Managing a Masterpiece Fieldwalking at Stratford St Mary Higham HGM 023

Similar documents
ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

39, Walnut Tree Lane, Sudbury (SUY 073) Planning Application No. B/04/02019/FUL Archaeological Monitoring Report No. 2005/112 OASIS ID no.

An archaeological evaluation at 16 Seaview Road, Brightlingsea, Essex February 2004

Colchester Archaeological Trust Ltd. A Fieldwalking Survey at Birch, Colchester for ARC Southern Ltd

An archaeological watching brief and recording at Brightlingsea Quarry, Moverons Lane, Brightlingsea, Essex October 2003

Fieldwalking at Cottam 1994 (COT94F)

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate, Cambridgeshire. Autumn 2014 to Spring Third interim report

Cambridge Archaeology Field Group. Fieldwalking on the Childerley Estate Cambridgeshire

An archaeological evaluation in the playground of Colchester Royal Grammar School, Lexden Road, Colchester, Essex

Archaeological Material From Spa Ghyll Farm, Aldfield

Archaeological evaluation at the Onley Arms, The Street, Stisted, Essex

Novington, Plumpton East Sussex

An archaeological evaluation by trial-trenching at Playgolf, Bakers Lane, Westhouse Farm, Colchester, Essex

An archaeological evaluation at the Lexden Wood Golf Club (Westhouse Farm), Lexden, Colchester, Essex

New Composting Centre, Ashgrove Farm, Ardley, Oxfordshire

Archaeological trial-trenching evaluation at Chappel Farm, Little Totham, Essex. April 2013

2 Saxon Way, Old Windsor, Berkshire

Archaeological trial-trenching evaluation at Dale Hall, Cox s Hill, Lawford, Essex

A Fieldwalking Project At Sompting. West Sussex

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT BRIGHTON POLYTECHNIC, NORTH FIELD SITE, VARLEY HALLS, COLDEAN LANE, BRIGHTON. by Ian Greig MA AIFA.

Undley Hall, Lakenheath LKH 307

An archaeological watching brief at Sheepen, Colchester, Essex November-December 2003

Archaeological sites and find spots in the parish of Burghclere - SMR no. OS Grid Ref. Site Name Classification Period

Essex Historic Environment Record/ Essex Archaeology and History

An archaeological evaluation by trial-trenching at Scotts Farm, Lodge Lane, Purleigh, Essex October 2011

3. The new face of Bronze Age pottery Jacinta Kiely and Bruce Sutton

Grange Farm, Widmer End, Hughenden, Buckinghamshire

Whitton Church Lane (Recreation Ground) WHI 014

Suburban life in Roman Durnovaria

Test-Pit 3: 31 Park Street (SK )

Church of St Peter and St Paul, Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire

Grim s Ditch, Starveall Farm, Wootton, Woodstock, Oxfordshire

SALVAGE EXCAVATIONS AT OLD DOWN FARM, EAST MEON

An archaeological watching brief on one section of an Anglian Water main Spring Lane, Lexden, Colchester

Silwood Farm, Silwood Park, Cheapside Road, Ascot, Berkshire

Land at Ullswater Road, Campsea Ashe, Suffolk CAA 032. Archaeological Post-excavation Assessment DRAFT. Client: Flagship Housing Group

Former Whitbread Training Centre Site, Abbey Street, Faversham, Kent Interim Archaeological Report Phase 1 November 2009

Lanton Lithic Assessment

7. Prehistoric features and an early medieval enclosure at Coonagh West, Co. Limerick Kate Taylor

Excavation. Post-Medieval Ditches. Land off Norwich Common Road Wymondham Norfolk. Excavation. Client: November 2013

Archaeological Watching Brief (Phase 2) at Court Lodge Farm, Aldington, near Ashford, Kent December 2011

Small Finds Assessment, Minchery Paddock, Littlemore, Oxford (MP12)

Archaeological. Monitoring & Recording Report. Fulbourn Primary School, Cambridgeshire. Archaeological Monitoring & Recording Report.

An archaeological evaluation at the Blackwater Hotel, Church Road, West Mersea, Colchester, Essex March 2003

2010 Watson Surface Collection

THE RAVENSTONE BEAKER

Greater London Region GREATER LONDON 3/567 (E.01.K099) TQ BERMONDSEY STREET AND GIFCO BUILDING AND CAR PARK

ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S. St Nicholas' Church, Barrack Hill, Nether Winchendon, Buckinghamshire. Archaeological Watching Brief.

Fieldwalk On Falmer Hill, Near Brighton - Second Season

Moray Archaeology For All Project

ROMAN OBJECTS FROM LANCASHIRE AND CUMBRIA: A ROUND-UP OF FINDS REPORTED VIA THE PORT ABLE ANTIQUITIES SCHEME IN 2006

Report on an archaeological trial-trenching evaluation: proposed reservoir site, land north of Redgate House, Wherstead, Suffolk.

MARSTON MICHAEL FARLEY

FURTHER MIDDLE SAXON EVIDENCE AT COOK STREET, SOUTHAMPTON (SOU 567)

Erection of wind turbine, Mains of Loanhead, Old Rayne, AB52 6SX

Fort Arbeia and the Roman Empire in Britain 2012 FIELD REPORT

The lithic assemblage from Kingsdale Head (KH09)

THE UNFOLDING ARCHAEOLOGY OF CHELTENHAM

16 members of the Fieldwalking Group met York Community Archaeologist Jon Kenny at Lou Howard s farm, Rose Cottage Farm, at

Land North of Pesthouse Lane Barham Suffolk BRH 054

Report on archaeological fieldwalking and metal-detecting survey on land adjacent to Breck Farm, Stody, Norfolk

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION REPORT. Home Farm, Woolverstone

AN EARLY MEDIEVAL RUBBISH-PIT AT CATHERINGTON, HAMPSHIRE Bj>J. S. PILE and K. J. BARTON

63-66 Cannon Street Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Caistor Roman Project Interim Summary of 2015 Season of Test pits at Caistor Old Hall

SOUTH-WEST IPSWICH AND SOUTH SUFFOLK SIXTH FORM CENTRE, PINEWOOD, IPSWICH SPT 035

Section Worked stone catalogue By Hugo Anderson-Whymark

Greater London GREATER LONDON 3/606 (E ) TQ

Cetamura Results

An archaeological watching brief at St Leonard s church, Hythe Hill, Colchester, Essex

NOTE A THIRD CENTURY ROMAN BURIAL FROM MANOR FARM, HURSTBOURNE PRIORS. by. David Allen with contributions by Sue Anderson and Brenda Dickinson

Land off Lady Lane, Hadleigh HAD 089

Phase V, Liberty Village, RAF Lakenheath, Eriswell ERL 203

Moated Site at Manor Farm, Islip, Oxfordshire

Bronze Age 2, BC

Appendix 10.D Metal Detecting Report

Chapter 2. Remains. Fig.17 Map of Krang Kor site

A visit to the Wor Barrow 21 st November 2015

An archaeological evaluation at Dry Street, Basildon, Essex May-June 2006

63-66 Cannon Street Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Advanced archaeology at the archive. Museum of London Support materials AS/A2 study day

The Swan Hotel, Lavenham LVM 080

New Access Control, Gate 2, RAF Lakenheath. ERL 120

Lodge Road Ufford UFF 040

An archaeological evaluation at Thistle Hall, Mope Lane, Wickham Bishops, Essex July 2009

Archaeological Evaluation Report

S E R V I C E S. St John the Baptist Church, Penshurst, Kent. Archaeological Watching Brief. by Daniel Bray and James McNicoll-Norbury

This is a repository copy of Anglo-Saxon settlements and archaeological visibility in the Yorkshire Wolds.

3.4 The prehistoric lithic assemblage by I.P. Brooks. Introduction. Raw materials. Distribution

Monitoring Report No. 99

Carenza Lewis and Catherine Ranson

Oil lamps (inc early Christian, top left) Sofia museum

The results of field walking, casual observations, test pitting and an earthwork survey undertaken by CAFG within Haslingfield parish between

Neolithic and Roman remains on the Lufkins Farm reservoir site, Great Bentley, Essex October-November 2007

Barnet Battlefield Survey

Hembury Hillfort Lesson Resources. For Key Stage Two

Sudbury Rugby Ground, Great Cornard COG 028 and COG 030

An archaeological watching brief and evaluation at Great Notley business park, near Braintree, Essex June-September 2005

(photograph courtesy Earle Seubert)

EXCAVATION AT ST MARY'S ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON (SOU 379 AND SOU 1112)

Transcription:

Managing a Masterpiece Fieldwalking at Stratford St Mary Higham HGM 023 Archaeological Fieldwalking Report SCCAS Report No. 2012/202 Author: Jo Caruth August 2012 Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service

Managing a Masterpiece Fieldwalking at Stratford St Mary Higham HGM 023 Archaeological Fieldwalking Report SCCAS Report No. 2012/202 Author: Jo Caruth Contributions By: Simon Picard and Andy Fawcett Illustrator: Simon Picard Editor: Richenda Goffin Report Date: August/2012

HER Information Site Code: HGM 023 Site Name: Fieldwalking at Stratford St Mary Report Number: 2012/202 Date of Fieldwork: 3rd and 4th March 2012 Grid Reference: TM 0396 3509 Project Officer: Client/Funding Body: Jo Caruth Managing a Masterpiece, and HLF funded project Prepared By: Jo Caruth Date: August 2012 Approved By: Richenda Goffin Position: Finds/post-excavation manager Date: Signed:

Contents Summary Drawing Conventions 1. Introduction 1 2. Methodology 3 3. Results 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Ceramic material 5 3.3 Small finds 10 3.4 Glass 11 3.5 Worked flint 11 4 Discussion and conclusions 12 5. Acknowledgements 14 6 Plates 15 6.1 The fieldwalking, March 3rd and 4th, 2012 15 6.2 Metal detecting 22 6.3 Surveying and timekeeping 24 6.4 Finds washing and quantifying 25 List of Figures Figure 1. Location map, showing the field outline in red. 2 Figure 2. Plan of field showing numbered grid 4 Figure 3. Distribution of prehistoric pottery with cropmarks overlaid. 6 Figure 4. Distribution of Roman pottery with cropmarks overlaid. 6 Figure 5. Distribution of medieval pottery with cropmarks overlaid. 7 Figure 6. Distribution of post-medieval pottery with cropmarks overlaid. 8 Figure 7. Distribution of CBM (Roman marked) with cropmarks overlaid. 9 Figure 8. Distribution of metal finds with cropmarks overlaid. 9 Figure 9. Distribution of glass with cropmarks overlaid. 11 Figure 10. Distribution of worked flint and prehistoric pottery. 12 Figure 11. 2nd edition, 1905 Ordnance Survey Map with cropmarks overlaid. 14

List of Tables Table 1. Finds quantification 5 Table 2. Small finds by type 10 Table 3. Small finds by material 10 Table 4. Small finds by date 10 Table 5. Coin catalogue 10 Table 6. Worked flint quantities 11 List of Appendices Appendix 1. HMG 013 Pottery calague Appendix 2. HMG 013 CBM catalogue Appendix 3. HMG 013 Worked Flint catalogue Appendix 4: HMG 013 Small Finds catalogue

Summary A two day fieldwalking project was undertaken as part of the Managing a Masterpiece, an HLF funded project, in March 2012. A total of thirty-two volunteers walked a field NW of Stratford St Mary (in Higham parish). The field chosen has a number of undated cropmarks and the aim of the project was to try to provide evidence to help suggest potential dates for the underlying archaeology. The most significant finds were a small number of Iron Age pottery sherds and a scattering of worked flints of probable Iron Age date. Medieval and post-medieval pottery was found across the site, as was a large quality of Ceramic Building Material (CBM - brick and tile), which may have come from earlier buildings in the SE corner of the site or from 17th century buildings to the west and north-east of the field.

1. Introduction Two days were spent fieldwalking in Stratford St Mary on 3rd and 4th March 2012. The field actually lies within the parish of Higham at TM 0396 3509; the eastern edge of the field follows the parish boundary between Higham and Stratford St Mary. Higham Hall and the church are situated close to the west end of the field slightly removed from the centre of the village. A church is mentioned in the Domesday Book but the present building dates from about the 13th century. The field is on a north-west to south-east orientation, on a slight south-east facing slope and lies on the edge of the floodplain of the River Stour. There was a noticeable large hollow in the south-east corner of the field, said to be the site of an extraction pit and later a plant nursery(?) captured on an aerial photograph in 1945. The early Ordnance Survey maps show a footpath running diagonally across the field joining the two village centres. The field was primarily chosen for fieldwalking because of the number of undated cropmarks, identified from aerial photographs, recorded on it. The cropmarks which suggest ring-ditches and enclosures are part of a landscape of such monuments, including a cursus, which follow the north edge of the Stour valley just above the floodplain. It was hoped that the fieldwalking results would provide valuable evidence to date and interpret some of these. The project was hosted and funded by Managing the Masterpiece and was carried out by staff from Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service and thirty-two volunteers from the local community. Permission to walk the field was kindly given by the landowner Mr Gurney. 1

The White House 20.1m LB GP 18.0m Gildhall Co Const Bdy Post Office CR Barhams Manor Drain 11.0m Sinks Higham Hall 12.8m Pond Pond Tunmer's Farm CR Higham Hall Farm Pond Pond 13.1m Pond Pond Pond Def 11.9m Drain Ward Bdy Stourbrook Lodge Meadow View The Cottage Stourmead 7.9m Black Hall 7.9m FB FB 7.0m Lowe Hill House FB FB Pond GP Yewtree House Pond Village Hall 6 6 Pond Tennis Court Pond 30 King's Lynn Norfolk Norwich A Lowestoft Thetford SUFFOLK Bury St. Edmunds B Ipswich A Felixstowe Colchester Essex Chelmsford 0 25 km 0 2 km 6 03 600 6 04 000 6 04 400 B N Higham Ward Bdy CR 2 35 400 Tennis Court The Old Vicarage Green Lane Path (um) HIGHAM ROAD Drain St Mary's Church Tennis Court Higham Road Stratford St Mary Drain 2 35 000 CR Brook Farm Spring Farm HIGHAM ROAD 1.22m RH Glebe House Und Ward Bdy The Row Co Const Bdy 2 34 600 TM Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Suffolk County Council Licence No. 100023395 2013 0 400m Figure 1. Location map, showing the outline of the field in red. 2

2. Methodology At the time of the fieldwalking the field had been ploughed and weathered. The conditions on the second day were intermittently wet, with snow in the late afternoon. Prior to the start of the fieldwalking the field surface was noted to be stony, with frequent small abraded pieces of ceramic building material (CBM) on the surface, and several areas of yellow gravelly sand and other soil changes were apparent, indicating that ploughing has disturbed subsoil levels. The field was divided into 20m grid squares, marked by flagged canes and numbered alpha-numerically (Fig. 2). 2-3 people walked each square for exactly 10 minutes. All finds were collected, bagged and labelled using the HER code HGM 023 and the grid square number. The fieldwalking took place in the morning and early afternoon of each day. The field was metal detected by two experienced detectorists and finds were located using a RTK GPS. Finds were taken back to Stratford Village Hall and nonmetal finds were washed, identified and recorded during the later afternoon of each day. Ceramic Building Material (CBM) was largely counted and weighed on site and left within the squares; some was taken back to the village hall to speed up the quantification, this was then returned to site to fill potholes in the farm track alongside the south side of the field. Finds information was input onto an Access database and finds plotted using MapInfo. Selected finds distribution plots have been produced to accompany this report. 3

N N Crown Copyright. All Rights Reserved. Suffolk County Council Licence No. 100023395 2012 Figure 2. Plan of field showing numbered grid 4

3. Results 3.1 Introduction Pottery dating to the prehistoric, Roman, medieval and post-medieval periods was recovered and counts are displayed in the table below. In total one hundred and eighty-eight sherds of pre-modern pottery, fifty-four metal objects and ninety seven kilograms of brick and tile fragments were retrieved from the field Find type No. Weight in g Notes Preh pot 12 67 Incl. 9 small fragments from sq G12 Roman pot 5 58 Med pot 48 385 Post med pot 123 1453 Modern pot 55 533 Tile 4830 86395 Roman CBM 51 1880 Brick 93 9472 Other CBM 26 216 Worked flint 76 - Metal 16 - Glass 35 31 Table 1. Finds quantification 3.2 Ceramic material (identified by Andy Fawcett) A small assemblage of prehistoric pottery, identified as either Iron Age or probably Iron Age, was recovered with single sherds found in three locations in the south-east corner of the site. The overall amount of prehistoric pottery was bolstered by nine sherds being found in a single location towards the centre of the field, close to two circular cropmarks (Fig. 3), but these were tiny pieces and could not be more closely dated than Middle Bronze Age to Middle Iron Age, and may represent the remains of only one or two fragmented sherds. 5

Lidar data English Heritage Figure 3. Distribution of prehistoric pottery with cropmarks overlaid. Lidar data English Heritage Figure 4. Distribution of Roman pottery with cropmarks overlaid. 6

Roman pottery was found in four locations scattered across the site, in three cases as single sherds, and two sherds in square H6 (Fig. 4). Only one sherd could be dated more closely than Roman, a piece of a samian plate, (form Drg 18/31) from southern Gaul, dated to the late 1st or early 2nd century AD, found in square C18. Fifty-five pieces of Roman CBM were found amongst the vast quantity of later material. Unlike the pottery this was concentrated along the south edge of the field (Fig. 7). It is possible that this pattern reflects some collection bias, but as the CBM was recorded by the same team of SCCAS staff, it probably can't be explained as recording bias. Most pieces were flat, and probably represented fragments of tegula (flanged roof tile), but there were also two small pieces of box flue tile, which are usually associated with hypocaust systems. Lidar data English Heritage Figure 5. Distribution of medieval pottery with cropmarks overlaid. Medieval pottery (Fig. 5) was found across all parts of the site, possibly partly scattered as a result of manuring, but also reflecting the fact that Stratford (and the hamlet of Higham) were thriving medieval settlements. The pottery was dated 7

between 12th and 15th centuries, with no particular concentration or density of anything of a particular date. Notably there was no early medieval pottery found, although a settlement is recorded in Domesday. As is to be expected the majority of ceramic material found was post-medieval and modern (Figs. 6 and 7). The pottery was scattered fairly evenly across the site with a slight concentration in the south-east corner in the area of the large hollow. Lidar data English Heritage Figure 6. Distribution of post-medieval pottery with cropmarks overlaid. 8

Lidar data English Heritage Figure 7. Distribution of CBM (Roman marked) with cropmarks overlaid. Lidar data English Heritage Figure 8. Distribution of metal finds with cropmarks overlaid. 9

3.3 Small finds Fifty-four metal small finds were recovered from metal detecting (see Figure 8). These are summarised in the tables below, and catalogued as Appendix 4. A single item was identified as part of a medieval copper-alloy vessel but the remainder were post-medieval, modern or unidentified. ObjectType Number Buckle 2 Bullet 3 Bullet? 4 Button 1 Coin 8 Cratal bell 2 Fitting 1 Fragment 9 Knife 1 Mount 1 Musket shot 6 Seal 1 Seal? 1 Sheet 1 Strap end 1 Stud 2 Thimble 1 Token? 1 Vessel 1 Weight 7 Table 2. Small finds by type. Material Number Cu alloy 32 Cu alloy/lead 1 Iron? 1 Lead 17 Lead? 1 Other: White metal? 1 Silver 1 Table 3. Small finds by material. Period Number Medieval 1 Modern 22 Post-medieval 20 Uncertain 11 Table 4. Small finds by date. SFNo Date Material Sq no Description 1031 1916 Cu alloy C17 Penny of George V dated 1916. Die axis 12 1038 Cu alloy F12 Copper alloy penny of George II? Die axis 12 1046 Cu alloy H7 Copper alloy penny, post-med of William and Mary? 1051 Cu alloy G7 P med penny, Britannia rev 1015 1914 Cu alloy C16 Copper alloy penny of George V dated to 1914. Obverse: Bust left. Obverse inscription: Georgius V Dei Gra Britt omn Rex FD DEF INDIMP. Reverse: Britannia right, in ex. 1914 London mint Die axis 12 1019 Cu alloy F13 Copper alloy penny, post-medieval in date, uncertain ruler, probably JamesII to George II (Anne?) Obverse: bust right 1023 1917 Cu alloy F22 Copper alloy farthing of George V dated 1917. Obverse: Bust left Obverse inscription: GEORGIUS V DEI GRA BRITT OMN REX FID DEF INDIMP Reverse: Britannia right Reverse inscription: FARTHING in ex. 1917. London mint Die axis 12 1001 1586 Silver F29 Sixpence, Elizabeth I. Obverse: Crowned bust left, rose behind head. Reverse: Long cross over square shield, date is above shield. Posui/ Devca/ Diviore/ M Meu London mint Die axis 6 Table 5. Coin catalogue. 10

3.4 Glass Fragments of post-medieval and modern glass were also collected, distributed as in Figure 9. Lidar data English Heritage Figure 9. Distribution of glass with cropmarks overlaid. 3.5 Worked flint Seventy-four worked flints were recovered during the fieldwalking. A breakdown by type is included in the table below. There were a further twelve burnt flints collected. Many of the flints were quite crudely struck and hinge fractures and other flaws were visible generally considered to be more typical of later Iron Age rather than earlier prehistoric knapping. There were few tools diagnostic of Neolithic or Bronze Age activity. Type No Notes Unpatinated flake 47 Patinated flake 7 Utilised unpatinated flake 7 Utilised patinated flake 3 Unpatinated core 3 Unpatinated scraper 3 Unpatinated blade 2 Patinated blade 1 Unpatinated awl 1 Possible awl? Table 6. Worked flint quantities 11

The distribution of the worked flints overlain with the prehistoric pottery is shown in Figure 10. Lidar data English Heritage Figure 10. Distribution of worked flint and prehistoric pottery. 4 Discussion and conclusions Whilst the fieldwalking has not produced definitive dating results for the cropmarks, the presence of twelve (probably representing 4-5) sherds of hand-made Iron Age pottery is significant as such fragile pottery rarely survives long in the ploughsoil and therefore it is likely to have been found close to the location of its original deposition. The flint flake assemblage also is more typical of Iron Age flint working than earlier periods, supporting a suggestion that at least some of these cropmarks may represent Iron Age activity. The prehistoric material tended to occur on the higher parts of the field. There is a small Roman assemblage, possibly attesting to Roman activity in the vicinity. The fragment of a samian plate and the presence of building material including box flue tile suggests both access to imported goods at the end of the first century AD and that a 12

high-status, heated building existed somewhere nearby. However the absence of metal finds, and in particular coins, given the extensive metal detecting carried out may alternatively suggest that the Roman material may have derived from manuring and had been brought onto the site from nearby rather than occupation on the site itself. The finds corroborate the known Roman presence in the area indicated by previous finds of amphora within 400m of the field to the north (SSM 006) and cinerary urns (SSM 007) and the site of a possible Roman bridge (SSM 008) on the line of the main street through Stratford St Mary village. The apparent concentration of the Roman tile along the southern edge of the site is intriguing and not easily explained. The presence of medieval and post-medieval pottery reflects the field s proximity to the two medieval settlements. Higham Church, which dates to at least the 13th century, is situated close to the west end of the field and at the opposing NE corner, next to the crossroads, is the Grade II listed Lowe Hill House, an open hall which dates from the 15th century. There is a slight trend for the material to have been found close to the footpath marked on the early OS map suggesting that this might be a long-standing path between the two villages and linear cropmarks close to this line could also be an expression of this route (Fig. 11). There is a second concentration at the eastern end of the site, an area which is shown as a separate field on the 1904 OS survey. There was a high density of post-medieval CBM and modern brick across the site with concentrations close to the road at the north edge of the field and towards Higham Hall. The present Higham Hall dates from the 17th century but was much altered including the building of a new wing in the early 19th century and it is possible that some of the material collected from west end of the field derives from these alterations. Whilst the material close to the south east corner of the site may be from the demolition of the out buildings, believed to have been a nursery, shown in this area on the 1945 aerial photograph, Lowe Hill House at the NE corner had a chimney in the 17th century and is roofed with tiles of a similar date, so this could be an alternative source of the brick and tile. 13

N Figure 11. 2nd edition, 1905 Ordnance Survey Map with cropmarks overlaid. 5. Acknowledgements The fieldwork was carried out by thirty-two volunteers under the guidance of members of SCCAS Field team and it was directed by Jo Caruth. The work was carried out as part of the Managing a Masterpiece Scheme (an HLF funded project) and SCCAS are grateful for the help and support of Chris Burton (Scheme Manager), and Dan King throughout the project. SCCAS are particularly grateful to Mr Gurney for allowing us onto the field, and to all the volunteers who carried out the work capably and enthusiastically. 14

6 Plates 6.1 The fieldwalking, March 3rd and 4th, 2012 15

16

17

18

19

20

21

6.2 Metal detecting 22

23

6.3 Surveying and timekeeping 24

6.4 Finds washing and quantifying 25

26

Appendix 1 HGM 023 Pottery catalogue Square no Prehistoric pottery no Prehistoric pottery wt Roman pottery no Roman pottery wt Early medieval pottery no Early medieval pottery wt Medieval pottery no Medieval pottery wt Postmedieval pottery no Postmedieval pottery wt Modern pottery no Modern Pottery date pottery wt C10 2 5 16th-18th & one poss C11 1 4 16th-18th C12 1 4?16th-18th (unsure, m C14 2 13 M/L12th-14th C15 3 35 16th-18th C17 1 6 16th-18th C18 1 16 1 2 M1st-E2nd (Drg 18/3 C19 1 1 16th-18th C20 2 56 16th-18th C22 1 29 1 8 IA & 15th-L16th (Tra C24 1 10 15th-L16th (Trans L C25 1 24 18th-20th C26 3 34 1 4 16th-18th & 18th-20t C27 1 6 6 72 M/12th-14th & 16th- C28 2 16 16th-18th (one poss 1 C29 1 17 2 48 1 1 14th-15th & 16th-18t D08 2 10 16th-18th D10 1 1 16th-18th (could be tr D11 3 36 16th-18th D15 5 35 18th-20th D16 1 1 L18th-19th D19 1 27 17th-20th D20 1 20 1 6 EIA-MIA & 16th-18t D22 1 6 16th-18th (could be 1 D23 1 9 16th-18th D24 1 16 18th-20th D25 5 79 18th-20th Page 1 of 4

Square no Prehistoric pottery no Prehistoric pottery wt Roman pottery no Roman pottery wt Early medieval pottery no Early medieval pottery wt Medieval pottery no Medieval pottery wt Postmedieval pottery no Postmedieval pottery wt Modern pottery no Modern Pottery date pottery wt D26 1 18 3 119 M/L12th-14th (CBM D27 1 6?15th-16th D28 1 3 1 57 1 10 M/L12th-14th & 16th D29 2 7 18th-20th E05 1 3 2 23 1 6 Roman & 16th-18th E06 2 16 16th-18th E07 1 40 E17th-19th E08 1 2 Over fired E11 1 10 16th-18th E12 1 7 16th-18th E13 1 26 2 53 15th-L16th & 16th-1 E17 1 17 16th-18th (too worn b E18 2 34 16th-18th E21 1 4 18th-20th E23 1 8 1 1 16th-18th & 18th-20t E24 1 4 1 8 L12th-15th & 16th-1 E25 2 49 6 50 16th-18th & 18th-20t E26 2 12 15th-L16th (both LM E27 1 6 1 3?IA (extremely worn E28 1 2 16th-18th E29 11 111 6 68 L12th-15th/L16th & F05 2 24 16th-18th F06 3 18 16th-18th (one poss 1 F07 2 15 4 37 15th-L16th (Trans L F08 1 2 L12th-15th (not sure i F09 1 1 2 18 15th-L16th & 16th-1 F11 3 46 16th-18th F21 3 55 16th-18th F25 1 12 15th-L16th (could be Page 2 of 4

Square no Prehistoric pottery no Prehistoric pottery wt Roman pottery no Roman pottery wt Early medieval pottery no Early medieval pottery wt Medieval pottery no Medieval pottery wt Postmedieval pottery no Postmedieval pottery wt Modern pottery no Modern Pottery date pottery wt F27 1 9 1 11 M/L12th-14th & 16th F28 1 7 16th-18th C (plus two F29 2 22 2 3 16th-18th & 19th-20t G07 1 12 c 16th like LMT G09 1 9 L12th-15th G12 9 12 MBA or MIA+ grog/o G13 1 33 16th-18th C G15 1 9 L17th-18th G16 1 10 17th-19th G18 1 1 18th-20th G19 1 1 19th-20th G23 1 5 Fine, not likely Med G24 1 6 18th-20th G27 1 10 18th-20th H05 1 8?M/L12th-14th Cpot H06 2 34 1 5 1 4 Roman (one poss stor H07 2 12 16th-18th & M17th-E H10 2 8 2 26 16th-18th & 18th-20t H11 4 43 2 27 16th-18th & 18th-19t H12 1 1 L18th-20th H18 1 17 18th-19th H24 1 3 M/L12th-14th H25 1 12 16th-18th H26 1 12 16th-18th H27 1 9 M/L12th-14th C H29 1 8 16th-18th I05 1 10 15th-L16th LMT I07 1 20 16th-18th I08 1 21 16th-18th Page 3 of 4

Square no Prehistoric pottery no Prehistoric pottery wt Roman pottery no Roman pottery wt Early medieval pottery no Early medieval pottery wt Medieval pottery no Medieval pottery wt Postmedieval pottery no Postmedieval pottery wt Modern pottery no Modern Pottery date pottery wt I16 1 5 16th18th (poss c 16th I18 1 23 16th-18th I22 1 2 LMed/EPMed I25 1 3 Earlier PMed I27 1 5 1 8 LMed & 16th-18th C J05 1 4 E17th-19th J07 1 2 18th-20th J08 1 4 1 2 L12th-14th & 16th-1 J10 2 10 16th-18th J11 1 24 17th-19th J12 1 2 1 24 M/L12th-14th & 16th J14 1 7 1 22 15th-L16th & 18th-2 J16 1 5 18th-20th J18 3 17 16th-18th J22 2 17 16-18th (one could be J24 1 2 18th-20th J25 1 3 1 10 M12-14th/15th & 18t J25 1 5 15th-16th + J26 1 6 1 17 15th-L16th (LMT) & J27 2 17 2 25 2 19 L12th-14th?+ & 16th K05 1 14 16th-18th K06 1 11 16th-18th K08 2 36 16th-18th K11 1 11 M/L12th-14th K12 1 3 1 7 16th-18th & 18th-20t K13 1 9 15th-L16th (LMT? C K14 1 5 1 7 17th-19th & 18th-20t Page 4 of 4

Appendix 2 HGM 023 CBM catalogue Square no Tile no. Tile wt. Brick no Brick wt Of which Roman Other CBM no Other CBM wt Roman no. CBM wt C10 21 209 C11 45 708 1 39 C12 26 418 1 11 C13 30 574 2 215 1 10 C14 17 278 5 121 11 100 C15 19 313 C16 9 139 1 87 1 17 C17 16 321 3 44 4 69 C18 12 179 3 76 C19 6 75 C20 8 214 4 50 2 52 C21 21 361 3 185 3 57 C22 23 466 4 116 11 199 C23 12 254 5 67 5 125 C24 13 478 1 1034 5 172 C25 C26 1 17 C27 27 1537 3 163 9 942 C28 9 184 5 78 3 50 C29 1 281 D08 1 0 D09 52 607 D1 0 D11 48 599 D12 90 1349 D13 48 677 1 233 D14 11 406 1 11 D15 7 179 D16 8 152 D17 11 145 D18 5 109 D19 7 171 D20 8 202 1 2 Page 1 of 6

Square no Tile no. Tile wt. Brick no Brick wt Of which Roman Other CBM no Other CBM wt Roman no. CBM wt D21 5 107 D22 10 190 2 205 D23 8 182 1 163 D24 12 447 3 37 0 D25 3 105 1 0 D26 D27 15 55 0 D28 26 861 D29 1 37 E05 51 1036 1 7 0 E06 56 1143 2 86 E07 39 738 1 54 E08 38 835 1 162 E09 E10 89 1729 E11 55 771 E12 36 673 1 1534 1 8 E13 34 622 1 62 2 21 E14 18 434 2 436 E15 21 379 E16 20 429 E17 40 77 0 E18 24 432 E19 16 35 0 E20 15 360 3 109 E21 26 436 E22 22 507 E23 6 115 E24 3 56 E25 E26 1 13 0 E27 25 512 E28 38 1056 E29 35 1253 2 243 F05 Page 2 of 6

Square no Tile no. Tile wt. Brick no Brick wt Of which Roman Other CBM no Other CBM wt Roman no. CBM wt F06 66 1478 F07 63 1205 1 47 F08 F09 57 875 F10 65 1156 2 0 F11 48 921 1 85 F12 34 427 2 238 F13 21 336 1 623 F14 6 221 F15 2 145 F16 4 159 F17 11 317 F18 13 356 F19 21 39 0 F20 21 426 F21 16 335 F22 9 203 F23 11 29 0 F24 11 31 0 F25 12 449 F26 16 555 F27 11 36 0 F28 14 542 F29 9 298 G05 G07 G08 G09 G10 47 87 0 G11 23 492 G12 13 281 G13 6 141 G14 G15 G16 Page 3 of 6

Square no Tile no. Tile wt. Brick no Brick wt Of which Roman Other CBM no Other CBM wt Roman no. CBM wt G17 G18 G19 G2 0 G21 G22 G23 G24 G25 G26 G27 G28 2 46 G29 H05 54 1185 H06 H07 H08 70 1373 H09 H10 65 1227 2 77 H11 81 1448 1 71 H12 37 616 1 88 2 21 H13 33 446 1 56 3 32 H14 5 13 0 H15 16 301 H16 7 184 1 49 H17 15 284 H18 22 442 H19 17 359 H20 23 494 H21 29 521 H22 37 58 0 H23 21 364 H24 35 674 1 84 H25 63 1296 H26 17 547 Page 4 of 6

Square no Tile no. Tile wt. Brick no Brick wt Of which Roman Other CBM no Other CBM wt Roman no. CBM wt H27 18 552 H28 5 216 1 21 H29 10 30 0 I05 I06 0 345 I07 1 0 I08 64 1179 I09 64 1253 2 201 I1 0 I11 101 1828 2 49 I12 44 696 1 59 I13 62 733 I14 26 443 I15 14 203 I16 19 286 I17 8 138 I18 10 192 I19 9 206 I20 7 126 I21 9 202 I22 13 197 I23 9 22 0 I24 23 428 I25 39 85 0 I26 13 251 I27 6 126 I28 6 117 1 235 J05 J06 J07 39 686 J08 64 1148 2 135 J09 96 1625 1 0 J10 93 1540 3 192 J11 122 2038 1 219 J12 88 1804 2 88 Page 5 of 6

Square no Tile no. Tile wt. Brick no Brick wt Of which Roman Other CBM no Other CBM wt Roman no. CBM wt J13 91 1434 2 133 J14 40 705 1 145 J15 9 227 J16 17 442 J17 15 234 J18 13 314 1 46 J19 24 480 1 186 J20 17 343 J21 20 404 J22 34 597 J23 21 430 1 37 J24 36 728 J25 J26 22 408 J27 26 596 J28 61 1695 K07 30 395 K08 63 455 K09 23 252 K10 420 35 K11 K12 16 320 1 49 K13 22 248 K14 10 386 K5 19 348 1 106 K6 22 370 2 67 Page 6 of 6

Appendix 3 Square no Unpatinated flake no HGM 023 Worked Flint Catalogue Patinated flake no Utilised unpatinated no Utilised patinated no Core unpatinated no Core patinated no Scraper unpatinated no Scraper patinated no Blade unpatinated no Blade patinated no Burnt Other C19 0 1 0 C20 1 C21 1 C22 1 D16 1 0 1 D17 1 D18 1 0 1 D20 4 0 1 D21 1 D22 0 Weird tool D29 1 D9 1 1 0 E12 0 1 0 F13 1 0 1 F19 1 F29 1 G10 1 0 1 G12 3 + Awl or b G13 1 G16 1 G17 3 G2 0 1 G21 0 1 0 G23 1 G28 1 G5 1 0 1 G7 3 1 0 Page 1 of 2

Square no Unpatinated flake no Patinated flake no Utilised unpatinated no Utilised patinated no Core unpatinated no Core patinated no Scraper unpatinated no Scraper patinated no Blade unpatinated no Blade patinated no Burnt Other G8 2 0 1? Scraper H12 1 H14 2 H15 1 H16 1 H17 1 1 0 H18 1 H19 1 H20 1 H21 1 1 0 H23 4 H25 1 0 1 H27 2 1 flake cou H28 1 H5 1 H9 1 I15 2 I16 0 1 I2 0 1 I28 1 I5 1 I6 1 J11 0 1 1 J14 1 J18 0 1 0 J22 1 J6 1 J8 1 1 0 1 0 Page 2 of 2

Appendix 4 Small Find Number Date Object Type Finds Cate gory Materi al HGM 023 Small Finds Square no Description Period Weight Depth Width Length Diamet Method erof manufac ture Comple Wear teness 1001 1586 Coin Silver F29 Sixpence, Elizabeth I. Obverse: Crowned bust left, rose behind head. Reverse: Long cross over square shield, date is above shield. Posui/ Devca/ Diviore/ M Meu London mint Die axis 6 Post medieval 2.94 25.85 Struck or Whole 1003 Fragmen Lead H28 Lead waste fragment, probably post medieval/modern Uncertain 45.49 5.37 32.67 57.16 1004 Sheet Cu alloy I24 Rectangular copper-alloy plate, 2 rivet holes at complete Modern 9.41 2.17 23.73 31.4 Cast Incompl end. Modern 1005 Weight Lead J24 Cast lead weight, cylindrical in form, central circular Uncertain 20.21 33.67 10.9 Cast Whole aperture. Probably medieval to modern in date 1006 Bullet? Cu alloy J23 Exploded copper-alloy bullet casing, probably.303 Modern 5.03 13.25 30.13 Cast Fragmen round or similar. Twentieth century in date 1007 Fragmen Cu alloy I22 Fragment of machine pressed copper-alloy, pellet and Modern 1.78 1.14 25.4 19.49 Cast Fragmen ringed decoration on face. Probably 19th or 20th century in date 1008 Weight Lead J18 Lead weight, cylindrical in form with central circular aperture. Probably medieval to modern Uncertain 57.58 39.39 15.93 Cast Whole 1009 Bullet? Cu alloy/ I15 Bullet? Uncertain cu alloy and lead? Conical with flattened tip probably modern in date Modern 0 23.46 9.57 Cast Fragmen 1010 Stud Cu alloy H15 Copper alloy fragment. Possibly a stud, rivet or fragment Modern 1.07 8.16 11.77 7.02 Cast Fragmen from a bullet casing or similar. Modern in date 1011 Fragmen Cu alloy H18 Copper alloy fragment. Modern. Probably bullet casing Modern 2.17 10.72 14.36 12 Cast Fragmen or similar 1012 1300-16 Vessel Cu alloy F18 Fragment from the rim of a cast copper alloy vessel, Medieval 3.83 2.53 21.5 14.23 Cast Fragmen probably a cooking vessel. Medieval in date or possibly early p med. 1013 Seal? Lead F17 Lead fragment, possibly half a cloth or sack seal with Post medieval 7.65 5.24 17.35 71.31 Cast Fragmen moulded decoration on one face. Probably post med to modern in date 1014 Bullet? Cu alloy D16 Cast copper alloy fragment, probably bullet or related. Modern. One end flattened and with central aperture Modern 6.75 7.98 24.93 21.52 Cast Fragmen 1015 1914 Coin Cu alloy C16 Copper alloy penny of George V dated to 1914. Obverse: Bust left. Obverse inscription: Georgius V Dei Gra Britt omn Rex FD DEF INDIMP. Revrse: Britannia right, in ex. 1914 London mint Die axis 12 Modern 8.81 30.97 Struck or Whole 1016 Bullet? Cu alloy C14 Cast copper alloy object, bullet related? Modern Modern 5.43 6.49 20.04 18.28 Cast Fragmen NB - all weights in grammes Page 1 of 3

Small Find Number Date Object Type Finds Cate gory Materi al Square no Description Period Weight Depth Width Length Diamet Method erof manufac ture Comple Wear teness 1017 Fitting Cu alloy D13 Cast copper alloy furniture fitting, post medieval in date, Modern 14.17 39.37 16.48 Cast Fragmen probably 19th or 20th century. Circular terminal with flange end 1018 15th -18t Stud Cu alloy E13 Cast copper alloy stud. Dome shaped head, slightly flattened with integrally cast square sectioned shaft at centre of back face. Probably p. med to modern, possibly later medieval Post medieval 5.46 18.17 17 Cast Whole 1019 Coin Cu alloy F13 Copper alloy penny, post medieval in date, uncertain ruler, probably JamesII to George II (Anne?) Obverse: bust right Post medieval 8.03 20.44 Struck or Whole 1020 Fragmen Other: H13 Fragment of white metal, uncertain form or date Uncertain 3.68 5.41 12.05 17.96 Cast Fragmen 1021 18th - 20 Button Cu alloy I14 Incomplete copper alloy livery button, missing sewing Post medieval 0 2.38 16.03 Cast Incompl loop on back face. Obverse depicts heraldic motif of stag head right turned to left. 18th to 20th century in date 1022 Token? Lead F21 Cast lead disc, probably a counter, token or seal (cloth/bale)? Date Uncertain 6.32 1.93 22.89 Cast Whole 1023 1917 Coin Cu alloy F22 Copper alloy farthing of George V dated 1917. Obverse: Bust left Obverse inscription: GEORGIUS V DEI GRA BRITT OMN REX FID DEF INDIMP Reverse: Britannia right Reverse inscription: FARTHING in ex. 1917. London mint Die axis 12 Modern 2.73 20.32 Struck or Whole 1024 Fragmen Lead? F23 Fragment of uncertain form or date-lead alloy? Uncertain 5.86 7.74 30.76 25.78 Cast Fragmen 1025 Weight Lead D14 Cast lead weight, cylindrical in form, central circular perforation.? Date Uncertain 46.38 51.57 12.29 Cast Whole 1026 20th cen Bullet Cu alloy G15 Fragment of copper alloy bullet, 20th century Modern 7.68 19.88 8.4 Cast Fragmen 1027 Fragmen Cu alloy H14 Sub-triangular fragment of copper alloy, modern Modern 1.02 0.9 9.36 29.93 Cast Fragmen 1028 18th - 20 Buckle Cu alloy J14 Incomplete fragment of a copper alloy double looped Post medieval 0 3.16 14.12 32.25 6.41 Cast Fragmen buckle frame. Part of side and bar survive, remainder missing due to old breaks. Probably horse related, post medieval to modern, C. 18th - 20th century 1029 Musket s Lead E18 Lead musket shot, post med-modern Post medieval 9.42 12.63 Cast Whole 1030 Fragmen Cu alloy D19 Copper alloy fragment, agricultural. Modern Modern 25.56 3.98 37.85 39.22 Cast Fragmen 1031 1916 Coin Cu alloy C17 Penny of George V dated 1916. Die axis 12 Modern 8.96 30.99 Struck or Whole 1032 17th - 19 Thimble Cu alloy I24 Cast copper alloy thimble, machine made, c. 17th - 19th Post medieval 3.67 14.07 13.42 Cast Whole century 1033 Weight Lead G25 Large cast lead weight, p med - modern Uncertain 102.56 10.61 27.69 42.58 Cast Whole 1034 Fragmen Cu alloy G24 Cast copper alloy object, agricultural, modern Modern 6.49 7.32 14.75 39.36 Cast Whole NB - all weights in grammes Page 2 of 3

Small Find Number Date Object Type Finds Cate gory Materi al Square no Description Period Weight Depth Width Length Diamet Method erof manufac ture Comple Wear teness 1035 Musket s Lead F25 Lead musket shot, p med Post medieval 28.03 18.01 Cast Whole 1036 18th - 20 Buckle Iron? D12 Cast (copper alloy) iron? Looped buckle frame, Modern 17.76 6.32 41.51 33.96 Cast Whole rectangular with separately cast pin, probably 18th - 20th century in date 1037 Strap en Cu alloy D12 Cast copper alloy object strap end terminal? Modern? Modern 3.51 1.57 9.41 33.85 Cast Fragmen 1038 Coin Cu alloy F12 Copper alloy penny of George II? Die axis 12 Post medieval 9.45 29.31 Cast Whole 1039 Fragmen Lead H12 Lead fragment/waste? Date Uncertain 5.35 3.94 11.93 25.09 Cast Fragmen 1040 20th cen Bullet Cu alloy H12 Copper alloy bullet fragment. 20th century Modern 6.4 31.66 8.38 Cast Fragmen 1041 Bullet Cu alloy K13 Copper alloy bullet casing? Modern? Modern 18.06 19.06 76.15 Cast Fragmen 1042 Musket s Lead G11 Lead musket shot. P med/ modern Post medieval 4.91 10.49 Cast Whole 1043 18th - 20 Cratal be Cu alloy D10 Copper alloy fragment of a cratal bell, 18th - 20th Modern 0.89 1.64 14.25 9.5 Cast Fragmen century 1044 Weight Lead E9 Cast lead weight, cylindrical in form with central Modern 52.07 42.12 15.17 Cast Whole circular aperture 1045 Seal Cu alloy H7 Cast copper alloy seal matrix, missing stem and Post medieval 2.95 6.36 14.36 15.97 Cast Fragmen suspension loop due to old breaks. Oval shaped die with heraldic motif. Post medieval, probably 18th century or later 1046 Coin Cu alloy H7 Copper alloy penny, p med of william and mary? Post medieval 9.4 28.35 Cast Whole 1047 Weight Lead I7 Lead weight, cylindrical with central aperture Uncertain 57.74 39.65 16.1 Cast Whole 1048 Mount Cu alloy F8 Cast copper alloy mount, furniture related? P med Post medieval 7.79 32.47 19.19 Cast Fragmen 1049 16th/17t Knife Cu alloy E8 Cast copper alloy post medieval knife end cap 16th/17th Post medieval 12.36 12.8 15.57 12.76 Cast Whole century 1050 Cratal be Cu alloy G6 Cast copper alloy cratal bell, incomplete. P med Post medieval 28.44 34.64 26.64 Cast Incompl 1051 Coin Cu alloy G7 P med penny, Britannia rev Post medieval 3.95 27.52 Struck or Whole 1052 Musket s Lead Lead musket shot, p med Post medieval 8.4 12.35 Cast Whole 1053 Musket s Lead I4 Musket shot and glass frag Post medieval 7.15 11.03 Cast Whole 1054 Weight Lead Lead weight, cylindrical with central hole Uncertain 31.77 39.37 13.8 Cast Whole 1055 Musket s Lead Lead Musket shot Post medieval 14.74 14.02 Cast Whole NB - all weights in grammes Page 3 of 3

Archaeological services Field Projects Team Delivering a full range of archaeological services Desk-based assessments and advice Site investigation Outreach and educational resources Historic Building Recording Environmental processing Finds analysis and photography Graphics design and illustration Contact: Rhodri Gardner Tel: 01473 265879 rhodri.gardner@suffolk.gov.uk www.suffolk.gov.uk/environment/archaeology/