Written in Bones Studies on technological and social contexts of past faunal skeletal remains

Similar documents
Written in Bones Studies on technological and social contexts of past faunal skeletal remains

Mesolithic bone tools of South-West Europe : the example of the French site of le Cuzoul de Gramat

PLEISTOCENE ART OF THE WORLD

3. The new face of Bronze Age pottery Jacinta Kiely and Bruce Sutton

The lithic assemblage from Kingsdale Head (KH09)

Fieldwalking at Cottam 1994 (COT94F)

PRELIMINARY REPORT FROM THE NEW EXCAVATION IN BABA CAVE, GRĂDINA VILLAGE, CONSTANȚA COUNTY

4. Fauna and fulachta fiadh: animal bones from burnt mounds on the N9/N10 Carlow Bypass Auli Tourunen

BONE AND ANTLER ARTEFACTS DISCOVERED IN THE MEDIEVAL SETTLEMENT OF OLD ORHEI (REPUBLIC OF MOLDAVIA)

7. Prehistoric features and an early medieval enclosure at Coonagh West, Co. Limerick Kate Taylor

Novington, Plumpton East Sussex

Burrell Orchard 2014: Cleveland Archaeological Society Internship Amanda Ponomarenko The Ohio State University June - August 2014

Specialist Report 11 Worked Flint by Hugo Anderson-Whymark

Lanton Lithic Assessment

A Fieldwalking Project At Sompting. West Sussex

39, Walnut Tree Lane, Sudbury (SUY 073) Planning Application No. B/04/02019/FUL Archaeological Monitoring Report No. 2005/112 OASIS ID no.

Global Prehistory. 30, BCE The Origins of Images

Test-Pit 3: 31 Park Street (SK )

Peace Hall, Sydney Town Hall Results of Archaeological Program (Interim Report)

SARMIZEGETUSA ULPIA TRAIANA CAPITAL OF THE DACIAN PROVINCES

IRAN. Bowl Northern Iran, Ismailabad Chalcolithic, mid-5th millennium B.C. Pottery (65.1) Published: Handbook, no. 10

Evidence for the use of bronze mining tools in the Bronze Age copper mines on the Great Orme, Llandudno

MUSEUM LffiRARY. George C. Vaillant Book Fund

Church of St Peter and St Paul, Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire

16 members of the Fieldwalking Group met York Community Archaeologist Jon Kenny at Lou Howard s farm, Rose Cottage Farm, at

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT BRIGHTON POLYTECHNIC, NORTH FIELD SITE, VARLEY HALLS, COLDEAN LANE, BRIGHTON. by Ian Greig MA AIFA.

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate Cambridgeshire

Chapter 2. Remains. Fig.17 Map of Krang Kor site

Andrey Grinev, PhD student. Lomonosov Moscow State University REPORT ON THE PROJECT. RESEARCH of CULTURAL COMMUNICATIONS

Fort Arbeia and the Roman Empire in Britain 2012 FIELD REPORT

NGSBA Excavation Reports

Aeneolithic osseous materials artefacts discovered in Southern Moldova. The DanubiOs Project

PROTECTIVE ARCHEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS ON THE SITE IN PODUMKA NEAR ORLOVAT

ST PATRICK S CHAPEL, ST DAVIDS PEMBROKESHIRE 2015

METALLURGY IN THE BRONZE AGE TELL SETTLEMENTS

Life and Death at Beth Shean

Archaeological Material From Spa Ghyll Farm, Aldfield

Greater London Region GREATER LONDON 3/567 (E.01.K099) TQ BERMONDSEY STREET AND GIFCO BUILDING AND CAR PARK

Opium Cabin excavation Passport In Time July 21-25, 2014

Bronze Age 2, BC

A Report on the Examination of Animal Skin Artefacts from the Bronze Age Salt Mines of Hallstatt, Austria

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate, Cambridgeshire. Autumn 2014 to Spring Third interim report

Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography. Safar Ashurov

Artifacts. Antler Tools

VII. List of Figures: Fig. No.

HISTORY. Subject : History (For under graduate student) Topic No. & Title : Unit- 4 Indus Civilization Topic- c Chalcolithic Cultures of India

Interdisciplinarity Research in Archaeology

Archaeological trial-trenching evaluation at Chappel Farm, Little Totham, Essex. April 2013

Hembury Hillfort Lesson Resources. For Key Stage Two

Difference between Architecture and Sculpture. Architecture refers to the design and construction of buildings

Essex Historic Environment Record/ Essex Archaeology and History

Moray Archaeology For All Project

The Euphrates Valley Expedition

Digging in the Dirt. Attending an archaeological field school. Neil & Karen Peterson

New Composting Centre, Ashgrove Farm, Ardley, Oxfordshire

Fieldwalk On Falmer Hill, Near Brighton - Second Season

10TH BONE COUNCIL. organized. by: de AV 14. , BEOGRAD, 2 GUST 201

Evolution of the Celts Unetice Predecessors of Celts BCE Cultural Characteristics:

Grim s Ditch, Starveall Farm, Wootton, Woodstock, Oxfordshire

Please see our website for up to date contact information, and further advice.

UNCORRECTED ARCHIVE REPORT APPENDIX 10 BONE IMPLEMENTS. by Joy Browning

Drills, Knives, and Points from San Clemente Island

Ancient Ireland. Mesolithic Neolithic Bronze Age Iron Age (Celts) Early Christian Ireland

3.4 The prehistoric lithic assemblage by I.P. Brooks. Introduction. Raw materials. Distribution

Advanced archaeology at the archive. Museum of London Support materials AS/A2 study day

International Exhibition of Footwear, Accessories and Materials.

4 th International Meeting of the Worked Bone Research Group 26 th 31 st of August 2003 Institute of History, Rüütli 6, Tallinn, Estonia

This is a repository copy of Anglo-Saxon settlements and archaeological visibility in the Yorkshire Wolds.

DEMARCATION OF THE STONE AGES.

An archaeological watching brief and recording at Brightlingsea Quarry, Moverons Lane, Brightlingsea, Essex October 2003

St Germains, Tranent, East Lothian: the excavation of Early Bronze Age remains and Iron Age enclosed and unenclosed settlements

1 INTRODUCTION 1. Show the children the Great Hall Finds.

Oil lamps (inc early Christian, top left) Sofia museum

Changing People Changing Landscapes: excavations at The Carrick, Midross, Loch Lomond Gavin MacGregor, University of Glasgow

Education Pack for Junior Certificate History

ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S. St Nicholas' Church, Barrack Hill, Nether Winchendon, Buckinghamshire. Archaeological Watching Brief.

SALVAGE EXCAVATIONS AT OLD DOWN FARM, EAST MEON

1 The East Oxford Archaeology and History Project

The Vikings Begin. This October, step into the magical, mystical world of the early Vikings. By Dr. Marika Hedin

Report of the 2017 PEATS Portugal Chalcolithic to Bronze Age Placement

The Neolithic Spiritual Landscape

Search of Highland Sites & Monuments Record for Useable Mesolithic Information

An archaeological evaluation at 16 Seaview Road, Brightlingsea, Essex February 2004

Human with Feline Head from Hohlenstein-Stadel, Germany. ca. 30,000-28,000 B.C.E. mammoth ivory 11 5/8 in. high

Bioarchaeology of the Near East 3:47 51 (2009) Short Fieldwork Report: Gohar Tepe (Iran), season 2009 A. Sołtysiak, A. Mahfroozi

Product price list The minimum order is 20 pieces.

Moated Site at Manor Farm, Islip, Oxfordshire

Neolithic Life and Death in the Desert - 8 seasons of excavations at. Jebel al-buhais

Gravettian art of Pavlov I and VI: an aggregation site and an episodic site compared

air museum Myssle Hrn iarska 13, Košice, Slovakia ( Institute of Archeology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hrnčiarska

Human remains from Estark, Iran, 2017

2 Saxon Way, Old Windsor, Berkshire

Cetamura Results

The Chalcolithic in the Near East: Mesopotamia and the Levant

Old iron-producing furnaces in the eastern hinterland of Bagan, Myanmar.

Censer Symbolism and the State Polity in Teotihuacán

Chapter 2: Archaeological Description

An archaeological evaluation in the playground of Colchester Royal Grammar School, Lexden Road, Colchester, Essex

Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE DATING OF SOME PIECES BELONGING TO SUCEVIŢA MONASTERY

Transcription:

Written in Bones Studies on technological and social contexts of past faunal skeletal remains edited by Justyna Baron Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska Uniwersytet Wrocławski Instytut Archeologii Wrocław 2011

Institute of Archaeology, University of Wrocław, 2011 Editors Justyna Baron and Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska Reviewers Arkadiusz Marciniak, Jarosław Wilczyński Layout Janusz M. Szafran, Jarosław Michalak Cover Justyna Baron Institute of Archaeology, University of Wrocław and individual authors 2011 ISBN 978-83-61416-64-7 Wrocławska Drukarnia Naukowa PAN im. Stanisława Kulczyńskiego Sp. z o.o. 53-505 Wrocław, ul. Lelewela 4

Contents Preface... 5 Methods and methodology Steven P. Ashby The Language of the Combmaker: interpreting complexity in Viking-Age Industry... 9 Elisabeth A. Stone The Role of Ethnographic Museum Collections in Understanding Bone Tool Use... 25 Materials and technology Aline Averbouh, Jean-Marc Pétillon Identification of debitage by fracturation on reindeer antler: case study of the Badegoulian levels at the Cuzoul de Vers (Lot, France)... 41 Bárbara Avezuela Aristu, Esteban Álvarez-Fernández, Jesús Jordá Pardo, Emilio Aura Tortosa The barnacles: A new species used to make a Gravettian suspended object from Nerja Cave (Málaga, Spain)... 53 Benjamin Marquebielle Mesolithic bone tools in Southwestern Europe: the example of the French site of Le Cuzoul de Gramat... 63 Stefan Pratsch Mesolithic antler artefacts in the North European Plain... 79 Marcin Diakowski Bone and antler artefacts from Pobiel 10, Lower Silesia, Poland. Are they really Mesolithic?... 93 Selena Vitezović The Neolithic Bone Industry from Drenovac, Serbia... 117 Erika Gál Prehistoric antler- and bone tools from Kaposújlak-Várdomb (South-Western Hungary) with special regard to the Early Bronze Age implements... 137 Peggy Morgenstern Typical hide working tools from the late Bronze Age of Moldova... 165 Corneliu Beldiman, Diana-Maria Sztancs, Viorica Rusu-Bolindeţ, Irina Adriana Achim Skeletal technologies, metal-working and wheat harvesting: ancient bone and antler anvils for manufacturing saw-toothed iron sickles discovered in Romania... 173

4 Katrin Struckmeyer The bone tools from the dwelling mound Feddersen Wierde, Germany, and their functions... 187 Marloes Rijkelijkhuizen Dutch medieval bone and antler combs... 197 Hans Christian Küchelmann Whale Bones as architectural elements in and around Bremen, Germany... 207 Marloes Rijkelijkhuizen Large or small? African elephant tusk sizes and the Dutch ivory trade and craft... 225 Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska The Hamburgian Zinken perforators and burins flint tools as evidence of antler working... 233 Social contexts Heidi Luik, Mirja Ots, Liina Maldre From the Neolithic to the Bronze Age: continuity and changes in bone artefacts in Saaremaa, Estonia... 243 Florentina Oleniuc, Luminiţa Bejenaru Preliminary Data Concerning the Manufacturing of Animal Raw Materials in the Chalcolithic Cucuteni B Settlement of Poduri-Dealul Ghindaru, Romania... 263 Manuel Altamirano García Bone industry from the Bronze Age in Central Iberia. The Settlement of La Motilla Del Azuer... 273 Justyna Baron Ritual contexts of animal bone deposits from the Roman Iron Age settlement at Magnice, SW Poland... 285 Felix Lang Activity not Profession. Considerations about Bone Working in Roman Times... 295 Magdalena Konczewska Bone, horn and antler working in medieval Wrocław... 305 Kamilla Pawłowska The remains of a late medieval workshop in Inowroclaw (Kuyavia, Poland): horncores, antlers and bones... 313 Authors Adresses... 321

Peggy Morgenstern Typical hide working tools from the late Bronze Age of Moldova Excavations at the late Bronze Age site of Odaia/Moldova yielded a significant bone artefact assemblage dominated by bone points and rib scrapers. The site itself is located within a concentration of ash-heaps between the forest steppe and steppe zones on the western bank of the Dniestr. This analysis focuses on a specific tool from the Noua-Sabatinovka cultural complex. There is a little archeological evidence for its use in Moldova and Romania, especially in the late Bronze Age period. At these tools the scapula epiphyses had been notched. The notched teeth thus create a working edge, often displaying a high, glossy polish. Use-wear analysis has been undertaken to interpret the functional role of a sample of characteristic tools from Odaia. It is suggested here that these tools were used as scrapers for hide-working. Keywords: late Bronze Age, Moldova, Noua-Sabatinovka culture complex, ash-heaps, settlement artefacts Introduction The following text deals with an analysis of a bone tool, made from the scapulae of large mammals, which was prevalent in the steppe cultures of south eastern Europe (Fig.1). Over the past decades, scientists have ascribed many different interpretations concerning the origins and functions of this Fig. 1. A selection of several tools from the site of Miciurin-Odaia (Photo: P. Morgenstern)

166 Peggy Morgenstern The site of Miciurin-Odaia tool type. Here the worked bone material of the late Bronze Age site of Miciurin-Odaia will be discussed in light of an analysis of use-wear. As the result of cooperation between the Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology of the Free University of Berlin and the Section of Ethnography and Art History of the Moldovan Academy of Science, research on a site of the Noua-Sabatinovka culture was carried out. Excavations at the settlement site of Miciurin-Odaia took place between 2003 and 2005. The late bronze age site in the north of Moldova yielded numerous artefacts made from bone and antler. The settlement site of Miciurin-Odaia is located in the northern part of Moldova (Fig. 2). The steppe landscape has a very arid climate. The site itself consists of 25 ash-heaps, situated at the edge of a southern slope, which forms the bank of a stream (Kaiser, Sava 2006:170-171). The mounds do not appear to have any kind of a discernible pattern. Four of these mounds were examined over four campaign seasons (Fig. 3). The excavation of the ash-heaps revealed numerous pits and stone concen- Fig. 2. The north Moldovian site of Miciurin-Odaia (after Kaiser, Sava 2006) Fig. 3. Miciurin-Odaia. Topographical map of the site (after Kaiser 2007) 1 1 Special thanks to the excavators of Miciurin-Odaia E. Kaiser and E. Sava for this map.

Typical hide working tools from the late Bronze Age of Moldova 167 trations which yielded ceramic shards and objects made from bone, antler, clay, flint, stone and bronze. The assemblage of bone artefacts was dominated by bone points and chisels, polished ribs, femora with perforated epiphyses, ground astragali and notched scapulae (Morgenstern in press). The archaeological culture The Noua-Sabatinovka culture dates to the second half of the second millennium BC and comprised a territory that reached from the Carpathian Mountains in the West to the Dnieper River in the East and from the upper Dniester River in the north to the lower Danube River in the South (Fig. 4). The culture is characterized by non-fortified settlements with semi-subterranean houses with a wood- Fig. 4. Distribution of the Noua-Sabatinovka-Culture (after Florescu 1964) Fig. 5. Miciurin-Odaia. Ash-heaps 14-21 in spring 2005 (Photo: E. Kaiser)

168 daub superstructure (Sava 1998:271). In the western part of the territory there are also surface wattle and daub buildings that sit on the ground surface with stone foundations. A special feature of Noua-Sabatinovka settlement sites are the so-called Zol niki (ash-heaps). These are circular or oval discolorations of light-grey soil, which was visible as a mound before the intensification of agriculture (Fig. 5). The ash-heaps, which are arranged in clusters of up to 40 mounds, contain settlement remains such as ceramic shards, faunal remains and artefacts. These ashheaps have been interpreted as fireplaces, remains of dwelling houses or ritual places. Biochemical studies Peggy Morgenstern The tool type of the sediments have demonstrated that the material of Miciurin-Odaia are not ash-remains. The functional role of the mounds remains is still not known. In accord with the arid climate of the steppe lands in the eastern part of the Noua-Sabatinovka culture distribution area, the faunal remains from the settlement sites are characterized by teeth and bones from cattle, sheep, goat and horse (Sava 2005:145). Pigs appear to be very rare in this arid zone. However, sites in the forestlands of the Carpathians, with a greater abundance of food was much better, with a higher proportion of pig remains as well as wild mammals (Sava 2005:147, Fig.2). Twelve fragments of notched scapulas were recovered from the faunal remains of Miciurin-Odaia. The tools are made of cattle and horse scapulae and are generally badly fragmented and with weathered surfaces. These scapula-tools have a notched pattern along the distal epiphyses, forming a halfmoon shape (Fig. 6). The notched edges, like worn down teeth, were regularly located on the edge opposite the Tuber scapulae, that is, on the dorsal edge. Distribution of the tool The distribution of this kind of artefact, concentrated in the ash-heaps, comprises the same territory as the distribution area of the late Bronze Age Noua- Sabatinovka culture. The map shows the distribution of the finds (Fig.7). The tools are known from numerous settlement sites such as Cobîlnea (Levitsckii, Sava 1993, Fig. 13; Sava 1998:274), Petruşeni La Cigoreanu (Leviţkii, Sava 1995:173, Fig. 5), Lupşanu, Cavadineşti, Rusenii Noi, Gîrbovăţ, Tanacu (Florescu 1991:287, Fig. 115), Sabatinovka, Valea Lupuliu Iaşi, Andieşeni, Ušalka, Nicoleni (Florescu 1964:160, Fig. 11), Peresadovka (Pogrebova 1960:83, Fig.7,5), Bîrlad (Haimovici 1964:225, Fig. 1), Novoselickovo Zol nika (Černikov 1985:87, Fig. 40) and Stepovoje (Berezanskaja, Šarafutdinova 1985:497, Fig. 135). Fragments of notched tools may already be found in the worked osseous assemblages of a few middle Bronze Age settlement sites, such as Doamnei and Otopani, of the late Wietenberg and Tei cultures (Andriţoiu 1992:66; Leahu 1963:340, Fig. 7,3). These sites were located in the southwestern part of the distribution area. With the findplace of Nikolaevskoe Poselenie, there is also evidence on the eastern edge of this tool type in the middle Bronze Age Srubnaja culture (Privalova, Privalov 1987:106). The development of the tool must therefore have begun in the transition from the middle to late Bronze Age, from 1500 1200 BC. According to E. Sava, the wide range of bone tools in the culture of Noua-Sabatinovka shows the influence of eastern cultures (Sava 1998:277). Therefore, it can be assumed that the tool-type was developed in the area of the eastern steppe cultures. The use-wears Previously, notched scapula-tools have been described as tools used for the decoration of pottery. A short while ago, the Ukrainian and Russian archaeologists V.B. Pankovs kij and G.F. Korobkova have come to regard the connection of these tools with leather processing (Pankovs kij 2003:143-144). After an analyse of use-wears they came to suggest that these scapula-tools were used as punches in the leather decoration. Following my own microscopic examinations using a 100x magnification, the assessment of the level of tooth wear on four of twelve tools indicates the presence of a high, glossy and invasive polish (Fig. 8). Invasive polish means that the whole surface and the striations within are covered by the polish. At a magnification of 200x the surface appeared very smooth nearly without marks and only a few scratches

Typical hide working tools from the late Bronze Age of Moldova Fig. 6. Miciurin-Odaia. Notched scapula-tools made from cattle and horse scapulas Fig. 7. The circles showing the distribution of the scapula-tools (after Pankovs kij 2003) 169

170 Peggy Morgenstern Fig. 8. Tool 124/37 100x magnification (Photo: P. Morgenstern) Fig. 9. Tool 199/60 200x magnification (Photo: P. Morgenstern) (Fig. 9). The osteons, the holes of nutriant canals, were visible. This indicates that the working surface was coming into intensive contact with soft moist materials such as fur, skin, meat and fat. The functional appearance of the tool and clusters of traces suggests how the notched scapulae might have been used. The functional role Based on these wear patterns, these objects were used as defleshers to remove meat, fat and connective tissue remains from the back of fresh hides in the first step of leather production. In medieval tanneries after soaking, they removed any remaining flesh and fat by using scratchers and fleshing knifes although the later historic use of such notched tools is unknown (Fig. 10). There is another well-known example of such tool use from the last century. North American Indians used a similarly notched tool for softening tanned skins (Feustel 1980:17). The tools were normally made from cervid metatarsi (Fig. 11). Northe also offered another kind of flat scapulatools with a notched working edge from late Neolithic and early Bronze Age settlement sites of Fig. 10. Hide-working (A. Schweitzer around 1800)

Typical hide working tools from the late Bronze Age of Moldova 171 Fig. 11. A deflesher formerly used in hide cleaning by Plains Indians (after Feustel 1980) Fig. 12. Recent tools used by taxidermists in Halle (Photo: P. Morgenstern) central Europe (Northe 2001:179-184). Use-wears indicate that several of them could be used for hide-working. It seems quite reasonable that cattle, sheep and goat hides were worked by such scapular defleshers with dull teeth in the Late Bronze Age as well. A more recent analogy for this kind of tool may be found in the laboratory of the Museum of Domestic Mammals in Halle/Saale in Germany (Fig. 12). Taxidermists generally remove flesh, fat and other connective tissues from the skins of mammals, birds and snakes with just such a deflesher. Conclusions Considering the use-wear analysis, the twelve scapula-tools with a notched pattern on the distal epiphysis from the north Moldovian settlement site of Miciurin- Odaia are used as tools for hide-working. Nearly all remains of this tool type are known from the Noua- Sabatinovka culture complex in the late Bronze Age period. Fragments of this tool are already appeared on a few sites of the late Wietenberg and Tei culture and the Srubnaja culture. Therefore the development of the tool must have begun in the middle Bronze Age. References Andritoiu, I. 1992. Civilizaţia tracilor din sud-vestul Transilvaniei în epoca bronzului, Biblioteca Thracologicã II, 1-244. Berezanskaja, S.S. and I.N. Šarafutdinova 1985. Sabatinovskaja kul tura, Archeologija Ukrainskoj SSR 1, 489-99.

172 Peggy Morgenstern Černjakov, I.T. 1985. Severo-Zapadnoe Pričernomor e vo vtoroj polovine II tys. do n. ė., Kiev: Naukova Dumka. Feustel, R. 1980. Neolithische Gerberwerkzeuge aus Knochen, Alt-Thüringen 17, 7-18. Florescu, A. 1964. Contribuţij la cunoaşterea culturii Noua, Arheologia Moldovei 2-3, 143-216. Florescu, A. 1991. Repertoriul culturii Noua-Coslogeni din România. Aşezări şi necropoli, Cultura şi civilizaţia la Dunărea de Jos 9, 1-414. Haimovici, S. 1964. Studii aspra resturilor de faună descoperite în aşezările aparţinind culturii Noua de la Bîrlad şi Piatra Neamţ, Arheologia Moldovei 2/3, 217-36. Leahu, V. 1963. O nouă fază în evolutia culturii Tei: faza Fundenii Doamnei, Cercetãri Arheologice în Bucureşti 1, 339-70. Leviţkii, O. and E. Sava. 1995. Aşezarea culturii Noua Petruşeni La Cigoreanu (inestigaţii de şantier în 1991), Cercetãri Arheologice în aria nord-tracã 1, 157-88. Levitsckii, O.G. and E.N. Sava. 1993. Nouvelles recherches des l établissements de la culture Noua la zone comprise entre le Prout et le Nistru, Culture et civilisation au Bas Danube 10, 125-57. Kaiser, E. and E. Sava. 2006. Die Aschehügel der späten Bronzezeit im Nordpontikum. Erste Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojektes in Nordmoldavien, Eurasia Antiqua 12, 167-202. Morgenstern, P. in print. Knochen- und Geweihartefakte aus den spätbronzezeitlichen Aschehügeln von Odaia einem Fundplatz der Noua-Sabatinovka-Kultur, In: E. Kaiser and E. Sava (eds.) Die Siedlung mit Aschehügeln von Miciurin/Odaia, Moldawien. (Archäologische und naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen), Biblioteca Tyragetia, Chisinau. Northe, A. 2001. Notched Implements made of Scapulae Still a Problem, In: A. Choyke and L. Bartosiewicz (eds.) Crafting Bone: Skeletal Technologies through Time and Space Proceedings of the 2nd meeting of the (ICAZ) Worked Bone Research Group Budapest, 31 August 5 September 1999, BAR Intern. Series 937, Oxford: Archaeopress, 179-184. Pankovs kij, V.B. 2003. Pro Priznačennja Zybčastich Lopatok, Archeologija 3, 134-44. Pogrebova, N.N. 1960. Peresadovskoe poselenie na Ingule, Sovetskaja Archeologija 4, 76-90. Privalova, O.Ja and A.I. Privalov. 1987. Poselenie ėpochi pozdnej bronzy vozle s. Nikolaevka v Severnom Priazov e, In: O.G. Šapošnikova (eds.) Drevnejšie skotovody stepej juga Ukrainy, Kiev: Naukova dumka, 94-107. Sava, E. 1998. Die Rolle der östlichen und westlichen Elemente in der Genesis des Noua-Sabatinovka- Kulturkomplexes. (Nach den Materialien des Pruth-Dnestr- Zwischenstromgebiets), In: B. Hänsel and J. Machnik (eds.) Das Karpatenbecken und die osteuropäische Steppe. Nomadenwege und Kulturaustausch in den vorchristlichen Metallzeiten (4000-500 v.chr.), München & Rahden/ Westf.: Marie Leidorf, 267-312. Sava, E. 2005. Viehzucht und Ackerbau in der Noua- Sabatinovka-Kultur, In: B. Horejs, R. Jung, E. Kaiser and B. Teržan (eds.) Interpretationsraum Bronzezeit, Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie 121, 143-59.