The Effectiveness of Water, Sodium Hypochlorite Bleach, and Peroxyacetic Acid (PAA) in Eradicating Listeria monocytogenes

Similar documents
Surgical Hand Disinfection

Student Performance Guide. Student Performance Guide. Student Performance Guide

Technical Information. Clorox Healthcare Bleach Germicidal Cleaner OVERVIEW. Clorox Healthcare Bleach Germicidal

Standard Laboratory Practice for Consumer Applied Pet Stain and Odor Removal Chemical Evaluation on Pile Yarn Floor Coverings

organiq FAMILY INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS

Health Canada registered to kill C.difficile Spores in 5 minutes*

Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Palatka, FL

Jake Rocchi CCHS, 9 th grade 1 st year in PJAS. Bleach Effects on Microbial Life

NTC Project S02-CD01 (formerly I02-E01)

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Description: SAF BLEACH Revision Number: 01 Document Number: MSDS B015

CLEANING, SANITIZING, AND DISINFECTING

Infection Control Solutions Product Solutions. for Surfaces & Skin

PRESENTS WHMIS AND THE SAFE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Teat-Dips Past, Present and Future. Mark Puliafico

Laboratory Orientation. Biological Screening

BIO Lab 12: Bacteria. Materials Required:

PET Barrier Test PET- R- 02

Disinfectants in Personal Services Settings

BSL-2 Emergency Plan

Absorbents. Absorbents

We understand that a competitor has raised the following issues which we will address in this letter.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Effective Date: 04/08/2013

Evaluating the Use of Ultraviolet Light as a Method for Improving Hatching Egg Selection

DECON-HAND. Instant Hand Sanitizer. HAND_VL Revised 19 November, Technical Data File

Odor is the Leading Cause of Poor Restroom Experiences 72% of U.S. adults consider bad smell the No. 1 cause of awful restroom experience.

LAB 3 CHARACTERIZING YOUR UNKNOWN BACTERIA AND USING MORE COMPLEX STAINS. Part I: Isolating Your Unknown Bacteria and Describing Colony Morphology

Hygiene solutions for all Dairy Farmers

COLLECTION INSTRUCTIONS - SAMPLES (VARIOUS TYPES)

Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol for Emergency Services Fire, Ambulance, Police, Search & Rescue

The Effects of Shear on Neutralized Carbomers in Aqueous Conditions

Affordable Efficiency at Work

Safety Data Sheet SANDPIT SANITISER 1. Identification

UniTab. Disinfectant & Sanitizing Tablets A bleach alternative in tablet form DIN: Code: (120 x 6.55 g tablet)

2018 A&L Product Reference Guide

Product Information Gluconolactone and Sodium Benzoate (GSB)

What is infection control?

Updated by S. McNew, March Deborah Jung Microbiology Preparation Technician

Infection prevention. Infection prevention. FoamING sanitizer Liquid sanitizer Foaming soap Lotion soap Lotion. EB LI, (Rev.

Your Solution for Infection Control. The Standard Protocol in Infection Control

Mt. San Antonio College: Spring 2018 MICR 22 Lab Orientation. Welcome to the Microbiology 22 Laboratory!

Gafquat 440, 755N, 755N-P, 755N-O and HS-100, HS-100-O polymers Cationic conditioning copolymers

Advantages of PVC chemical resistance for pressure pipes

BSL2 Exposure Control Plan: Human or Non Human Primate Materials

ATYPICAL PRODUCT PRESERVATION

Product Safety Data Sheet

Safety Data Sheet. revised 01-Jul Detonator

Experiment 11 Identification of Food Colors in Candies

Exercise 6-D STAINING OF MICROORGANISMS ENDOSPORE STAINS, CAPSULE STAINS & FLAGELLA

TECHNICAL UPDATE DECEMBER 2012

Uniperol Bleach IT. Technical Information. Europe

The effectiveness of a solution containing sodium hypochlorite 0.5% in removing tea discoloration on heat-cured acrylic resin

Biohazardous Waste. 1. Solid Biohazardous Waste (non-sharps) Storage

Bacterial smear and Staining

Material Safety Data Sheet. Urine Rescue

Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation Health & Safety Sanitation Standards Topic Definitions

II. Moisturization Improves skin moisture content General Recognized as Safe (GRAS) ingredients by FDA (21 CFR 184) No animal testing, non GMO.

Brazing Fluxes Revision Date: 00/03/2000

Accident Prevention Signs & Tags

E-Blotter Operation. Technical Bulletin E-03 MATERIAL PROCEDURE

THE SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF MICROORGANISMS IN MASCARA DURING USE Louis A. WILSON, M.D., A. J. JULIAN, M.S., AND DONALD G. AHEARN, PH.D.

Material Safety Data Sheet

EcoHydra Antimicrobial Hand Lotion. Product Overview. Physical Properties. Product Description. Regulatory Compliance. Key Features and Benefits

Go2. Environmentally Sound Cleaning System. #3 #4 Easy as Put the cleaning power of mother nature to work for you! #1 #2

RUST REMOVER. Corrosive to metals - Category 1; Skin corrosion - Category 1B; Serious eye damage - Category 1

Scrubbing, gowning and gloving evidence for best practice part 1

Hand Hygiene & PPE Policy

NASG CLEANING & FOLDING

DECOLOR B SHIMMER. Questions & Answers

PREPARATION OF BLOOD FILMS FOR MALARIA DETECTION

DRS 379 RWANDA STANDARD. Aftershave Specification. First edition mm-dd. Reference number DRS 379: 2018

Standard Microbiological Practices: Basic Biosafety Principles & Lab Hygiene

Surgical Hand Scrub Updates. Surgical Hand Scrub Updates

Colin M c Steen Pittsburgh Central Catholic High School Grade 9

Product Safety Data Sheet

The Aim Of Biosafety Training Is To Increase Your Ability To Recognize And Reduce Hazards In a BSL1 Lab

Split! Carpet and Upholstery Cleaner SDS DATE: 5 /07 / 2015 SAFETY DATA SHEET

ACB Yogurt Extract Probiotic + Efficacious Moisturizer + Enhances Cellular Renewal. Tomorrow s Vision Today!

Product Safety Data Sheet

Effectiveness of Commercially-Available Cosmetic Cleaners on Cosmetics and Cosmetic Brushes

Basic Microbiology and Immunology Practical Course

Welcome. to Infection Control. Cutan. Trada.Co

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Description: SAF FRESH

Instructor Guide. Georgia Department of Technical and Adult Education. Decontamination and Infection Control

Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan. December 2003

Appendix C. Infectious Waste Guidelines

Roosevelt Biosafety Training. Created 10/2015

Enhanced BSL2 (BSL2+) Lab Policy IBC Policy # Approved: 10/3/18

Microdot Bleach Wipe

GECDSB WHMIS Training 2017

Material Safety Data Sheet. Pure & Clean Wound Cleanser OTC Solution. March 2016

Student Performance Guide. Student Performance Guide. Student Performance Guide. Student Performance Guide. LESSON 3-3 Bleeding Time

Component Classification Concentration Sodium carbonate CAS-No. EC-No. Index-No.

Material Safety Data Sheet Nixall Disinfectant + Cleanser EPA Reg. # January 2012

Maintenance Guidelines Ellipsis

CLINITEX A RANGE OF WIPES, CLEANSING & JANITORIAL PRODUCTS FOR HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS

Bloodborne Pathogens: Exposure In The Workplace Employee Handbook

GENERAL LAB SAFETY RULES. The following is a small list of the rules that MUST be followed in the lab!

Maintenance Guidelines Bluff

3M Tegaderm High Performance. Foam Adhesive Dressing. Application. and Removal. Pocket Guide

NATRUE Label: requirements to be met by natural and organic cosmetics Version

Transcription:

The Effectiveness of Water, Sodium Hypochlorite Bleach, and Peroxyacetic Acid (PAA) in Eradicating Listeria monocytogenes from the Surface of Cantaloupes Background Tina Rodrigues, B.S. Jonathan Howarth Ph.D October 19, 2011 Enviro Tech Chemical Services Modesto CA 95358 The outside surfaces of raw cantaloupes are rarely washed with antimicrobial solutions at processing facilities because only the inside of the fruit is eaten. On the other hand, when the cantaloupe is cut into pieces, the knife can act as a vector to translocate surfaceassociated bacteria from the outside to the inside fruit. Listeria monocytogenes is a virulent food-borne pathogenic bacterium, naturally-occurring in the environment and is often found in the soil, precisely where cantaloupes are grown. A Listeria monocytogenes outbreak traced to tainted cantaloupes from Jensen Farms and Frontera (shipped July 29 through September 10) to at least 24 states has claimed the lives of at least 23 people and sickened 123 in 25 states so far, becoming the most deadly food-borne illness outbreak in United States history. This prompted us to consider whether there was a simple safeguard available to both the consumer and the producer that could improve current practices used to eliminate or reduce the infective risks. A very simple experiment was devised: The surfaces of store-bought cantaloupe peel slices were inoculated with a laboratory culture of Listeria monocytogenes by spraying a suspension of the culture onto the cantaloupe peels and allowing to dry. Then the cantaloupe peels were rinsed with one of the following: (1) plain city water, (2) a solution of sodium hypochlorite bleach, or (3) a solution of peroxyacetic acid. The amount of viable Listeria bacteria rinsed from the surface of the cantaloupes was measured by plating the respective rinse solutions. Recognizing that it is not the amount of bacteria in the rinse solutions that pose a menace to the public, rather it is the amount of bacteria still resident on the cantaloupe that is critical, the surfaces were swabbed for bacteria after the respective rinses in order to determine the relative effectiveness. Materials and Methods Page 1 of 7

Listeria monocytogenes bacteria (ATCC 13932) were cultured in nutrient broth (Sigma, St. Louis, MS) by incubating for two days at 35 o C. The bacteria were separated from the nutrient broth by centrifugation, and resuspended in 150 ml of sterile Butterfield s Buffer contained in a spray bottle. A determination of the amount of Listeria bacteria in suspension was performed through common plating techniques (described later), and was found to be log 10 7.64 CFU/ml (4.4 x 10 7 ). Two cantaloupes used in the study were purchased at a local supermarket. Each cantaloupe was sliced into 8 equal pieces and the peel was separated from the fruit. Twelve of the cantaloupe peels were used in this study and can be seen in Image 1. Holding the spray bottle about 6 inches from the cantaloupe peels, the surfaces were doused with a fine spray of the Listeria suspension. Care was taken to ensure that the peels were covered evenly, see Image 2. They were then left to dry for one hour. Image 1: Cantaloupe peels used in this study Image 2: Listeria inoculation Page 2 of 7

When the cantaloupe peels were dry, they were randomly sorted into two groups of five and one group of two. The two groups of five were each used as test groups and the remaining two were used as the control group which was simply a test using Modesto city water. Each group of cantaloupe peels were placed in sterile poultry rinse bags for contact with one of the following rinse solutions: (1) 200 ml of Modesto city water (control), adjusted to ph 7. (2) 500 ml of Modesto city water containing 60 ppm (as Cl 2 ) of sodium hypochlorite bleach (NaOCl), adjusted to ph 7. (3) 500 ml of Modesto city water containing 60 ppm of peroxyacetic acid (PAA) from BioSide HS15%. The cantaloupe peels were then gently tumbled in the rinse solution for exactly two minutes, after which a 10% solution of erythorbic acid was added to each bag to neutralize the remaining hydrogen peroxide and PAA (3.0 g) or bleach (0.71 g). Each rinse solution was serially diluted using Butterfield s Buffer and plated onto 3M Environmental Listeria Petrifilms. Each set of wet cantaloupe peels were then assigned to a microbiology technician who was unaware which rinsing solution had been used on which set of cantaloupe peels. Using gloved hands to hold the cantaloupe peel, the technician swabbed half of the surface of the still-wet peel with a Q-tip-like swab. No area of the surface was contacted more than once with the swab, which was rotated slightly between swabbing strokes for uniform distribution of bacteria on to the swab. This was followed by vortexing the swab into the 1 ml buffer that came with the Quickswab in order to dislodge the bacteria from the swab and into the aqueous phase. Another swab was then used to swab the other half of the peel in identical fashion. Thus, two fresh Quickswabs were used for each cantaloupe peel. The buffers containing viable bacteria swabbed from the cantaloupes were subsequently serially diluted using Butterfield s buffer, and plated onto 3M Environmental Listeria Petrifilms. The Petrifilms were then incubated for 28 hours at 35C, upon which they were enumerated. Results and Discussion Microbiological Quality of the Rinse Waters The results of measuring the viability of Listeria bacteria washed into the aqueous phase have important ramifications in commercial processing operations where wash and rinse water is recycled and reused. The more effective a chemical program is in eradicating Page 3 of 7

aqueous phase bacteria, the less likely that rinsed fruit will be recontaminated by redeposition of viable bacteria present in the recycled water. Table 1 records the log 10 CFU/ml of the Listeria bacteria in the water used to rinse the cantaloupe peels whose surfaces had been inoculated with Listeria. As evidenced by the log 10 CFU/ml for the city water control, the data in Table 1 shows that considerable amounts of viable Listeria bacteria can be washed from the surface of the cantaloupes with a simple rinse of water containing no sanitizing chemicals. When the rinse water contains either NaOCl or PAA, the amount of viable bacteria remaining in the aqueous phase is measurably lower. It can be seen that at the two minute contact time, both chemical treatments at 60 ppm have a dramatic impact upon the Listeria bacteria washed into the aqueous phase compared to the untreated control as there was a 99.24% reduction for PAA and 98.62% reduction in Listeria bacteria using NaOCl bleach. Table 1: Log 10 CFU/ml Listeria Bacteria in the Respective Rinse Waters Log 10 CFU/ml Remaining Log 10 Reduction (% reduction) City water (control) 6.16 N/A 60 ppm (as Cl 2 ) NaOCl 4.30 1.86 (98.62%) 60 ppm PAA 4.04 2.12 (99.24%) Microbiological Quality of the Rinsed Cantaloupes It is obvious that it is not the amount of bacteria in the rinse solutions that pose a threat to the public; rather it is the amount of bacteria still resident on the fruit surface after the rinsing step that is the important public health issue. Therefore, after the respective rinses, the surfaces of the cantaloupe peels were swabbed in order to determine the relative effectiveness of each rinsing/sanitizing program. Tables 2-4 report the log 10 CFU/cantaloupe peel of the Listeria bacteria remaining on the surface of the peel after the respective rinse treatment. It can be seen that rinsing the cantaloupe peels with 60 ppm NaOCl solution for two minutes affords an additional log 10 1.47 CFU/cantaloupe peel reduction in surfaceassociated Listeria compared to rinsing the cantaloupes in water alone. When expressed in terms of the % reduction, compared to the water wash alone, this amounts to 96.61%. Contrast this with the performance of the 60 ppm PAA rinse solution. PAA yields an additional log 10 2.08 CFU/cantaloupe peel reduction in surface-associated Listeria, compared to rinsing the cantaloupe peels in water alone. When expressed in terms of the Page 4 of 7

% reduction, compared to the water wash alone, this amounts to 99.17%. A graphical representation of the data reported in Tables 2-4 can be seen in Figure 1. Table 2: Log 10 CFU/cantaloupe peel of Listeria Bacteria Remaining on the Surface using Modesto City Water Description log 10 (Canteloupe Peel) Control Cantaloupe Sample 1 5.49 Control Cantaloupe Sample 2 5.22 Average: 5.36 Standard deviation: 0.191 Table 3: Log 10 CFU/cantaloupe peel of Listeria Bacteria Remaining on the Surface using 60 ppm Cl 2 (from bleach) Description log 10 (Cantaloupe Peel) Bleach Cantaloupe Sample 1 3.76 Bleach Cantaloupe Sample 2 3.80 Bleach Cantaloupe Sample 3 3.57 Bleach Cantaloupe Sample 4 4.10 Bleach Cantaloupe Sample 5 4.23 Average: 3.89 Standard deviation: 0.268 log 10 reduction: 1.47 Percent reduction: 96.61% Table 4: Log 10 CFU/cantaloupe peel of Listeria Bacteria Remaining on the Surface using 60 ppm PAA Description log 10 (Cantaloupe Peel) PAA Cantaloupe Sample 1 3.34 PAA Cantaloupe Sample 2 3.37 PAA Cantaloupe Sample 3 3.39 PAA Cantaloupe Sample 4 3.04 PAA Cantaloupe Sample 5 3.27 Average: 3.28 Standard deviation: 0.143 log 10 reduction: 2.08 Percent reduction: 99.17% Page 5 of 7

Figure 1: A graphical representation of the log10 CFU/cantaloupe peel remaining. Figure 2: A graphical representation of the log10 CFU/cantaloupe peel reduction. Page 6 of 7

Conclusions The purpose of this study was to determine whether peroxyacetic acid or sodium hypochlorite bleach is effective in eradicating Listeria contaminated cantaloupes. After the two minute contact time, compared to the city water control, the NaOCl treatment affords a log 10 reduction of 1.86 CFU/ml that corresponds to a 98.62% reduction in aqueous phase Listeria bacteria. Over the same time period, the PAA treatment had a log 10 reduction of 2.12 (99.24%) in Listeria bacteria that were washed from the fruit and into the aqueous phase. A two-minute rinse of Listeria-contaminated cantaloupes using sodium hypochlorite bleach rinse (60 ppm as Cl 2 ) over two minutes provides a 96.61% reduction in surface-associated bacteria compared to the city water rinse. A twominute peroxyacetic acid rinse (60 ppm as PAA) provides a 99.17% reduction in surface-associated bacteria compared to the city water rinse. Although sodium hypochlorite displays a good reduction on cantelope surfaces associated Listeria bacteria, the reduction for PAA is superior. On the other hand the melons purchased for this study had previously been water washed to remove soil and debris. Had sodium hypochlorite or PAA been used in the rinse water, this disparity in performance would be expected to widen further. This is because it is known that the performance of chlorinated products is compromised by the presence of organic nitrogen present in the soils and on organic surfaces to form stable N-chloro complexes. PAA is much less reactive to organic nitrogen, and the efficacy of PAA is much less compromised by the presence of soils and other organic material. The data strongly highlights the need for PAA to be used for food safety purposes. At 60-100 ppm PAA, no further rinsing would be required because at this low concentration, PAA is well below detection by smell or taste. In addition, there are no hazardous by-products or toxicology or dietary concerns (as contrasted with sodium hypochlorite bleach). Page 7 of 7