wide variety of other products including home goods, and long after Plaintiff s federal registration of its trademarks, Defendant commenced the advertisement, distribution, offer for rent, and rental of the Offending Chairs bearing infringements of the CC Monogram Trademarks, as this trademark appears on products authorized by Plaintiff and as detailed in this Complaint. 13. The acts of Defendant in advertising, distributing, offering for rent, and renting in interstate commerce of the Offending Chairs bearing infringements of the CC Monogram Trademarks: (a) are likely to cause confusion and mistake among the consuming public that there is some affiliation, connection, or association of Defendant with Chanel, (b) are likely to cause confusion and mistake among the consuming public that said products are being offered to the consuming public with the sponsorship or approval of Chanel, and/or (c) have caused and are likely to cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the CC Monogram Trademarks. 14. Defendant advertised, distributed, offered for rent, and rented the Offending Chairs knowing the chairs bore infringements of the CC Monogram Trademarks. Defendant engaged in a deliberate effort to cause confusion and mistake among the consuming public as to 5

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 14 the source, affiliation, and/or sponsorship of said products and to gain to Defendant the benefit of the enormous goodwill associated with the CC Monogram Trademarks. The aforementioned acts of Defendant are also likely to dilute, and have diluted, the distinctive quality of the CC Monogram Trademarks. 15. On May 17, 2018, Chanel placed Defendant on notice via cease and desist letter regarding its offer for rent and rental of the Offending Chairs, but Defendant has refused to discontinue the rentals of the Offending Chairs. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. 1114 16. Chanel repeats each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 15 above as if fully set forth herein. 17. Defendant s use of the CC Monogram Trademarks without Chanel s consent constitutes trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114, in that, among other things, such use is likely to cause confusion, deception, and mistake among the consuming public and trade as to the source, approval, or sponsorship of the goods bearing infringements of the CC Monogram Trademarks. 18. Such conduct on the part of Defendant has injured Chanel in an amount to be determined at trial and has caused and threatens to cause irreparable injury to Chanel for which Chanel has no adequate remedy at law. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, FALSE ADVERTISING, AND UNFAIR COMPETITION PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C 1125(a) 19. Chanel repeats each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 18 above as if fully set forth herein. 6

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 14 20. Defendant s use of the CC Monogram Trademarks without Chanel s consent constitutes the use of false or misleading designations of origin and/or the making of false or misleading representations of fact and/or false advertising in commercial advertising or promotion in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) in that, among other things, such use is likely to cause confusion, deception, and mistake among the consuming public and trade as to the source, approval, or sponsorship of the goods manufactured, advertised, distributed, offered for rent, and/or rented by Defendant bearing infringements of the CC Monogram Trademarks. 21. Such conduct on the part of Defendant has injured Chanel in an amount to be determined at trial and has caused and threatens to cause irreparable injury to Chanel, for which Chanel has no adequate remedy at law. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF FEDERAL TRADEMARK DILUTION PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. 1125(c) 22. Chanel repeats each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 21 above as if fully set forth herein. 23. The CC Monogram Trademarks are famous and inherently distinctive. Chanel and its affiliates, in connection with the promotion and sale of their products, have used the CC Monogram Trademarks for decades on both a national and international basis. As a result of Chanel s extensive and substantial promotion of the CC Monogram Trademarks, the consuming public and trade have come to associate the CC Monogram Trademarks uniquely and distinctly with Chanel and its high quality merchandise. 24. Long after the CC Monogram Trademarks became famous, Defendant, without authority from Chanel, used unauthorized reproductions, copies, and colorable imitations of the 7

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 14 CC Monogram Trademarks and thereby caused, and is causing, the actual dilution of the distinctive qualities of these registered trademarks. 1125(c). 25. As a result, Defendant has engaged in trademark dilution in violation of 15 U.S.C. 26. Such conduct on the part of Defendant has injured Chanel in an amount to be determined at trial and has caused and threatens to cause irreparable injury to Chanel, for which Chanel has no adequate remedy at law. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF COMMON LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 27. Chanel repeats each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 26 above as if fully set forth herein. 28. The aforementioned acts of Defendant constitute trademark infringement in violation of the common law of the State of Colorado. 29. Defendant s conduct has injured Chanel in an amount to be determined at trial and has caused and will continue to cause irreparable injury to Chanel for which Chanel has no adequate remedy at law. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION 30. Chanel repeats each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 29 above as if fully set forth herein. 31. Defendant has willfully and intentionally used the CC Monogram Trademarks without authorization or consent from Chanel in commerce in connection with the advertisement, 8

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 14 distribution, offer for rent, and/or rental of the Offending Chairs in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the true source or sponsorship of Defendant s goods. 32. Defendant s conduct has enabled Defendant to earn profits to which Defendant is not in law, equity, or good conscience entitled, and has unjustly enriched Defendant, all to Defendant s profit and to Chanel s damage and detriment. 33. Defendant s wrongful activity consisting of unauthorized use of the CC Monogram Trademarks is calculated to deceive consumers and is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception as to the association and affiliation of Defendant s products with Chanel and Chanel s products. 34. The aforementioned acts of Defendant constitute unfair competition in violation of the common law of the State of Colorado. 35. Defendant s misconduct has injured Chanel in an amount to be determined at trial and has caused and will continue to cause irreparable injury to Chanel for which Chanel has no adequate remedy at law. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (COLORADO CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT) 36. Chanel repeats each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 35 above as if fully set forth herein. 37. Defendant s conduct constitutes unfair competition and unfair or deceptive trade practices in violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-101 et seq. For example, section 6-1-105 contains several provisions that go directly to Defendant s improper use of Chanel s marks. These include, but are not limited to subsections (a) ( Knowingly passes off goods, services, or property as those of another ); (b) ( Knowingly makes a false 9

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 14 representation as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods, services, or property ); (c) ( Knowingly makes a false representation as to affiliation, connection, or association with or certification by another ) and (d) ( Uses deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in connection with goods or services ). 38. On information and belief, Defendant s wrongful and deceptive activities have had, and continue to have a significant impact upon the public as actual or potential consumers. 39. On information and belief, Defendant s wrongful and deceptive activities have caused, and, unless enjoined by the Court, will continue to cause irreparable injury and other damage to Chanel s business, reputation, and goodwill for which Chanel has no adequate remedy at law. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Chanel demands judgment as follows: 1. Ordering Defendant to preserve and produce all documents and things regarding, referring to, or reflecting the design, manufacture, importation, exportation, distribution, promotion, advertisement, offer for rent, rental, and/or sale of any products bearing the CC Monogram Trademarks, including but not limited to any written, typed, photocopied, photographed, recorded, computer generated or stored, or other communication or representation, either stored manually or digitally in any computer memory, hard drive, server, or other form retrievable by a computer which are currently in Defendant s custody, possession, or control. 10

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 14 2. Preliminarily and Permanently enjoining and restraining Defendant, its respective subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, officers, directors, principals, servants, employees, successors, and assigns, and all those in active concert or participation with them from: (a) imitating, copying, or making unauthorized use of the CC Monogram Trademarks or any marks confusingly similar thereto; (b) manufacturing, importing, exporting, distributing, circulating, offering for rent, renting, offering for sale, selling, advertising, promoting, or displaying any products bearing any unauthorized reproduction, copy, or colorable imitation of the CC Monogram Trademarks or any marks confusingly similar thereto; (c) using any unauthorized colorable imitation of the CC Monogram Trademarks, or any marks confusingly similar thereto, in connection with the manufacture, promotion, advertisement, display, offering for rental, rental, offering for sale, sale, production, import, export, circulation, or distribution of any product in such manner as to relate or connect, or tend to relate or connect, such product in any way with Chanel or to any goods sold, sponsored, approved by, or connected with Chanel; (d) using any unauthorized colorable imitation of the CC Monogram Trademarks, or any marks confusingly similar thereto, in connection with the manufacture, promotion, advertisement, display, offer for rental, rental, offer for sale, sale, production, import, export, circulation, or distribution of any product which dilutes or is likely to dilute Chanel s image, trade names, or reputation, or the distinctive quality of the CC Monogram Trademarks; (e) engaging in any other activity constituting unfair competition with Chanel or constituting an infringement of the CC Monogram Trademarks or of Chanel s rights in or its 11

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 14 right to use or exploit such trademarks, or constituting dilution of the CC Monogram Trademarks and the reputation and the goodwill associated therewith; (f) making any statement or representation whatsoever with respect to the infringing goods at issue that falsely designates the origin of the products as those of Chanel, or that is false or misleading with respect to Chanel; and (g) engaging in any other activity, including the effectuation of assignments or transfers of its interests in unauthorized colorable imitations of the CC Monogram Trademarks or any marks confusingly similar thereto, or the formation of other corporations, partnerships, associations, or other entities or the utilization of any other devices, for the purpose of circumventing, evading, avoiding, or otherwise violating the prohibitions set forth in subsections 2(a) through 2(f) above. 3. Ordering that Defendant be adjudged to have violated 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a) by infringing the CC Monogram Trademarks. 4. Ordering that Defendant be adjudged to have violated 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). 5. Ordering that Defendant be adjudged to have violated 15 U.S.C. 1125(c) by diluting the CC Monogram Trademarks. 6. Ordering that Defendant be adjudged to have engaged in activities that are likely to dilute the distinctive quality of the CC Monogram Trademarks and/or injure Chanel s business reputation in violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-101 et seq. 7. Ordering that Defendant be adjudged to have infringed upon the CC Monogram Trademarks in violation of the common law of the State of Colorado. 12

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 14 8. Directing Defendant to deliver for destruction all Offending Chairs and components bearing the CC Monogram Trademarks, or anything confusingly similar thereto, remaining in Defendant s inventory and all products, labels, tags, artwork, prints, signs, packages, dies, plates, molds, matrices, and any other means of production, wrappers, receptacles, and advertisements relating to the Offending Chairs in its possession, custody, or control bearing resemblance to the CC Monogram Trademarks and/or any marks that are confusingly similar thereto. 9. Directing such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate to prevent the trade and public from deriving any erroneous impression that any product at issue in this case that has been offered for rent, rented, offered for sale, sold, and/or otherwise circulated or promoted by Defendant is authorized by Chanel and/or is related to or associated in any way with Chanel and/or Chanel s products. 10. Requiring Defendant to account and pay over to Chanel all profits realized by its wrongful acts and directing that such profits be enhanced as to Defendant s willful actions. 11. Awarding Chanel its costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys fees, investigatory fees, and destruction fees. 12. Retaining jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of enabling Plaintiff to apply to the Court at any time for such further orders and interpretation or execution of any order entered in this action for the modification of any such order, for the enforcement or compliance therewith, and for the punishment of any violations thereof. 13

Case 1:18-cv-02090-KMT Document 1 Filed 08/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 14 13. Awarding Chanel such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Dated: August 16, 2018 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP By: /s/ Charles W. Steese Charles W. Steese Douglas N. Marsh Armstrong Teasdale LLP 4643 South Ulster, Suite 800 Denver, Colorado 80237 Telephone: (720) 200-0676 Fax: (720) 200-0679 csteese@armstrongteasdale.com dmarsh@armstrongteasdale.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Chanel, Inc. Seeking Admission to Bar of the Court Martin J. Feinberg Safia Anand Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP 1325 Avenue of the Americas, 16th Floor New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 451-2300 Fax: (212) 451-2222 mfeinberg@olshanlaw.com sanand@olshanlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 14